PURKISS! Mr POOL is a SCAMMER who pushes Crypto scams AND FAKE HEALTH PRODUCTS on his telegram!
Please don't promote this guy! Take his message, verify it, because MR POOL makes shit up all the time like 3 days ago he said 100% of the Epstein files were public to everyone.
MR POOL IS A LIAR AND SCAMMER. STOP PROMOTING HIM!
His message is sometimes accurate, but HE IS A SCAMMER.
PURKISS! Mr POOL is a SCAMMER who pushes Crypto scams on his telegram!
Please don't promote this guy!
I dont promote anyone without saying so...ANYONE....
The three claims in the summary are broadly true based on recent reporting and official records, though each has some important context and nuances....
Rep. Jamie Raskin's Statement on Trump Mentions in Epstein FilesThis is accurate. On February 10, 2026, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, stated after viewing unredacted versions of the Epstein files that searching for terms like "Trump," "Donald," or "Don" yielded more than a million results across the approximately 3 million documents released by the Department of Justice under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
He clarified that this was a database search result, not a manual review of every hit, and many mentions likely stem from news clippings, emails, or other compiled materials in the files—some potentially unrelated or non-incriminating, such as public references to Trump in media articles about Epstein.
Raskin also highlighted "mysterious" or "unnecessary" redactions in the files, including some involving Trump, and criticized the DOJ for potentially shielding names without justification.
Conservative-leaning commentators and some Republicans have dismissed the claim as hyperbolic or politically motivated, arguing the high number reflects Trump's prominence rather than wrongdoing, while liberal outlets emphasize it as evidence of deeper ties.
No evidence suggests Raskin fabricated the search results, and multiple lawmakers from both parties have echoed concerns about redactions.2. Declassified Files on Trump's 2006 Interaction with Police Regarding EpsteinThis is also true and corroborated by a recently declassified FBI document released as part of the Epstein files. In an October 2019 FBI interview (summarized in a 302 report), former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter described a July 2006 phone call from then-private citizen Donald Trump, who was among the "very first people" to contact him after the Epstein investigation became public.
Trump reportedly expressed relief, saying "thank goodness you're stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this," and noted that people in New York knew Epstein was "disgusting." He called Ghislaine Maxwell "evil" (describing her as Epstein's "operative") and urged focus on her.
Fair point. I am just saying there have way too many MR. POOL x posts on here and this is the first one I have seen that is accurate. Other ones were spreading blatantly false information. I don't want to get to the point where people are just posting Mr Pool posts because they sound AMAZING. If we start karma farming this guy, while he has been putting out lies and is sketchy as hell on his telegram, at some point it is at least increasing his power and I get a bad feeling about him personally.
Anonymous MR POOL, reminds me of another anononymous person spreading lies https://x.com/QTHESTORMM while feeding the Q movement with Q like posts.
Yeah, Raskin is pure filth. I don't typically wish death on others...but it's too bad cancer didn't take that waste of oxygen/carbon out a couple years ago.
He's the only man I have ever seen who wore a head covering when losing his hair from chemo rather than just shaving his head and going about his day. What a fucking cunt.
i know they are demons but just for normies sake, what possible reason could Dems have for voting against tougher penalties for pedos, ESPECIALLY in the climate of Epstein files and public outrage???
So, is there a magic number that matters here, when it comes to being mentioned in the Epstein Files?
I've seen people being accused of child sex trafficking, cannibalism, murder, devil worshipping, just because their name was mentioned once or twice. Just because their names are in the file, no details on what the context was.
From what I understand, the number that concerns President Trump (his name explicitly, or in relation to Mar-a-Lago, or Melania Trump) is in the file around 30,000 times....
Is there a flow chart someone can show me where the number of times someone is mentioned actually matters and how we can discern who is guilty of what, based on the number of times they were mentioned?
Or is it all boiling down to "people we don't like are automatically guilty of heinous crimes if they're mentioned even once but people we like get a free pass no matter how many times they're mentioned or what it actually says they did"?
Because it's looking like the latter one there is the rule...
"Every Donald in 3 million documents. Every Donald Duck reference. Every McDonald’s receipt.
A million hits. Zero evidence.
Here’s what Raskin didn’t mention:
The same files contain an FBI interview with the Palm Beach Police Chief who confirmed Trump CALLED the police on Epstein in 2006.
Trump told him: “Thank goodness you’re stopping him. Everyone has known he’s been doing this.”
He called Maxwell “evil” and said “focus on her.”
He saw teenagers at Epstein’s and “got the hell out of there.”
He was one of the FIRST to call.
While Democrats searched for his name to build a headline — the files proved he tried to STOP it.
And while Raskin ran his mouth — every single Democrat in Wyoming voted AGAINST a bill imposing harsher penalties for sexual crimes against children.
