If the information here by Ferguson is accurate, (if), it's strong evidence, imo, that Iran is and has always been a Cabal proxy state.
I'm not certain that CCP China is the real primary enemy here. I think the Cabal would like to pit the US against China, but the Globalists fear China as well.
However, it makes no sense for Iran to strike out at their neighbors. There is zero benefit here to the Iranian regime. They are either insane (a distinct possibility) or they are in fact the puppet instruments of the Cabal. The banking Cabal that is in the shadows, the one that controlled US presidents and people like Clinton, (and DS Israel for that matter), they want destruction and chaos. They want to somehow hurt Trump and the US, and anyone (i.e. russia) who is actually against the Satanic globalist.
I think these attacks by Iran are prima facie evidence that this is about Trump's USA against the Cabal.
That is a good distinct possibility. But don't discount the idea that China is a party to that same Cabal system. The CCP is totally evil through and through - and that includes Xi. They have been one of the biggest supporters of Iran and their insane reign of terror. Iran is a proxy for China. But even China can't really control them, but they are perfectly willing to use them just the same. They have the same common enemy and right now that is Trump. The difference is in their approach. China prefers to use more covert action to try and stay in the shadows all while pulling the strings.
Iran is lashing out at everyone they can hit. It's what despotic regimes do when they think they are going down. As a final act of desperation they try and take as many with them as they can.
I'm not confident that we can say that this is 'what they do'. I think more normally, when a despotic regime goes down, they try to flee the situation and save their own skins.
Look at people like Hitler and Mussolini of recent times - Hitler especially. Often they will burn the house down rather than give in. Yes, some can try to find an exit if they are able whether that is by their own death or physically extracting themselves leaving a lot of suffering in their wake. Before they exercise an exit strategy, it is often associated with almost utter destruction of the countries and people forced to live under them. When faced with what they perceive as a no way out situation, they will take others down with them in a final blaze of glory. Look at some of the Roman emperors for example - the madman Nero comes to mind. He left Rome in a state of financial and political ruin before he committed suicide rather than be taken, or worse, murdered. Caligula is another example.
There were a few others as well. Even Herod the Great left orders that upon his death hundreds, if not thousands, were ordered to be killed so that there would be mourning at his funeral throughout the land of Israel. He didn't want celebrations in the streets at the news of his death. Thankfully those orders were not carried out. These stories have been repeated across time and location throughout history and it is not unusual for leaders that have seized ultimate centralized power that lies in the hands of a single person. There is no accountability or system of checks and balances to their power. They all seem to share a narcissistic psychopathic type personality and they rule by fear because they lack any other legitimacy to their rule. The Islamic regime is simply another example of authoritarian rule faced with its own demise.
And the fact that Iran forces are firing in all directions basically, even absent leadership - which means this was all pre-planned operations for years, so that if ever attacked they would lash out at everyone around. A terrorist regime from top to bottom.
This should only prove to doubters how dangerous and threatening to the entire world they were(but of course critics will ignore any and all logic). The whole 'they just said they wanted a peaceful nuclear program US is a jerk for attacking them over a made up weapons program' bullshit should be put to rest after this.
More and more, I'm leaning that way, although the actual nature of the system of which the BoE Cabal is a part is hard to pin down. It's a mess, for sure, but what the Prometheans are talking about makes a LOT of sense and for me has become another part of the puzzle.
If the information here by Ferguson is accurate, (if), it's strong evidence, imo, that Iran is and has always been a Cabal proxy state.
I'm not certain that CCP China is the real primary enemy here. I think the Cabal would like to pit the US against China, but the Globalists fear China as well.
However, it makes no sense for Iran to strike out at their neighbors. There is zero benefit here to the Iranian regime. They are either insane (a distinct possibility) or they are in fact the puppet instruments of the Cabal. The banking Cabal that is in the shadows, the one that controlled US presidents and people like Clinton, (and DS Israel for that matter), they want destruction and chaos. They want to somehow hurt Trump and the US, and anyone (i.e. russia) who is actually against the Satanic globalist.
I think these attacks by Iran are prima facie evidence that this is about Trump's USA against the Cabal.
That is a good distinct possibility. But don't discount the idea that China is a party to that same Cabal system. The CCP is totally evil through and through - and that includes Xi. They have been one of the biggest supporters of Iran and their insane reign of terror. Iran is a proxy for China. But even China can't really control them, but they are perfectly willing to use them just the same. They have the same common enemy and right now that is Trump. The difference is in their approach. China prefers to use more covert action to try and stay in the shadows all while pulling the strings.
Iran is lashing out at everyone they can hit. It's what despotic regimes do when they think they are going down. As a final act of desperation they try and take as many with them as they can.
Can you think of other examples of this?
I'm not confident that we can say that this is 'what they do'. I think more normally, when a despotic regime goes down, they try to flee the situation and save their own skins.
Look at people like Hitler and Mussolini of recent times - Hitler especially. Often they will burn the house down rather than give in. Yes, some can try to find an exit if they are able whether that is by their own death or physically extracting themselves leaving a lot of suffering in their wake. Before they exercise an exit strategy, it is often associated with almost utter destruction of the countries and people forced to live under them. When faced with what they perceive as a no way out situation, they will take others down with them in a final blaze of glory. Look at some of the Roman emperors for example - the madman Nero comes to mind. He left Rome in a state of financial and political ruin before he committed suicide rather than be taken, or worse, murdered. Caligula is another example.
There were a few others as well. Even Herod the Great left orders that upon his death hundreds, if not thousands, were ordered to be killed so that there would be mourning at his funeral throughout the land of Israel. He didn't want celebrations in the streets at the news of his death. Thankfully those orders were not carried out. These stories have been repeated across time and location throughout history and it is not unusual for leaders that have seized ultimate centralized power that lies in the hands of a single person. There is no accountability or system of checks and balances to their power. They all seem to share a narcissistic psychopathic type personality and they rule by fear because they lack any other legitimacy to their rule. The Islamic regime is simply another example of authoritarian rule faced with its own demise.
And the fact that Iran forces are firing in all directions basically, even absent leadership - which means this was all pre-planned operations for years, so that if ever attacked they would lash out at everyone around. A terrorist regime from top to bottom.
This should only prove to doubters how dangerous and threatening to the entire world they were(but of course critics will ignore any and all logic). The whole 'they just said they wanted a peaceful nuclear program US is a jerk for attacking them over a made up weapons program' bullshit should be put to rest after this.
Death Blossom
Ah, those were the days. <reminisces>
Where's Bolton?
...look to the Bank of England Cabal
More and more, I'm leaning that way, although the actual nature of the system of which the BoE Cabal is a part is hard to pin down. It's a mess, for sure, but what the Prometheans are talking about makes a LOT of sense and for me has become another part of the puzzle.