"This is the best FB response I have seen so far on Trump’s “healer picture” post: “All of you know full well Trump doesn’t truly see himself as a savior nor healer. It’s quite shocking how easily that image rattled some of you and prompted a need to call him out of his ‘blasphemous ways.’
Few presidents in the history of mankind have done more for the advancement of the Judeo-Christian faith than President Donald Trump.
Appointed three Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, delivering a major pro-life victory.
Established the White House Faith Office in the West Wing to prioritize faith-based initiatives and religious liberty.
Created the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias to combat federal discrimination against Christians.
Launched the Religious Liberty Commission to protect and promote Christian expression nationwide.
Pardoned pro-life activists and Christians targeted for peaceful prayer and faith-based actions.
Moved the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, honoring biblical ties and evangelical priorities.
Issued protections for voluntary prayer and religious speech in public schools and federal workplaces.
Expanded conscience rights for Christian healthcare workers, chaplains, and adoption agencies.
Allowed churches to endorse candidates from the pulpit without losing tax-exempt status.
Affirmed America’s Judeo-Christian heritage through proclamations, faith events, and anti-Semitism efforts.
The list goes on.
Have you praised God for that? Or are we busy savoring for every opportunity to shout how ‘unlike Christ’ he is.
Imagine how much more orderly the world would be if we all scrutinized and corrected ourselves as harshly as we do the President.
Handshake account- pearl clutching. Explain Trump’s intention by posting the image. It shouldn’t be difficult, since it was quite BLATANT, according to you.
So the popes dressing like Jesus is wrong, Trump dressing (in pictures) like Jesus is wrong - but we only screech about Trump doing it. I believe that’s called hypocrisy.
EDIT: Just going to point out that only the popes are called “Holy Father” as a title.
Uhh...you do realize the Protestant Reformation happened 500 years ago, right? There were wars involved, colonies were formed....kinda how America started? Being Protestant is protesting the papacy, hence the name Protestant.
That is good. I also think Trump is showing he is not beholden to graven images (folks who saw that as Jesus are making an image have the reverence that is only due God), specific days of the year being off limits (he said praise Allah on Easter), or language limitations (he's so not "presidential", but he certainly is precedential!!!) Trump is eliminating man made limitations & expectations. He is also drawing all the attention to what he wants the attention drawn to. Is the light in his hand in the picture any relation to the light therapy he talked about during Covid? If he is mocking God or taking his name in vain, God will sort it out. God told us vengeance was his, and he will repay. God's Word also told us King David ate the bread of the presence that was reserved for the priests. God doesn't clutch pearls - his ways are not our ways. God also knows the hearts of all of us. I am looking to God to direct the rescue of this nation. It does not surprise me that he is using Donald Trump.
It's not Trump that views himself as such. It's some of his followers. Yes, we understand that. Doesn't matter. He doesn't refute the stuff, though. And in this case, he passed it along. So, he's at least slightly complicit in propagating the blasphemous messaging that he's some sort of God-like person. A sort of God-king, as some have put forward.
This isn't me "clutching pearls." This is me calling out a simple, easily avoidable act. We told in the Bible to call out these things when we see or hear them. So, I do. I'm also not brazen enough to claim I know God well enough to be able to say I "know" His Plan or that I "know" when He chooses to use someone to advance it. That is up to those he uses, as well as future generations to determine through the lenses of history and hindsight.
That isn't me doubting His Plan, either. That's me saying that while I am a believer in Christ, I also am not brazen enough to claim I am some sort of prophet or seer. God or Jesus will tell me what I need to know, when I need to know it. And as of right now, my verdict is out on Trump. God or Jesus "could" be using the man to some degree, but He's also used His enemies to some degree, even those enemies people thought were His followers.
While Trump is in office only his actions THROUGHOUT his term will determine who or what he ultimately is. I reserve my judgement on that for AFTER. The Enemy works in just as mysterious ways, at times, as God does. So it makes it especially hard for us mere mortal humans to figure out. This is one of God's tests for us. So it's a test I take with a certain amount of caution.
