187
posted ago by penisse ago by penisse +187 / -0

๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿป https://x.com/michaelarothman/status/2036304147872678103

๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿป https://nitter.net/michaelarothman/status/2036304147872678103

(Copypasta follows)

๐—” ๐——๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง ๐—ช๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐— ๐—”๐——๐—˜ ๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—•๐—œ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ก๐—— ๐—”๐——๐—”๐—  ๐—ฆ๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—™๐—™ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก

A whistleblower has told FBI agents that Adam Schiff personally authorized and directed his team to leak classified intelligence to damage Donald Trump during the Russia investigation.

Let's be precise about what that means โ€” and why it matters that this was said to the FBI specifically.

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley laid it out clearly: the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee does not have declassification authority over this type of material. These documents are made available to Congress under tightly controlled rules. Schiff, Turley said, was viewed as one of the most political chairs of that committee in its history.

Now here's the critical legal point. This isn't an anonymous tip to a reporter. This is a statement made directly to FBI agents. Turley noted that whoever made this statement was fully aware that lying to federal agents is not just a crime โ€” ๐—ถ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐— ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐—ข๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—•๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป'๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐——๐—ข๐—. Making a false statement to the FBI puts you personally at risk. Which means, as Turley put it simply: someone is lying here, and someone is a felon.

If the allegation is true, what are we looking at? Each leaked document is a separate criminal violation. Count stacking โ€” the same method used against Trump associates during Russiagate โ€” could put Schiff at 10 years or more. And unlike the Mar-a-Lago case, where Trump was accused of negligence, this would be something far more damning: ๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜.

This is the man who stood in front of cameras for three years telling America he had seen evidence of Trump-Russia collusion with his own eyes. Evidence that never materialized. Evidence that Mueller never found.

Watch this space.