Candace Owens responds after Erika Kirk interview.
(twitter.com)
Comments (83)
sorted by:
Even if you have 0.1% probability that someone might actually not have anything to do with their husband’s assassination and could be a real grieving widow is a good idea not to attack them. I am sure it’s not that hard to wait until the fog clears.
Naw, have to start asking questions immediately these days. Things move too quick. And Erika is far far too shady. Waiting until ‘the fog clears’ is not an option.
Exactly and anyone saying that Owens is on a “rant” for personal gain, is obviously not watching the mountain of evidence she has uncovered. Question everything.
Obviously you haven't been paying attention to the "fog".
If we all jumped in the same way to everytime things looked shady, boy, the last 8 years would have been totaly different.
b_b gets it.
she had no problem taking the mantle and going on a full media grief blitz storm. She had no problem forgiving the killer of her husband but she suddenly has a problem with the one person asking the questions we are all thinking?
Let me ask you this question because all i hear are innuendos, but no one says it out loud. What exactly do you think her role was in the assassination? What’s the single best proof you can provide for that?
Playing devils advocate, I would say she wasn't there because she knew it was going to happen and didn't want to be there when it did happen. (I know, that sounds retarded).
Yes, valid point, and completely consistent with the FBI having realised there was an assassination being plotted against him and decided to make it a sting operation.
I think what people are missing is - just because something doesn't add up, does not mean there is only one answer to the puzzle. Which is exactly what people like Candace are capitalizing on - leading their followers to think only in one way and not expand their thinking.
Where did I insinuate that she had a role? I’ll wait. My issue is that a lot of things don’t add up that day, and she is attacking the one person asking questions - about the assassination of her husband and the father of her children. She herself isn’t asking any questions, it’s all fine and dandy for her. To me, that’s very suspect, and I’d like to know more about all of it.
Hope that clears something up for you.
This is exactly what I was expecting. You cant even articulate what is it she is supposed to have done, but you have allowed the narratives to create so much animosity towards her that you judge everything she does as if there is an ulterior motive, while not being able to atleast say what it is.
Incidentally, this is exactly the kind of arguments i have on reddit regarding folks who fall for MSM narratives and have developed animosity towards Trump but without ever being able to articulate exactly what he did wrong.
Yes, and there are multiple explanations that can explain the things that don't add up. Like, if this was a sting operation / witness protection operation.
And this is entirely consistent with the same scenario. Infact, in this scenario, "asking questions" might. actually put them in even more danger. And that is exactly what Candace might be doing, wittingly or unwittingly, possibly because her husband might be her handler.
You are assuming that a person needs to behave in a certain way but thats like not being able to look at the whole chessboard and assuming the players have to be making certain specific moves.
She has no obligation to tell you or anyone else what she knows. Period.
Yes. I was worried I might have missed something important that Candace dropped, but you confirmed that its all just narrative spun around the face that things didn't add up that day, but without considering all scenarios.
Thanks, I needed that confirmation so I dont have to waste any more time on Candace.
I appreciate that you took the time to write this all up so I will respond.
First off, you’re off base with your claim that I can’t articulate what she’s done. I didn’t make any claim at all. Instead, I am criticizing the fact that she is attacking the only person trying to get to the bottom of the assassination of HER husband, and the fact that she isn’t questioning anything is very shady, because that official story is trash.
The explanation of it being a “sting operation” is junk, I don’t buy it even a little. You’re free to believe what you want.
I never said Erika is obligated to say anything, but that doesn’t mean the rest of us don’t want questions answered. We do.
I guess everything that happened between 2016 to 2025 was a Q military operation EXCEPT for Charlie's assassination. Got it.
Yes you are. Just make sure what you believe is consistent with everything else you believe. Thats all any of us can hope to do.
Moves and countermoves bro. I guess you forgot that whole bit. Or maybe you just cherry pick the drops you like to get the outcome you want.
Stew Peters has done the best breakdown on the Erika Kirk rabbit hole. She is shady AF.
This is exactly why I won’t watch Owen’s rants about Kirk’s death, she doesn’t care enough to consider that Kirk’s kids, while still very young, may in the future hear her theories about who was involved in assassinating their father. How awkward to hear from a supposedly good friend of their father that their beloved mother was in on killing their dad.
From what little I have heard about her rants, it looks like she uses her supposed friendship with Kirk as a weapon to attack others for not agreeing with everything she says and a shield to deflect anyone questioning her motives. Nasty stuff, regardless of where this all lands.
Is CO calling for the children to be taken away from Erika because of her theory that she is somehow involved in Kirk’s death? If not, then she’s just making money off of her rants, there’s no genuine concern there.
No one is saying its illegal to make money off of nasty stuff. Lefties do it all the time. Candace is welcome to do it as well.
True, she also has the luxury from doing so at a distance since she doesn’t live in the US.
Oh look another shill proud of their ignorance
Oh look another shill that can’t fathom an opposing angle that sees the forest instead of the trees. Can you tell me the timeline of events that immediately kicked off after CK assassination that has led to Soros being investigated for domestic terrorism? If not, then sit down clown.
Dude touch grass. You don't have an "opposing angle" because you "don't watch Owen's rants."