Which means I don't fully trust any human. Ever. Even after they've done as much as they can to prove themselves to me to be trustworthy. I've seen things from people I'd never thought possible until I saw them play out. People so cunning and conniving that they put themselves through "the grinder" just to make others believe they were good, when in fact, they exposed themselves later to be just another in a long line of betrayers, liars, and deceivers. They wait until you e let your guard down to strike. It's what serpents do. So I keep myself ready...by being skeptical. It isn't doubting God. It's knowing that enemies lurk everywhere and pose as anyone to further [their] agendas.
The only way to deal with that is to watch, remain skeptical, and to trust in God and Christ. But I'm not going to sit back and applaud someone for some of the things they do or say, especially when it comes to something like portraying a human as some sort of god-king.
Serious question: Do pictures of “saints” that have been immortalized by the Catholic Church bother you? I’ve seen many that have been painted that have the “holy” light behind the head of the saint and they’re shown in various scenes in which they’re known for being of service, example St Francis is shown tending to animals and nature.
Another serious question: Do you need a mediator between you and God? Do you believe the pope is the earthly representative of God? Because I find the idea of the pope to be quite blasphemous, that only through the mediation of a representative of the Catholic Church can you be absolved of sin, when Christ literally gave His life for our sins. The Catholic Church is attempting to gatekeep how Christians interact with God, and it’s not biblical in any way.
Edit: Had to ask this one. Do you think Jesus would approve of the Vatican’s bank accounts? Or would He see them in the same light as the money changers in the temple?
Yep, so what’s the purpose of the pope? Also, don’t you think the pope’s title of “Holy Father” is just a tiny bit blasphemous? I don’t recall seeing that title in the Bible for any church father.
The pope was established for control, not the shepherding of the people, the heinous history of extremist views that produced the Inquisition and such horrors designate the church as the realm of the adversary.
They can’t have us liking a Pro-God President, now can they???? I feel they are trying to make Trump out like the Anti-Christ so the truly evil can remain in control.
Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.
But to say America was founded with judeo values is a stretch and not true --when it was Christian values.
The term "Judeo-Christian" is a 20th-century construct. It gained traction in the 1930s–1950s, initially among liberals to combat anti-Semitism and fascism by emphasizing shared roots of Judaism and Christianity, then during the Cold War to unify against "godless communism." It was not used by the founders or in founding-era documents. Judaism had minimal direct influence on 18th-century American political thought—Jews were a tiny minority, and Old Testament ideas were filtered almost entirely through Christian (especially Protestant) interpretation.
Claiming "Judeo-Christian" retroactively includes Judaism in a way that doesn't match the historical record, where the dominant cultural force was Christianity (Protestant varieties). It often serves modern rhetorical purposes (e.g., inclusivity or cultural conservatism) rather than precise history.
But yes just go ahead and keep parroting the line.
“Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.”
Yeah, you missed the mark - those 5 books that you so carelessly acknowledged form the basis of Christianity. The creation is explained, the Creator illuminated, the introduction of evil, the fall of mankind, the Seed War proclaimed, the Redeemer foretold, the war exposed, the playing field leveled, and the main players named…And that’s just Genesis.
And you forgot about the chronicles of the kings and the writings of the prophets. You’re not a serious person if you can’t recognize facts.
You might want to read your Bible again, it’s very specific. Maybe you missed this part:
[Rev 7:4-8 KJV] 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: [and there were] sealed an hundred [and] forty [and] four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad [were] sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses [were] sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar [were] sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin [were] sealed twelve thousand.
Right back at ya dude. I know your late to this party so here you go:
Here's a catholic exorcism priest talking about it.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVjBP6miaKi/ (Fr. Ripperger: “The big mistake that people make is still thinking the Jews are the chosen people—they were, but they rejected their inheritance. They refused to accept Christ.”)
The "former" shift in Christian theology:
Christians believe Jesus Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant and established a New Covenant (see Jeremiah 31:31-34, quoted in Hebrews 8 in the New Testament). In this view:Many first-century Jews accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but the religious leadership largely rejected Him, leading to His crucifixion.
