More importantly, Co-Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew Bailey, was spotted there also. He's quietly been investigating the voter fraud since he was appointed.
Chris Krebs, former head of CISA fired by Trump (a point no troll will let you get by on casual InfoSec forums) has got a Ricky Ricardo situation.. lotta splaining to do. Also the Oracle raid in Texas after the 2020 election was always suss to me…
All former democrats that have/had great power in Trumps 2nd term.
Had someone suggested this to me before, I'd have called BS. Had I been forewarned I would not have supported it. But things happened in a different order, and here I am.
Scripture repeatedly presents the rise of unqualified or improper leadership as a covenantal judgment, and in several explicit texts, women ruling over men is listed as a sign of societal disorder brought on by rebellion against God’s law. The argument is not about female worth or competence, but about role reversal as judgment, the same way child rulers or weak rulers are described.
The clearest text: Isaiah 3
Isaiah is addressing Judah under judgment.
Isaiah 3:4 “I will make boys their princes, and infants shall rule over them.”
This establishes the principle. Judgment looks like inversion of proper authority.
A few verses later:
Isaiah 3:12 “My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, your guides mislead you, and they have swallowed up the course of your paths.”
Women rule over them” is not praised.
It is placed in parallel with childish rulers and oppression.
The result is confusion, misdirection, and national collapse.
The text does not say women ruling is neutral. It is presented as evidence that the nation is already under judgment.
Role reversal as a covenant curse
The Mosaic covenant explicitly warns that disobedience brings social inversion.
Deuteronomy 28:43–44 “The sojourner who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower.”
The pattern is not ethnicity or gender per se. It is loss of proper order. Authority moves away from where God placed it.
Isaiah simply applies that covenant logic to leadership structures.
Deborah is often cited as proof against this argument however the text itself says otherwise.
Judges 4:8–9 Barak refuses to go to battle unless Deborah goes with him. Deborah responds: “I will surely go with you. Nevertheless, the road on which you are going will not lead to your glory, for the Lord will sell Sisera into the hand of a woman.”
Her leadership is accompanied by:
Male cowardice
Loss of honor for Israel’s general
National weakness before deliverance
Deborah is faithful, wise, and obedient. But the situation exists because men failed. God delivers Israel, but He does so in a way that publicly shames male leadership. Keep in mind in that society women weren't even considered reliable witnesses. It was shameful for the juice at that time to be under a woman's leadership and was emasculating. They knew they were under judgment.
Judges is a book where everything happens because “everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). Deborah’s judgeship fits that tragic pattern, not an ideal one.
The New Testament grounds leadership roles not in culture, but in creation order.
1 Timothy 2:12–14 “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man… For Adam was formed first, then Eve.”
Paul appeals to creation, not Roman custom. When nations reject creation order, the Bible consistently treats that as moral and spiritual rebellion.
1 Corinthians 11:3 “The head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.”
Headship is not oppression. It is structure. When structure collapses, judgment follows.
Scripture repeatedly associates judgment with:
Weak rulers (Isaiah 3:4)
Child rulers (Ecclesiastes 10:16)
Role confusion (Romans 1:26–27)
Rejection of God-ordained authority (Hosea 4:6)
Women ruling over men fits this broader biblical category of disorder resulting from covenant unfaithfulness, not female inadequacy
To put bluntly: when God judges a nation, He does not always send fire. Sometimes He hands the steering wheel to people who were never meant to drive, and lets the crash teach the lesson.
As to your first objection... Are you saying that if something isn't repeated from the Old testament in the New testament then it's not valid? (That's certainly an unbiblical standard that you don't consistently hold to I hope) Because the case was already made in the OT and NOTHING in the NT contradicts that. That alone should be MORE than enough. But I'll back it up more....
The New Testament never redefines civil government from scratch.
Romans 13:1 “There is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.”
Paul does not describe a new kind of authority. He assumes the existing, biblically shaped understanding of rule. Roman rulers were not corrected on gender because the issue was not in dispute. Everyone already knew what rule looked like.
Likewise, the New Testament never forbids bestiality or incest either, not because those things became acceptable, but because they were already condemned by the moral law.
Civil authority is still headship and headship is grounded in creation.
1 Corinthians 11:3 “The head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.”
This is not church only logic. It is cosmic order. Authority flows downward in patterned ways. The New Testament does not compartmentalize headship into church and home while leaving the state as a genderless free for all.