You earn an angle with educating yourself. Don't be another leftist bragging about what they don't know smh
Dude, I’ve already looked at opposing angles from other people who posted about the oddities of Kirk’s death. Other people who have a lot more knowledge than CO does about ballistics. There are weird things going on sure, but do you honestly think that the WHs wouldn’t stage, as in fake, an assassination in order to catapult the movement to a higher level and to also go after Antifa and ultimately Soros? Because that is exactly what happened immediately after Kirk’s death. Go look it up. And then convince yourself that it’s not possible.
Just get the alpha and make up your own mind, how have you not learned this yet
LOL, I already made up my mind, I already told you.
"grieving widow"?
Have you been following any of Erika's movements or watched her video response?
And who gets to decide how someone grieves?
The public gets to decide if EK is involved in TPUSA's coverup of the CK murder by her actions and refusing to answer questions.
Have you actually been following CO's investigation or are you just lobbing out emotional rhetoric like EK (EF)?
Everything CO had put forward can be explained by the scenario of a sting operation / witness protection.
Yet the smart girl she is, she simply cannot concieve this scenario in her analyses somehow. Oh and she is the one who can't talk for 5 mins without getting totally emotional. Does that not bother you as well?
But on top of that she has not put forth anything that 100% implicates Erika or anyone else but people here still act like she did.
Lots of words when a simple "no" would've worked.
Not when no is not the answer! Keep up buddy. If you are going to be here for long you might want to brush up your ability to read more than a few words
Pearls….
You literally admitted in another comment “thanks so now I don’t have to listen to Candace” and now claim that you have listened to her. Get you’re story straight because you sound full of it buddy
If you understood English grammar, esp future and past tense, you wouldnt have to reach so low to vent your anger. at having been called out.
Attacking my grammar doesn’t change the fact that you flip flop more than John Kerry
And actually she had no duty to answer to "public" just because the said public let their brains washed by the narrative being pushed.
Not very different from watching some of the lefties getting brainwashed by narratives that make then think Trump is a pedo, for instance
As soon as she put herself in the position of CEO and tried to silence anyone questioning his assassination, Mrs handkerchief dry eyes put herself in that position.
She jumped on to be the ceo.
This is a game left play. Put a woman in a position of power, then you cannot question anything, especially if it is a grieving woman because then you will make her cry.
You mean she took the position of her husband to do what they were doing together? How dare she!
Kinda crazy how Charlie Kirk gets assassinated and all the sudden in 1 day we have all the answers, a single "lone murderer" per usual and one guy he supposedly texted about love. Yet no response about egypt planes, no response about ROTC being there, no response about peoples actions there after. Everything about this case is bullshit and we all want to know why TPUSA doesnt give a fuck, and why they think we should just scoop this under the table. If we dont expose this, it opens the door more assassinations. No one buying the official narrative and I also agree that if Erika didn't want flak, she should have not taken the CEO position.
Exactly! Why is this so hard for some to understand? And the witness protection angle - we get it already!!! No one on GAW knows that for sure. In the meantime Candace remains the tip of the spear. It is so obvious and nauseating when people make absolutist snarky comments without actually watching her content. In an investigation details matter.
Why had nobody investigated the one guy who looks like be detonates a device? Saw it on here and a Stew Peters clip.
Noise.
Noise you should start paying attention to.
When heads start to roll because of what's happened to the children, then I'll start listening. Until then, it's all noise.
The same people who take the children killed CK
I did not watch the Erika piece on Fox so I have no idea what Candace is talking about ....
Is there more to the Charlie story...yes but will we ever know the truth?
Maybe.....but like the JFK assassination, it could be a long time coming.
It's disturbing that a self-serving narcissist like Owens can try so hard to divide our movement and destroy TPUSA. She's not one of us. She's for herself.
I’ve actually wondered about her motives.
TPUSA is irrelevant now. Nobody cares cause nobody believes the official CK narrative.
The only person dividing is Kash Patel and his fucking lies. A 30-06 did not kill Charlie Kirk.
That reminds me. Candace has a new podcast out. It will be a good day to do some things outside and listen to her..
TPUSA asked Owens to bring her proof and debate them. Al of a sudden Owens can't make it. It's a bad time. Kek
They gave her 24 hours to agree, told her at midnight(indirectly, mind you), didn't let her give input on the time or date, wouldn't let her come on a zoom call, oh and the date and time they picked? Her husband's birthday.
Do better.
I would have thought after all her accusations she would ready and will to come forth. Careful who you follow. I cut her off when she went against Trump. I don't know her motive other than money. Now go kiss he butt so you can fell better!
How's That?
Silly.
Kek
OK 4POG, I dont get WHERE this script is going BUT it is clearly going somewhere because you have brought in the ALL-STAR cast of Alt Media minus Alex Jones because you want main stream street cred?
Owens is a grifter.
I don't understand why people can't look at her history of leftist behavior and realize she's the same mean girl archetype we hate in the left, just saying things for a different crowd to try and be popular.
Honestly I can't stand either one of them, but especially Candace Owens. She reminds me of a black Ann Coulter.
Have none of you considered that this whole argument over CO and EK is a manufactured distraction? It's just like every now and then the flat-earth crap comes up and pulls people away from other important stuff and into another irrelevant argument.