He is the commander in chief and knows what he is doing. We also know that many people who appeared against us are not they are just playing a part to push the agenda forward. So it would be nice if you either support him or get out.
I support him. That doesn't mean I have to be happy about hearing him want to primary one of the few people in congress I can count on (MTG) to support our 2nd amendment rights.
Why is this first reaction at this point to engage with this statement directly, instead of as an example of kayfabe and comms?
“Politics is acting for ugly people.”
There is still so much direct, literal engagement with tweets like this, rather than looking up post timestamps, references to bracketed capitalized words, and other Q-adjacent methodologies, etc. I don’t understand why.
This isn’t about you per se, more that I’m confused as to why the direct, literal approach is still so widespread after so many years.
Do we need better comms training threads? I know I could definitely still use better training on these things to get even remotely near the level of some people. See also sylver’s and oldschoolfool’s comments below.
i am a fan of the kayfabe angle right now because everything that is part of the show is kayfabe when you think about it but anyway here is mtg responding
Because there are literal retards here, that's why. They don't understand that we're in a war and shit happens in war that only the generals understand. Sigh.
Its the old knee jerk reaction. Besides. Trump supports our gun rights just fine and he is the final word on legislation. There is something else going on here or MTG has been compromised and trump is dumping here dead weight. Something tells me there is more to it.
Don't feel bad, fren. It's an op. How long will it take to primary her??? By then they will be kissing friends again. I bet they planned this ahead of time. She is saying things he can't atm & him appearing to be upset adds emphasis which is exactly what both of them & the white hats want.
I think you’re both kind of right and wrong in your assessments here.
We don’t have to line up with everything Trump says publicly in order to support him. We can easily disagree with what he says publicly and still trust the strategy he’s employing by choosing to say it.
I’ve come to trust Trump absolutely over the past 9 years. He has proven too many times over too long a period that when he says something I disagree with either:
He ends up being right because he knew stuff I wasn’t privy to
Or
He didn’t actually believe what he said, and clearly only said what he said for a tactical reason that became apparent later on (and is often obvious to me in the moment).
Q has helped me get this. Disinformation is NECESSARY in this kind of war. Where you are weak, it can be wise to make yourself appear strong. Where you are strong it can often benefit you to appear weak. When you are United it sometimes makes sense to appear divided (see: his “fight” with obvious white hat ally, Musk). I no longer sweat what Trump says publicly. I don’t get mad at him for what he says nor do I immediately accept it at face value. I trust what he’s doing even if I disagree with what he says. He’s more than earned that kind of trust at this point if you ask me. He manipulates the narrative strategically at every turn. He’s always playing a deeper game than his surface comments suggest. We know what he stands for. We know who he’s fighting for. We know who he’s fighting against. I just sit back and enjoy the show. Chess, not checkers.
This is for optics. I means he agrees with whatever she said on the view but can't say so now. In fact, he probably asked his to disclose whatever she revealed there but I still don't want to watch the view to find out!
So he calls to primary MTG....but has endorsed numerous other notorious, worse-than-useless RINO, like Lindsey Graham. 🙄
He is the commander in chief and knows what he is doing. We also know that many people who appeared against us are not they are just playing a part to push the agenda forward. So it would be nice if you either support him or get out.
I support him. That doesn't mean I have to be happy about hearing him want to primary one of the few people in congress I can count on (MTG) to support our 2nd amendment rights.
Serious question:
Why is this first reaction at this point to engage with this statement directly, instead of as an example of kayfabe and comms?
“Politics is acting for ugly people.”
There is still so much direct, literal engagement with tweets like this, rather than looking up post timestamps, references to bracketed capitalized words, and other Q-adjacent methodologies, etc. I don’t understand why.
This isn’t about you per se, more that I’m confused as to why the direct, literal approach is still so widespread after so many years.
Do we need better comms training threads? I know I could definitely still use better training on these things to get even remotely near the level of some people. See also sylver’s and oldschoolfool’s comments below.
i am a fan of the kayfabe angle right now because everything that is part of the show is kayfabe when you think about it but anyway here is mtg responding
Because there are literal retards here, that's why. They don't understand that we're in a war and shit happens in war that only the generals understand. Sigh.
In Hollywood the cream rises, in Washington the skum rises.
Its the old knee jerk reaction. Besides. Trump supports our gun rights just fine and he is the final word on legislation. There is something else going on here or MTG has been compromised and trump is dumping here dead weight. Something tells me there is more to it.
DeSantis, Elon Musk, what would you say to this being another fake fued amongst his supporters?
Obviously MTG has been about as big a supporter of POTUS as one can get, so me thinks this is the same thing.
A fued orchestrated for the benefit of others.
Anything is possible.
100 percent
Don't feel bad, fren. It's an op. How long will it take to primary her??? By then they will be kissing friends again. I bet they planned this ahead of time. She is saying things he can't atm & him appearing to be upset adds emphasis which is exactly what both of them & the white hats want.
I think you’re both kind of right and wrong in your assessments here.
We don’t have to line up with everything Trump says publicly in order to support him. We can easily disagree with what he says publicly and still trust the strategy he’s employing by choosing to say it.
I’ve come to trust Trump absolutely over the past 9 years. He has proven too many times over too long a period that when he says something I disagree with either:
Or
Q has helped me get this. Disinformation is NECESSARY in this kind of war. Where you are weak, it can be wise to make yourself appear strong. Where you are strong it can often benefit you to appear weak. When you are United it sometimes makes sense to appear divided (see: his “fight” with obvious white hat ally, Musk). I no longer sweat what Trump says publicly. I don’t get mad at him for what he says nor do I immediately accept it at face value. I trust what he’s doing even if I disagree with what he says. He’s more than earned that kind of trust at this point if you ask me. He manipulates the narrative strategically at every turn. He’s always playing a deeper game than his surface comments suggest. We know what he stands for. We know who he’s fighting for. We know who he’s fighting against. I just sit back and enjoy the show. Chess, not checkers.
Sounds like cope to me
Thats not how this works.
Does support mean to agree 100% on everything? I support my family. I support my church. But not on 100% of all things.
Checker players opining on a chess match between Masters, don't let it rub you wrong.
Graham was going to win regardless.
when next year??? kek
This is for optics. I means he agrees with whatever she said on the view but can't say so now. In fact, he probably asked his to disclose whatever she revealed there but I still don't want to watch the view to find out!