Ephesians 5:23 “For the husband is the head of the wife.”
Paul grounds authority in creation, not in institutional boundaries. The state does not float above God’s created order like a philosophical blimp.
On top of that When Scripture speaks positively of rulers, the language is consistently male and paternal.
Isaiah 1:10 “Hear the word of the Lord, you rulers of Sodom.”
2 Samuel 23:3 “When one rules justly over men, ruling in the fear of God.”
Proverbs 16:12 “It is an abomination to kings to do evil.”
Kings, fathers, shepherds, elders. Scripture does not sprinkle gender neutrality over civil authority. The imagery is consistent because the order is consistent.
The New Testament explicitly treats role reversal as a sign of judgment.
Romans 1:21–27 Paul describes judgment not merely as bad behavior, but as God giving people over to disordered desires and roles.
This mirrors the Old Testament pattern where judgment shows up as confusion rather than immediate destruction.
Isaiah 3:12 “Women rule over them… your guides mislead you.”
The New Testament never repeals this logic. It intensifies it.
Deborah does not establish a norm. She highlights a failure.
New Testament silence does not establish permission. It assumes continuity with the moral law and the created order.
If silence established legitimacy, then the apostles accidentally endorsed a lot of pagan nonsense by not addressing it.
As for my statement about a disqualification, you're making a category error in your assessment. I was clearly talking about voting in and voluntarily selecting a woman ruler. That in itself is a rebellious action against God's order and it will be cursed.
Deborah wasn't voted in. She wasn't selected by the people. That's entirely different.
Go coconut-mommy.
We love you.
Rubio/Gabbard 2028-2032. Then Gabbard 2036
Kari Lake in there somewhere...
Stealth Tulsi is best Tulsi!
More importantly, Co-Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew Bailey, was spotted there also. He's quietly been investigating the voter fraud since he was appointed.
Chris Krebs, former head of CISA fired by Trump (a point no troll will let you get by on casual InfoSec forums) has got a Ricky Ricardo situation.. lotta splaining to do. Also the Oracle raid in Texas after the 2020 election was always suss to me…
Nice, didn't know he was there too. thx
I'd vote Tulsi for president. First woman I've ever considered tbh. She really stepped up. Impressed and very happy she's on our side.
Trump
Gabbard
Kennedy
Musk
Ramaswamy
All former democrats that have/had great power in Trumps 2nd term.
Had someone suggested this to me before, I'd have called BS. Had I been forewarned I would not have supported it. But things happened in a different order, and here I am.
Women in roles of leadership in a nation are a sign of God's judgement.
Hard pass on Garden of Eden 2.0
Yet she's outleading many men who have held the job. Ability only counts if you're a man?
So you would ignore God's Word for some perceived notion of "ability" in a role they have never been in? 😂
Being a man isn't an instant qualification but being a woman is an instant disqualification.
God isn't going to bless the administration of a woman. You would literally be voting in a curse.
Sure.
Scripture repeatedly presents the rise of unqualified or improper leadership as a covenantal judgment, and in several explicit texts, women ruling over men is listed as a sign of societal disorder brought on by rebellion against God’s law. The argument is not about female worth or competence, but about role reversal as judgment, the same way child rulers or weak rulers are described.
The clearest text: Isaiah 3 Isaiah is addressing Judah under judgment. Isaiah 3:4 “I will make boys their princes, and infants shall rule over them.” This establishes the principle. Judgment looks like inversion of proper authority.
A few verses later: Isaiah 3:12 “My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, your guides mislead you, and they have swallowed up the course of your paths.”
Women rule over them” is not praised. It is placed in parallel with childish rulers and oppression. The result is confusion, misdirection, and national collapse. The text does not say women ruling is neutral. It is presented as evidence that the nation is already under judgment.
Role reversal as a covenant curse
The Mosaic covenant explicitly warns that disobedience brings social inversion. Deuteronomy 28:43–44 “The sojourner who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower.” The pattern is not ethnicity or gender per se. It is loss of proper order. Authority moves away from where God placed it. Isaiah simply applies that covenant logic to leadership structures.
