34
posted ago by 5DchessWatch ago by 5DchessWatch +34 / -0

Before you start with "But why are you watching that jackass anyway?" My response is: cultural research; I watched it so you don't have to.


He mentioned No Name to irritate Trump and Trump supporters

Also he shat on Charlie Kirk and said "he was no MLK". Well that's true. Charlie Kirk was a real Christian. The other was a false victimhood black guy with some nice words of wisdom that no blacks ever followed after he died. Too bad. So sad.

I used to like Chapelle's standup, and as a white person, I was not offended by his anti whitism and racism in the other direction. I expect this because that's been his whole career's schtick, to play with race.

But this john mccain thing says that the CIA intervened on behalf of Netlifx and made him incorporate this into his standup.

He also underscored the dwindling first amendment rights in the US, but all this does is irritate the right because they are the ones most subjected to the arbitrary, political restrictions on digital platforms, directed covertly by the US gov (ref: dr ayudarai's case against pre musk twitter, exposing DHS:CISA backdoor administrative twitter portal for shadobanning and deplatforming people).

Just because Chapelle has ONE right wing value: being anti Trans, doesn't make him remotely 'on our side' or a right winger. It's just enough right wing ism in order to make him more accessible to the right and less polarizing; but the 2ndary reason for the anti trans narrative is to frustrate the right by REMINDING THEM OF HOW THEY ARE BEING DISPROPORTIONATELY CENSORED on the internet.

And that's because it's not the left that control the digital / social media platforms, it's the intelligence community that does.

This is the 3nd reason why I'm saying that chapelle is an asset of CIA

Reasons --> Why

  • McCain mention --> Insult Trump/supporters
  • Charlie Kirk was no MLK --> spurring race war
  • "You're more free to say stuff in Saudi than in America now"--> underscores right wing censorship
  • Exalting Falcon --> Denigrating Eagle (yes, kind of weak symbolic insult)
  • Defending Puffy --> Protecting satanic pedophiles, trying to shelter hollywood

The Saudi misdemeanor and falcon joke WAS funny, but I bet the left didn't like it, because it was still him punching down on transgenders.

Beyond that, it wasn't funny, it was tired and mean, but most of all, it seemed a lot like midwit CIA programming.

Change my mind.

.....Or don't.