Sorry, literally in the first MINUTE he says that not only will Trump send in troops but that he’ll institute the draft.
What exactly did you find interesting about this and why? Is it too much to ask that people not simply post videos with simple titles but also provide a synopsis or at least why they thought it relevant or helpful before asking others to spend an hour or more of their life watching something random just cause you said it was interesting?
And John, it’s not like you aren’t know for super high quality posts, my man. Come on. You’ve got a reputation as one of the good ones. Don’t go clickbait on us now ;)
Sadly the guy in the video glazes over the historic Christian position of post millennialism.
That position doesn't require anything of Israel or Temple. The only thing that matters is if you're in Christ.
There's also not an end of the world in that eschatological position. All you have is the end of the age which happened in 70 AD with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple and the end of the sacrificial system. Besides that all that's left is final judgement were evil is removed from the Earth and those in Christ remain just like in the days of Noah with the ark.
This video explores how the ongoing US-Iran conflict and broader Middle Eastern tensions are deeply intertwined with divergent religious eschatologies (end-of-world beliefs) across Jewish, Christian, Islamic, and other traditions. The speaker emphasizes that purely geopolitical or political explanations fall short of understanding the war without considering these eschatological narratives that shape motivations and predicted outcomes. He introduces the Law of Eschatological Convergence, which highlights where different religious worldview scripts align—especially around the destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the building of the Third Temple—and frames the conflict as part of a larger apocalyptic design involving prepping for a Messianic or final battle scenario. The video is suitable for viewers interested in geopolitics, religious studies, and conflict analysis, offering insights into how religious ideologies influence international war dynamics and future world order projections.
Timeline Summary
00:00 - 04:20: Introduction to War Predictions and Current Conflict Context
The speaker outlines three main predictions: US ground troops involvement leading to a draft, no use of tactical nukes, and destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Senator Blumenthal’s briefing reveals US uncertainty and Russian involvement in aiding Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister defiantly acknowledges preparedness for US ground invasion. The segment highlights a disconnect within US policy circles about the potential for defeat.
04:20 - 08:13: Israeli Religious-Political Influences
Introduction of Rabbi Schneerson (Lubavitch leader) and Benjamin Netanyahu’s interaction, illustrating how religious objectives intersect with Israeli politics. Netanyahu is focused on “speeding up” the arrival of the Messiah by advancing political-religious goals. Netanyahu’s reading about “Jews vs Rome” symbolizes opposition likely aimed at the US.
08:14 - 14:00: Christian Zionist Perspectives and Temple Mount Significance
Peter Hessf (US Secretary of War) discusses miracles linked to Israel’s history leading to speculation about rebuilding the Third Temple. A rabbi’s comment suggests staging attacks on the Al-Aqsa Mosque to provoke intra-Arab conflict. This underscores religious narratives driving military and political strategies, pointing to the mosque’s destruction as a key conflict milestone.
14:01 - 19:20: Religious Eschatology and Its Role in Conflict
Introduction of the “Law of Eschatological Convergence” used to analyze the war from a religious perspective. The speaker explains how eschatologies provide scripts for societies, dictating coordinated action toward end-times goals. A brief explanation of game theory concepts—mass, energy, coordination—is used to highlight the importance of shared narratives in successful group strategies, with eschatology as the most potent narrative form.
19:21 - 29:35: Extreme Eschatologies and Historical Coordination (Lubavitch Example)
The speaker illustrates how extreme religious groups (accelerationists) actively push timelines for the Messiah’s return, diverging from mainstream faith. He recounts a detailed historical example of global coordination in 1939 to rescue a leading rabbi from Nazi Poland, showcasing how eschatological commitment enables transcending political and national barriers for shared goals.
29:36 - 42:06: Overview of Major Religious Eschatologies Impacting the Conflict
Detailed survey of eschatologies:
Zoroastrianism (Persian) with final battle between light and darkness.
Jewish eschatology centering on redemption, Messiah, and Third Temple.
Christian Zionism adapting Jewish beliefs but viewing Jewish Messiah as Antichrist, emphasizing Jesus’ return.
Freemasons’ vision of “Pax Judea,” a one-world AI surveillance empire.
Islamic eschatology opposing Pax Judea, awaiting Jesus and Imam Mahdi’s victory.