Deborah is often cited as proof against this argument however the text itself says otherwise. Judges 4:8–9 Barak refuses to go to battle unless Deborah goes with him. Deborah responds: “I will surely go with you. Nevertheless, the road on which you are going will not lead to your glory, for the Lord will sell Sisera into the hand of a woman.” Her leadership is accompanied by: Male cowardice Loss of honor for Israel’s general National weakness before deliverance
Deborah is faithful, wise, and obedient. But the situation exists because men failed. God delivers Israel, but He does so in a way that publicly shames male leadership. Keep in mind in that society women weren't even considered reliable witnesses. It was shameful for the juice at that time to be under a woman's leadership and was emasculating. They knew they were under judgment.
Judges is a book where everything happens because “everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). Deborah’s judgeship fits that tragic pattern, not an ideal one.
The New Testament grounds leadership roles not in culture, but in creation order. 1 Timothy 2:12–14 “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man… For Adam was formed first, then Eve.” Paul appeals to creation, not Roman custom. When nations reject creation order, the Bible consistently treats that as moral and spiritual rebellion. 1 Corinthians 11:3 “The head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.” Headship is not oppression. It is structure. When structure collapses, judgment follows.
Scripture repeatedly associates judgment with: Weak rulers (Isaiah 3:4) Child rulers (Ecclesiastes 10:16) Role confusion (Romans 1:26–27) Rejection of God-ordained authority (Hosea 4:6) Women ruling over men fits this broader biblical category of disorder resulting from covenant unfaithfulness, not female inadequacy
To put bluntly: when God judges a nation, He does not always send fire. Sometimes He hands the steering wheel to people who were never meant to drive, and lets the crash teach the lesson.
As to your first objection... Are you saying that if something isn't repeated from the Old testament in the New testament then it's not valid? (That's certainly an unbiblical standard that you don't consistently hold to I hope) Because the case was already made in the OT and NOTHING in the NT contradicts that. That alone should be MORE than enough. But I'll back it up more....
The New Testament never redefines civil government from scratch. Romans 13:1 “There is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.” Paul does not describe a new kind of authority. He assumes the existing, biblically shaped understanding of rule. Roman rulers were not corrected on gender because the issue was not in dispute. Everyone already knew what rule looked like.
Likewise, the New Testament never forbids bestiality or incest either, not because those things became acceptable, but because they were already condemned by the moral law.
Civil authority is still headship and headship is grounded in creation. 1 Corinthians 11:3 “The head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.” This is not church only logic. It is cosmic order. Authority flows downward in patterned ways. The New Testament does not compartmentalize headship into church and home while leaving the state as a genderless free for all. Ephesians 5:23 “For the husband is the head of the wife.”
Paul grounds authority in creation, not in institutional boundaries. The state does not float above God’s created order like a philosophical blimp.
On top of that When Scripture speaks positively of rulers, the language is consistently male and paternal.
Isaiah 1:10 “Hear the word of the Lord, you rulers of Sodom.” 2 Samuel 23:3 “When one rules justly over men, ruling in the fear of God.” Proverbs 16:12 “It is an abomination to kings to do evil.”
Kings, fathers, shepherds, elders. Scripture does not sprinkle gender neutrality over civil authority. The imagery is consistent because the order is consistent.
The New Testament explicitly treats role reversal as a sign of judgment. Romans 1:21–27 Paul describes judgment not merely as bad behavior, but as God giving people over to disordered desires and roles. This mirrors the Old Testament pattern where judgment shows up as confusion rather than immediate destruction. Isaiah 3:12 “Women rule over them… your guides mislead you.”
The New Testament never repeals this logic. It intensifies it.
Deborah does not establish a norm. She highlights a failure. New Testament silence does not establish permission. It assumes continuity with the moral law and the created order. If silence established legitimacy, then the apostles accidentally endorsed a lot of pagan nonsense by not addressing it.
As for my statement about a disqualification, you're making a category error in your assessment. I was clearly talking about voting in and voluntarily selecting a woman ruler. That in itself is a rebellious action against God's order and it will be cursed.
Deborah wasn't voted in. She wasn't selected by the people. That's entirely different.
She stood where she is and that’s it.
A woman shouldn’t be president, and childless people shouldn’t be president.
Oh yeah baby...this is sweet! Thanks mm!
It's getting really hott.
u/#spicy
Bigly.
WOW, this is getting serious! 🔥The time has come, be afraid, be very afraid.
I love our Cabinet. May God bless them and continue to work through them and in them. 💕🙏
Head of the FBI in Georgia was forced out-----DS asset I believe!