Uh this is HIS lawyers saying this. Of course theyre going to make this argument. Does it mean its true and if you know your client is guilty you probably know its false but are saying it and finding “experts” who will say it.
BEING UNABLE to match the bullet to the rifle is not the same thing as saying it definitely DOESN'T match the rilfe. Bullets can be so deformed and fragmented after impact, it renders impossible to confirm a match.
I imagine there are others here who, like me, feel they need to self-censor their comments quite a bit on this issue. There's a very uneven balance of power in play between the two sides. The following is my opinion.
When we are told with a tone that comes across that only a moron would question the "fact" that "Candace hated Charlie" that becomes a reference point for me. From there I think it's reasonable to conclude the saying "when you're a hammer everything's a nail" may be in play. By that I mean all the facts are being almost exclusively evaluated through the lens of who is MAGA and who isn't.
I'm sure you know what I'm getting at. Man, I hope I'm not made to pay for this comment. It goes well beyond my normal level of self-censoring.
The Deep State wants to divide the MAGA movement. Facts: "ATF did a tool mark analysis on the fragment. The results were INCONCLUSIVE, not "no match". The bullet shattered on impact and the jacket was too fragmented to compare, which explains the exit wound. The defense wants to use inconclusive as exculpatory evidence. But the prosecution wants to run chemical and molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy. That doesn't require an intact bullet. The defense is trying to stop that from happening. THATS THE REAL STORY".
This whole Charlie Kirk assassination thing stinks higher than the twin towers. It has since the start.
Yes. So many things don't add up, I wonder how they thought they'd get away with it. Other than, you know, they always HAVE in the past.
Are we surprised?
Nope
Distraction psyop.
That's what I thought and saw....
The video above says,
"Charlie Kirk is survived by his wife Erika Frantzve and their two children."
Her ultrasound video allegedly showing her pregnant had her name as Erika Frantzve and not Erika Kirk.
A lot of her social media and companies she claims to own have her listed as Frantzve not Kirk.
What's the deal with her?
Central Casting?
Uh this is HIS lawyers saying this. Of course theyre going to make this argument. Does it mean its true and if you know your client is guilty you probably know its false but are saying it and finding “experts” who will say it.
ATF confirmed - https://www.fox13now.com/news/shooting-of-charlie-kirk/tyler-robinson-wants-preliminary-hearing-delayed-claims-critical-evidence-not-turned-over
BEING UNABLE to match the bullet to the rifle is not the same thing as saying it definitely DOESN'T match the rilfe. Bullets can be so deformed and fragmented after impact, it renders impossible to confirm a match.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms report that said the agency was unable to identify the bullet recovered during Kirk's autopsy to the rifle Robinson is alleged to have used during the shooting. - https://www.fox13now.com/news/shooting-of-charlie-kirk/tyler-robinson-wants-preliminary-hearing-delayed-claims-critical-evidence-not-turned-over
Expect heavy gaslighting and ad hominems to try and get infront of yet another inconvenient fact.
I imagine there are others here who, like me, feel they need to self-censor their comments quite a bit on this issue. There's a very uneven balance of power in play between the two sides. The following is my opinion.
When we are told with a tone that comes across that only a moron would question the "fact" that "Candace hated Charlie" that becomes a reference point for me. From there I think it's reasonable to conclude the saying "when you're a hammer everything's a nail" may be in play. By that I mean all the facts are being almost exclusively evaluated through the lens of who is MAGA and who isn't.
I'm sure you know what I'm getting at. Man, I hope I'm not made to pay for this comment. It goes well beyond my normal level of self-censoring.
The Deep State wants to divide the MAGA movement. Facts: "ATF did a tool mark analysis on the fragment. The results were INCONCLUSIVE, not "no match". The bullet shattered on impact and the jacket was too fragmented to compare, which explains the exit wound. The defense wants to use inconclusive as exculpatory evidence. But the prosecution wants to run chemical and molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy. That doesn't require an intact bullet. The defense is trying to stop that from happening. THATS THE REAL STORY".
If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.
Yep the defense attorney team I'm probably pushed this article to dirty the jury pool..