Catholic eschatology focusing on the City of God and demise of the Anglo-American order.
Orthodox (Russian) eschatology envisioning Moscow as the Third Rome and a new world order.
42:07 - 52:58: Points of Eschatological Convergence and Predicted Consequences
The key convergences:
Achievement of Greater Israel and Pax Judea one-world government.
Destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque to build the Third Temple.
Rise in anti-Semitism prompting Jewish return to Israel.
The War of Gog and Magog as a climactic global conflict.
Likely collapse or insignificance of the US and China, with predictions of US civil conflict.
These convergences help forecast geopolitical shifts in the next 2-4 years.
52:59 - 59:45: Specific War and Political Predictions
Predictions include US deployment of ground troops leading to civil unrest and a national draft, the economic collapse of GCC states, Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s involvement with heavy losses, the rise of Iran’s Persian identity, and Israel’s territorial expansion and technological dominance. The Russian war in Ukraine is positioned as part of Orthodox prophecy aiming to dissolve Europe and NATO.
59:46 - 01:05:48: Q&A and Summary on War Complexity
A question compares Trump’s Iran policy to failures in Venezuela, stressing a political (not religious) lens. The speaker acknowledges this but insists the same outcomes coincide with eschatological narratives. He explains the strategic importance of the Middle East geography and economy, why US can’t simply withdraw without collapse, and how the war perpetuates itself. Ends with an invitation to continue the discussion next week.
Key Points
🕊️ Religious Narratives Drive Geopolitical Events: The war is influenced not just by realpolitik but by colliding eschatologies shaping each actor’s motivations and strategies.
🔥 Destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque as a Pivotal Event: Seen across multiple traditions as prerequisite for the Third Temple and apocalyptic events, making its destruction a predicted and central war outcome.
📜 Eschatology as a Coordinating ‘Script’: Provides detailed societal scripts transcending generations and borders, leading committed groups to coordinated, purposeful action in line with their end-times vision.
⚙️ Game Theory Application: Coordination, energy, and mass determine success; narrative (eschatology) enhances coordination, which is crucial in conflict outcomes.
🌍 Predicted Future Developments: Includes US ground troop deployment/civil unrest, GCC collapse, rise of Israel and Iran, destruction of Europe/NATO, and US-China decline aligning with converging eschatological aims.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why is the destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque predicted in this conflict? A: It is seen as necessary by many eschatological traditions to allow rebuilding of the Third Temple, a key event tied to messianic expectations and the unfolding apocalypse.
Q: How do religious beliefs influence the strategic decisions of countries involved? A: Religious end-time narratives provide actors with motivation and scripts guiding their actions beyond purely political or military logic.
Q: What is the Law of Eschatological Convergence? A: It is a theory that different religious eschatologies converge on certain goals/events, allowing prediction of combined geopolitical outcomes from these points of overlap.
Q: Will the US use ground troops and institute a draft in this war? A: According to the speaker’s prediction, yes, this is likely and will trigger significant domestic unrest and possibly civil conflict.
Q: What happens if the war ends without destroying the Al-Aqsa Mosque? A: The speaker states his model would be invalidated, as this event is central to the predicted apocalyptic narrative driving the conflict.
Conclusion
This presentation demonstrates that understanding the US-Iran war and broader Middle Eastern dynamics requires integrating religious eschatology with geopolitical analysis. The conflict is not merely about territory or resources but about fulfilling interlocking prophetic narratives that shape actions and outcomes. The Law of Eschatological Convergence provides a powerful lens to foresee major political and spiritual shifts, including the destruction of key religious sites, the reordering of global powers, and eventual apocalyptic warfare. The speaker concludes that ignoring the religious dimension leaves us unable to grasp the true stakes and eventual trajectory of these complex conflicts.
Action suggestions: For policymakers, analysts, and observers, incorporating religious narratives and eschatological motivations into strategic planning and conflict resolution efforts is crucial. Keeping track of eschatological markers—such as actions on the Temple Mount—may provide critical early warnings about escalations or peace potential. Students and researchers should further explore how apocalyptic worldviews influence international relations to better anticipate global shifts in the coming years.