Every. Single. One.
They searched 3 million files to frame the man who reported Epstein.
Then voted to protect child groomers.
Read that again. ⚡"
https://nitter.net/i/status/2021563874881777771
PURKISS! Mr POOL is a SCAMMER who pushes Crypto scams AND FAKE HEALTH PRODUCTS on his telegram!
Please don't promote this guy! Take his message, verify it, because MR POOL makes shit up all the time like 3 days ago he said 100% of the Epstein files were public to everyone.
MR POOL IS A LIAR AND SCAMMER. STOP PROMOTING HIM!
His message is sometimes accurate, but HE IS A SCAMMER.
Please don't promote this guy!
I dont promote anyone without saying so...ANYONE....
The three claims in the summary are broadly true based on recent reporting and official records, though each has some important context and nuances....
He clarified that this was a database search result, not a manual review of every hit, and many mentions likely stem from news clippings, emails, or other compiled materials in the files—some potentially unrelated or non-incriminating, such as public references to Trump in media articles about Epstein.
Raskin also highlighted "mysterious" or "unnecessary" redactions in the files, including some involving Trump, and criticized the DOJ for potentially shielding names without justification.
Conservative-leaning commentators and some Republicans have dismissed the claim as hyperbolic or politically motivated, arguing the high number reflects Trump's prominence rather than wrongdoing, while liberal outlets emphasize it as evidence of deeper ties.
No evidence suggests Raskin fabricated the search results, and multiple lawmakers from both parties have echoed concerns about redactions.2. Declassified Files on Trump's 2006 Interaction with Police Regarding EpsteinThis is also true and corroborated by a recently declassified FBI document released as part of the Epstein files. In an October 2019 FBI interview (summarized in a 302 report), former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter described a July 2006 phone call from then-private citizen Donald Trump, who was among the "very first people" to contact him after the Epstein investigation became public.
Trump reportedly expressed relief, saying "thank goodness you're stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this," and noted that people in New York knew Epstein was "disgusting." He called Ghislaine Maxwell "evil" (describing her as Epstein's "operative") and urged focus on her.
Fair point. I am just saying there have way too many MR. POOL x posts on here and this is the first one I have seen that is accurate. Other ones were spreading blatantly false information. I don't want to get to the point where people are just posting Mr Pool posts because they sound AMAZING. If we start karma farming this guy, while he has been putting out lies and is sketchy as hell on his telegram, at some point it is at least increasing his power and I get a bad feeling about him personally.
Anonymous MR POOL, reminds me of another anononymous person spreading lies https://x.com/QTHESTORMM while feeding the Q movement with Q like posts.
👍😉
Yeah, you just repeatedly repost their content, amplify their claims, and defend their credibility.
Call it whatever you want. Functionally, that’s promotion. 🙄
Whatever floats your boat Cupcake...
Ratskin is near the top of my list of Traitors who need to face Justice.
Yeah, Raskin is pure filth. I don't typically wish death on others...but it's too bad cancer didn't take that waste of oxygen/carbon out a couple years ago.
He's the only man I have ever seen who wore a head covering when losing his hair from chemo rather than just shaving his head and going about his day. What a fucking cunt.
I just couldn't have described him any better than that...TY.
Sue him into the poorhouse.
Sounds like multiple billion dollar lawsuits to me.
Cane here to say THIS ☝️
(((Raskin))) is super desperate to cover for his tribe.
Too late fucker, you’re just making it worse with your clumsy bullshit.
Our President should sue these people into oblivion.
👇👇👇👇👇
u/#fart
i know they are demons but just for normies sake, what possible reason could Dems have for voting against tougher penalties for pedos, ESPECIALLY in the climate of Epstein files and public outrage???
Trump will be mentioned on every demonrat email server. They hate him and he lives in their head rent free.
TDS dulls one's critical thinking abilities. We see it over and over.
Liars. That is all they do continually. Lie. Trump should sue him and everyone that reported it.
These people are stupid.
So, is there a magic number that matters here, when it comes to being mentioned in the Epstein Files?
I've seen people being accused of child sex trafficking, cannibalism, murder, devil worshipping, just because their name was mentioned once or twice. Just because their names are in the file, no details on what the context was.
From what I understand, the number that concerns President Trump (his name explicitly, or in relation to Mar-a-Lago, or Melania Trump) is in the file around 30,000 times....
Is there a flow chart someone can show me where the number of times someone is mentioned actually matters and how we can discern who is guilty of what, based on the number of times they were mentioned?
Or is it all boiling down to "people we don't like are automatically guilty of heinous crimes if they're mentioned even once but people we like get a free pass no matter how many times they're mentioned or what it actually says they did"?
Because it's looking like the latter one there is the rule...