"๐ง๐จ๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ก'๐ฆ ๐ช๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐ช๐ฆ...This is not a pattern of mistakes. Mistakes go in different directions. ๐ง๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ."
(twitter.com)
๐ธ WAG THE FROG ๐ธ
Because people on here have borderline Tucker and Candace derangement syndrome. And they seem to attack them and not really the ideas.
I do not need to listen to Candace Owens to come to the conclusion that the Charlie Kirk official narrative is bullshit and Erika Kirk is shady. People on Instagram and X blew that shit up within days. Yet I have seen people on here act like itโs solely a Candace conspiracy theory.
But there is a growing divide here about who runs the show. City of London or Israel/Talmudic Jews. There is also a divide on what MAGA and America First means. There is also a lack of understanding how Non Q people think.
Can you blame people for being skeptical with the Charlie Kirk lie, a war going on in Iran and Trump saying there will be no mass deportations? If you didnโt follow Q why would you think things are different?
I think a lot of people on here are in an echo chamber. Voter morale especially for my age group Gen Z and young millennials is pretty low. The Charlie Kirk investigation and the Epstein file handling has broke a lot of support for Trump for people my age. And unless something changes I donโt see young male conservatives showing up in the mid terms. We have a couple of issues we wonโt compromise on and immigration legal and illegal being the biggest one. And Trump needs us. We were one of the biggest demographics to come out for him.
That is not dooming that is just a fact go talk to Gen Z and millennial conservative males.
Not sure what morale is like for Gen X and Boomers.
And you donโt need to listen to Candace, Tucker or Nick Fuentes to understand that. I donโt listen to Furentes or Candace. If the guest is interesting I will listen to Tucker.
This Iran thing will be interesting. If Trump can wrap it up with minimal casualties then it could help him but if boots go on the ground it will be spicy.
You can claim a lot of things, but there has never been a divide about what MAGA or America First means. It means an American republic free from all external influences, and I dont mean just one or two but all.
And that is exactly what Trump is doing, freeing America (and by extension the world) from all forms of control - some overt like the Israel influence, and some far more covert like the elaborate system of control spun by the British Banksters.
Every person with a thinking brain knows the official narrative is bullshit. BUT, what Candace capitalises on is by focusing on only one theory of what could be the real story and carefully avoid examining every other possibility - like for instance it was a sting operation / witness protection.
I followed these threads. These threads are exactly like how the lefties attack Trump. They take a lot of things out of context and connect them all together and you are left with the reeling feeling that Trump must be evil. All it takes is to pull one thread and find its just a narrative. Everytime I see a fake claim about her, I know this is an orchestrated attack.
A more discerning Anon would ask this question: What is it anyone could gain by attacking Erika? The answer is not as much of a mystery as some thing. The attack is actually aimed at Trump's succession.
What claim about Erika is wrong?
Make the claims and I can answer the question. And no, I am not interested in narratives or "I am just asking questions". Actual claims, like:
Erika is XYZ or Erika did XYZ where XYZ is demonstrably evil and through implications.
๐๐๐๐๐
I'm on here daily and I've never heard this, only the opposite - not saying it is or isn't so, just seeking sauce, thx
Consider the possibility that City of London or Israel/Talmudic Jews are one and the same.
Morale....
Fixed
This is one of your better, and more restrained (๐ ) comments on here, and as much as I, definitely a more optimistic viewer, want to disagree, I don't. Not completely, anyway.
I see your generation freaking out, often in conversation with shills and bots, but still... What you say is true.
I guess where my optimism leads me is that I believe Trump will address your issues. The entire 3rd term has been a wave of cyclical revelations that, to me, is clearly based on timing and deprogramming as much as direct action. I still have faith and I'm cozy... But I realize I'm cozy from a position of personal, internal Faith, capital F, that many don't have, and I can see why many are upset and anxious for reconciliation .
Anyway, keep your head up and don't forget to shine when your peers are in the dark.
WWG1WGA
Edit: As far as Tucker goes, I like him, but I haven't used him as a source of primary information in months.
I am trying to be less off a hot head and yeah I donโt doom as much as people my age.
I would only disagree that it is mostly bots and shills. A lot of it is organic. Being my age I obviously talk to these people in real life.
I donโt think they understand things like the Samson option. The Iran thing is hard because optically it does look like we are doing this solely for Israel. I try to bring the angle that for the invasion of Europe to be ended one of the things that needs to happen is peace in the Middle East.
But yeah the immigration issue is huge for my generation. Particularly because I know people who have been discriminated against in favor of H1-Bโs.
I was born in '76, hence my username. I remember asking my parents why the TV kept talking about sausages."Not sausages, hostages." "Then what's a hostage?" Iran has been treating us like crap for nearly my entire life, so I support seeing their leadership get destroyed regardless of it benefitting Israel.
The CIA tried to install Mosaddeck as PM of Iran, but he turned out to be a real asshole, so Iran got rid of him and reinstated the Shah. The CIA tried to take credit for this, but they were a part of the problem. Then later the CIA put Ayatollah Khomeini or however you spell his shithead name these days to depose the shah. I thnk American, Israeli, and British intelligence had much to gain from having that psychopath in charge of Iran. He could be a perpetual boogeyman to scare people with, making a reason to grab more money and toss at him while the Iranian people suffered and politicians and such profited from it. Iran took several more Americans hostage while Biden was president too. Not only that, but they have been causing plenty of problems with their neighbors like KSA too, funding terrorists in Yemen to fight them and such.
So Iran has been at war with the USA for quite a while. The way I see it, I would think that having them around for Israel to bitch about would be more to their benefit and to keep the charade going. Obama and Biden sent tons of money to Iran, while Trump kept striking off their multiple, evil heads. And now finally Khomeni is gone. I'm glad. I think Israel just wanted to keep military operations going in Iran, but not do a thing to Khomeni. So now, whatever Israel thinks they can gain with Khomeni gone, I hope they do not get it.
Interesting perspective. I think people my age would benefit from hearing it.