I can tell you there is a BIBLICAL CONVERGANCE 100000000000%
Governments need to know or understand those peoples religious positions, common sense there.
At the end of the day every human wants to be taken care of.
God put WATCHERS over us called Politicians, simple enough to understand now. Have ya seen any fall lately 😁🍿
Simple Story given to us that has been so distorted it's stupid anymore...hence why people left church's and religions.
Do you not think everything in front of you is described in the Bible but you keep putting into some Fantasy that seems to never meet reality. When the fact is it's all right before you happening. Trump told you, WE HAVE IT ALL. I just don't think people really believe Him.
“key event tied to messianic expectations and the unfolding apocalypse”
“Apocalypse” sounds pretty scary, but it’s just Greek for “revelation”, which is just a form of “what was/is/willbe revealed”.
Focus on Sanctification + Grace/Mercy, as that’s the path through.
Philippians 2:12 - So then, my beloved, even as you have always obeyed, not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
I appreciate the sentiment in your last sentence, but would point out in love that salvation is through faith in Christ alone, that He is Lord and that His bloodshed atone for all of our sins.
There’s no “part” that we can do our best in. Instead, Christ saves us first, and then we try to do good and are sanctified as an act of worship and gratitude for what Jesus has already accomplished on our behalf. “Faith without works is dead”.
When I get to Heaven and the Lord asks why he should let me in, I will humbly say by Christ alone - it was His obedience that covers me.
When I get to Heaven and the Lord asks why he should let me in, I will humbly say by Christ alone - it was His obedience that covers me.
Absolutely. You’re right, that last sentence was worded poorly. It was intended in correction to the concept of, “just ask for salvation and that’s all that ever needs to happen” that’s been going around - exactly as noted, “faith without works is dead”, but also “not by works, lest any man should boast.”
It’s always funny how difficult it can be to communicate things correctly.
First minute, some lunatic says Trump is going to institute a national draft.
It's not an "interesting take", unless you hate Trump and are eager to see how quickly his support is universally withdrawn from instituting something that would be so wildly unpopular.
How in the world does JohnTitor17 get raw sewage like this stickied?
I used something called discernment. Why don't you have any?
The point of the OP is not about his individual minor conclusion(s)
It's not a minor conclusion though, is it? If Trump were to initiate a draft tomorrow, do you think it would be a minor issue, or THE defining issue of his entire presidency? That's a rhetorical question.
Valuable insight can be gained from people even if you don't agree with
And that tosses discernment right out the window. Continuing to listen to someone who is wrong because they might eventually say something right is ridiculous.
He can wrong about a DRAFT, and a few other points inconsequential to the BIG PICTURE, but STILL be correct regarding the overarching theme: Eschatology informs one of what to expect.
That was the point of the OP.
The mods were intelligent enough to parse that without me needing to explain it to them like they are five.
Probably because they have good reading/listening comprehension.
I know you think it's just a hollow insult, but I mean it when I say that if you had better comprehension skills then you wouldn't have all these problems understanding things adults talk about.
Thanks for letting me have the last word.
He can wrong about a DRAFT, and a few other points inconsequential
when I say that if you had better comprehension skills
You think it's inconsequential when bad information precedes good information. That's why you would flippantly predict a tidal wave and have this confused pikachu face when many discount everything you say thereafter.
That's your whole schtick. Flood the market with information, some good some bad, let things stick to the wall when it can (yay me I get praised) and disregard all criticism when you're wrong.
Alex Jones has a job. His job is to mix the truth with such a ridiculous persona that people will not believe the truth if for no other reason than it came from the mouth of someone so ridiculous.
Well your friend you posted a link to, his opinion on the draft is so out there and ridiculous that nothing else he says should be given a grain of salt. It does the truth no favors to be conflated with lies and ridiculousness.
Alright I'm going to throw this wild conspiracy out there.
Bibi Netanyahu said he controlled President Trump.
What if he held the Samson Option over Trump?
For those of you who may not have heard of this, basically an atomic weapon would be detonated if the
US decides to turn against and I hate to use the word Israel because this is not Israel anymore, they are Edom. Descendants of Esau.
but if the US decides to turn on Edom and in response they would ignite one or many more nuclear weapons.
US forces are on the ground in Iran.
Bases are closed in the US because of sleeper cells.
So what if the US "slips" Iran some of our firepower to use on Edom?
Each book of the Old Testament is a testament to how the leaders of the church degraded and became 'The Whore', were replaced, demonized in a crusade of sorts or an inquisition, and the cycle begins again.
The theory that apocalyptic religion is, in modern times, the underlying cause of this and most wars is sound. Theocracies are not democracies, so choose your poison.
Sorry, literally in the first MINUTE he says that not only will Trump send in troops but that he’ll institute the draft.
What exactly did you find interesting about this and why? Is it too much to ask that people not simply post videos with simple titles but also provide a synopsis or at least why they thought it relevant or helpful before asking others to spend an hour or more of their life watching something random just cause you said it was interesting?
And John, it’s not like you aren’t know for super high quality posts, my man. Come on. You’ve got a reputation as one of the good ones. Don’t go clickbait on us now ;)
You can skip the guys predictions of future events entirely.
The real meat on the bone is how the view of different religious end times positions drives different parties to different goals.
This is critical motivational information to understand.
Correct. Thank you for saying what I should've pointed out at the beginning.
Sadly the guy in the video glazes over the historic Christian position of post millennialism.
That position doesn't require anything of Israel or Temple. The only thing that matters is if you're in Christ.
There's also not an end of the world in that eschatological position. All you have is the end of the age which happened in 70 AD with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple and the end of the sacrificial system. Besides that all that's left is final judgement were evil is removed from the Earth and those in Christ remain just like in the days of Noah with the ark.
I'm with ya
That blew my mind!
Timestamp?
I do not endorse everything he says.
Clearly he could be wrong about a lot.
Focus on the main point.
How Eschatology (essentially religious prophecy) is converging (coming together/materializing) on the World Stage.
Wether this convergence is 'naturally occurring' or crafted is irrelevant to the OP.
Gotcha. Yeah it could be argued that all prophecies are self-fulfilling in a way. Makes you think.
Also, Blumenthal & Fake news.
Btw thanks for the kind words :)
Summary https://decopy.ai/youtube-video-summarizer/
This video explores how the ongoing US-Iran conflict and broader Middle Eastern tensions are deeply intertwined with divergent religious eschatologies (end-of-world beliefs) across Jewish, Christian, Islamic, and other traditions. The speaker emphasizes that purely geopolitical or political explanations fall short of understanding the war without considering these eschatological narratives that shape motivations and predicted outcomes. He introduces the Law of Eschatological Convergence, which highlights where different religious worldview scripts align—especially around the destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the building of the Third Temple—and frames the conflict as part of a larger apocalyptic design involving prepping for a Messianic or final battle scenario. The video is suitable for viewers interested in geopolitics, religious studies, and conflict analysis, offering insights into how religious ideologies influence international war dynamics and future world order projections.
Timeline Summary
00:00 - 04:20: Introduction to War Predictions and Current Conflict Context
The speaker outlines three main predictions: US ground troops involvement leading to a draft, no use of tactical nukes, and destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Senator Blumenthal’s briefing reveals US uncertainty and Russian involvement in aiding Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister defiantly acknowledges preparedness for US ground invasion. The segment highlights a disconnect within US policy circles about the potential for defeat.
04:20 - 08:13: Israeli Religious-Political Influences
Introduction of Rabbi Schneerson (Lubavitch leader) and Benjamin Netanyahu’s interaction, illustrating how religious objectives intersect with Israeli politics. Netanyahu is focused on “speeding up” the arrival of the Messiah by advancing political-religious goals. Netanyahu’s reading about “Jews vs Rome” symbolizes opposition likely aimed at the US.
08:14 - 14:00: Christian Zionist Perspectives and Temple Mount Significance
Peter Hessf (US Secretary of War) discusses miracles linked to Israel’s history leading to speculation about rebuilding the Third Temple. A rabbi’s comment suggests staging attacks on the Al-Aqsa Mosque to provoke intra-Arab conflict. This underscores religious narratives driving military and political strategies, pointing to the mosque’s destruction as a key conflict milestone.
14:01 - 19:20: Religious Eschatology and Its Role in Conflict
Introduction of the “Law of Eschatological Convergence” used to analyze the war from a religious perspective. The speaker explains how eschatologies provide scripts for societies, dictating coordinated action toward end-times goals. A brief explanation of game theory concepts—mass, energy, coordination—is used to highlight the importance of shared narratives in successful group strategies, with eschatology as the most potent narrative form.
19:21 - 29:35: Extreme Eschatologies and Historical Coordination (Lubavitch Example)
The speaker illustrates how extreme religious groups (accelerationists) actively push timelines for the Messiah’s return, diverging from mainstream faith. He recounts a detailed historical example of global coordination in 1939 to rescue a leading rabbi from Nazi Poland, showcasing how eschatological commitment enables transcending political and national barriers for shared goals.
29:36 - 42:06: Overview of Major Religious Eschatologies Impacting the Conflict
Detailed survey of eschatologies:
42:07 - 52:58: Points of Eschatological Convergence and Predicted Consequences
The key convergences:
These convergences help forecast geopolitical shifts in the next 2-4 years.
52:59 - 59:45: Specific War and Political Predictions
Predictions include US deployment of ground troops leading to civil unrest and a national draft, the economic collapse of GCC states, Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s involvement with heavy losses, the rise of Iran’s Persian identity, and Israel’s territorial expansion and technological dominance. The Russian war in Ukraine is positioned as part of Orthodox prophecy aiming to dissolve Europe and NATO.
59:46 - 01:05:48: Q&A and Summary on War Complexity
A question compares Trump’s Iran policy to failures in Venezuela, stressing a political (not religious) lens. The speaker acknowledges this but insists the same outcomes coincide with eschatological narratives. He explains the strategic importance of the Middle East geography and economy, why US can’t simply withdraw without collapse, and how the war perpetuates itself. Ends with an invitation to continue the discussion next week.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why is the destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque predicted in this conflict?
A: It is seen as necessary by many eschatological traditions to allow rebuilding of the Third Temple, a key event tied to messianic expectations and the unfolding apocalypse.
Q: How do religious beliefs influence the strategic decisions of countries involved?
A: Religious end-time narratives provide actors with motivation and scripts guiding their actions beyond purely political or military logic.
Q: What is the Law of Eschatological Convergence?
A: It is a theory that different religious eschatologies converge on certain goals/events, allowing prediction of combined geopolitical outcomes from these points of overlap.
Q: Will the US use ground troops and institute a draft in this war?
A: According to the speaker’s prediction, yes, this is likely and will trigger significant domestic unrest and possibly civil conflict.
Q: What happens if the war ends without destroying the Al-Aqsa Mosque?
A: The speaker states his model would be invalidated, as this event is central to the predicted apocalyptic narrative driving the conflict.
Conclusion
This presentation demonstrates that understanding the US-Iran war and broader Middle Eastern dynamics requires integrating religious eschatology with geopolitical analysis. The conflict is not merely about territory or resources but about fulfilling interlocking prophetic narratives that shape actions and outcomes. The Law of Eschatological Convergence provides a powerful lens to foresee major political and spiritual shifts, including the destruction of key religious sites, the reordering of global powers, and eventual apocalyptic warfare. The speaker concludes that ignoring the religious dimension leaves us unable to grasp the true stakes and eventual trajectory of these complex conflicts.
Action suggestions: For policymakers, analysts, and observers, incorporating religious narratives and eschatological motivations into strategic planning and conflict resolution efforts is crucial. Keeping track of eschatological markers—such as actions on the Temple Mount—may provide critical early warnings about escalations or peace potential. Students and researchers should further explore how apocalyptic worldviews influence international relations to better anticipate global shifts in the coming years.
Thanks so much for posting that breakdown anon!
Now I don't have to waste any time on this futurefagging (another word invented, just for this sentence :) hogwash.
I can tell you there is a BIBLICAL CONVERGANCE 100000000000%
Governments need to know or understand those peoples religious positions, common sense there.
At the end of the day every human wants to be taken care of.
God put WATCHERS over us called Politicians, simple enough to understand now. Have ya seen any fall lately 😁🍿
Simple Story given to us that has been so distorted it's stupid anymore...hence why people left church's and religions.
Do you not think everything in front of you is described in the Bible but you keep putting into some Fantasy that seems to never meet reality. When the fact is it's all right before you happening. Trump told you, WE HAVE IT ALL. I just don't think people really believe Him.
This guy is full of s__t.
“key event tied to messianic expectations and the unfolding apocalypse”
“Apocalypse” sounds pretty scary, but it’s just Greek for “revelation”, which is just a form of “what was/is/willbe revealed”.
Focus on Sanctification + Grace/Mercy, as that’s the path through.
Philippians 2:12 - So then, my beloved, even as you have always obeyed, not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
We do our best, and Christ covers the gap.
I appreciate the sentiment in your last sentence, but would point out in love that salvation is through faith in Christ alone, that He is Lord and that His bloodshed atone for all of our sins.
There’s no “part” that we can do our best in. Instead, Christ saves us first, and then we try to do good and are sanctified as an act of worship and gratitude for what Jesus has already accomplished on our behalf. “Faith without works is dead”.
When I get to Heaven and the Lord asks why he should let me in, I will humbly say by Christ alone - it was His obedience that covers me.
Absolutely. You’re right, that last sentence was worded poorly. It was intended in correction to the concept of, “just ask for salvation and that’s all that ever needs to happen” that’s been going around - exactly as noted, “faith without works is dead”, but also “not by works, lest any man should boast.”
It’s always funny how difficult it can be to communicate things correctly.
Is he a leftist? Sounds like it.
What the hell was that.
First minute, some lunatic says Trump is going to institute a national draft.
It's not an "interesting take", unless you hate Trump and are eager to see how quickly his support is universally withdrawn from instituting something that would be so wildly unpopular.
How in the world does JohnTitor17 get raw sewage like this stickied?
You'll never get it.
First try to develop your reading comprehension skills.
The point of the OP is not about his individual minor conclusion(s) , which needn't be accurate in and of themselves, but the overarching big picture.
Translation: Valuable insight can be gained from people even if you don't agree with every single thing they say.
I used something called discernment. Why don't you have any?
It's not a minor conclusion though, is it? If Trump were to initiate a draft tomorrow, do you think it would be a minor issue, or THE defining issue of his entire presidency? That's a rhetorical question.
And that tosses discernment right out the window. Continuing to listen to someone who is wrong because they might eventually say something right is ridiculous.
He can wrong about a DRAFT, and a few other points inconsequential to the BIG PICTURE, but STILL be correct regarding the overarching theme: Eschatology informs one of what to expect.
That was the point of the OP.
The mods were intelligent enough to parse that without me needing to explain it to them like they are five.
Probably because they have good reading/listening comprehension.
I know you think it's just a hollow insult, but I mean it when I say that if you had better comprehension skills then you wouldn't have all these problems understanding things adults talk about.
Thanks for letting me have the last word.
You think it's inconsequential when bad information precedes good information. That's why you would flippantly predict a tidal wave and have this confused pikachu face when many discount everything you say thereafter.
That's your whole schtick. Flood the market with information, some good some bad, let things stick to the wall when it can (yay me I get praised) and disregard all criticism when you're wrong.
Alex Jones has a job. His job is to mix the truth with such a ridiculous persona that people will not believe the truth if for no other reason than it came from the mouth of someone so ridiculous.
Well your friend you posted a link to, his opinion on the draft is so out there and ridiculous that nothing else he says should be given a grain of salt. It does the truth no favors to be conflated with lies and ridiculousness.
Alright I'm going to throw this wild conspiracy out there.
Bibi Netanyahu said he controlled President Trump.
What if he held the Samson Option over Trump?
For those of you who may not have heard of this, basically an atomic weapon would be detonated if the US decides to turn against and I hate to use the word Israel because this is not Israel anymore, they are Edom. Descendants of Esau.
but if the US decides to turn on Edom and in response they would ignite one or many more nuclear weapons.
US forces are on the ground in Iran.
Bases are closed in the US because of sleeper cells.
So what if the US "slips" Iran some of our firepower to use on Edom?
Each book of the Old Testament is a testament to how the leaders of the church degraded and became 'The Whore', were replaced, demonized in a crusade of sorts or an inquisition, and the cycle begins again.
The theory that apocalyptic religion is, in modern times, the underlying cause of this and most wars is sound. Theocracies are not democracies, so choose your poison.
In this way it is and will be 'Biblical'.