The New Testament teaches that the covenant blessings now extend to all who believe in Christ—Jews and Gentiles alike—forming the Church as the "new Israel" or "spiritual Israel" (e.g., Romans 9-11 discusses this transition; Galatians 3:28-29 says believers in Christ are Abraham's true heirs; 1 Peter 2:9 applies the "chosen people" language to the Church).
Traditional Catholic teaching (and views expressed by some exorcists/theologians) holds that by rejecting Christ, the Jewish people as a collective apostatized from their role as the elect. Their unique status as the sole "chosen" transferred to the Church. Jerusalem's destruction in 70 AD is sometimes cited as a historical sign of this shift (fulfilling prophecies like those in Matthew 23-24).
Fr. Chad Ripperger (the priest in the video) summarizes it this way in the clip: the Jews were the chosen people, but by rejecting Christ they "lost their status as the elect, which was then transferred to Christians who believe in Him." This reflects a classic supersessionist or fulfillment theology common in Catholicism: the Church doesn't replace Israel out of spite but completes what the Old Covenant pointed toward.
In short, the "former" label comes from the Christian belief that the Messiah's arrival changed the covenant's structure—it's no longer limited to one ethnic group but open to a universal Church. This is a theological interpretation, not a historical or empirical claim, and it has been debated for centuries.
Hope this helps you from not parroting Ben Shapiro and daily wire lines.
That’s a lot of verbiage and no where did you address the actual scripture that I so generously copied/pasted for you. I guess you’re unfamiliar with the Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ.
For some, the thought, once entering the brain, of Trump potentially being the Messiah, is enough for a uncontrollable siezure. That is next level TDS, especially for the fake, nefarious creators of the "Beast System". Mens hearts will fail and in this case Brain annurisms and bleading out of one eye.
Trump trolls traitors.
They expose themselves.
"This is the best FB response I have seen so far on Trump’s “healer picture” post: “All of you know full well Trump doesn’t truly see himself as a savior nor healer. It’s quite shocking how easily that image rattled some of you and prompted a need to call him out of his ‘blasphemous ways.’
Few presidents in the history of mankind have done more for the advancement of the Judeo-Christian faith than President Donald Trump.
Appointed three Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, delivering a major pro-life victory.
Established the White House Faith Office in the West Wing to prioritize faith-based initiatives and religious liberty.
Created the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias to combat federal discrimination against Christians.
Launched the Religious Liberty Commission to protect and promote Christian expression nationwide.
Pardoned pro-life activists and Christians targeted for peaceful prayer and faith-based actions.
Moved the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, honoring biblical ties and evangelical priorities.
Issued protections for voluntary prayer and religious speech in public schools and federal workplaces.
Expanded conscience rights for Christian healthcare workers, chaplains, and adoption agencies.
Allowed churches to endorse candidates from the pulpit without losing tax-exempt status.
Affirmed America’s Judeo-Christian heritage through proclamations, faith events, and anti-Semitism efforts.
The list goes on.
Have you praised God for that? Or are we busy savoring for every opportunity to shout how ‘unlike Christ’ he is.
Imagine how much more orderly the world would be if we all scrutinized and corrected ourselves as harshly as we do the President.
God have mercy on us."
Grace for America.”
https://nitter.net/i/status/2043819029400318340
Handshake account- pearl clutching. Explain Trump’s intention by posting the image. It shouldn’t be difficult, since it was quite BLATANT, according to you.
Do you realize that the pope (every single one) dresses exactly the same way that Trump was dressed in the picture?
Two things can be wrong, doesn't make one of them right.
So the popes dressing like Jesus is wrong, Trump dressing (in pictures) like Jesus is wrong - but we only screech about Trump doing it. I believe that’s called hypocrisy.
EDIT: Just going to point out that only the popes are called “Holy Father” as a title.
Uhh...you do realize the Protestant Reformation happened 500 years ago, right? There were wars involved, colonies were formed....kinda how America started? Being Protestant is protesting the papacy, hence the name Protestant.
Wait, the pope is the anti-christ?
AlwaysHasBeen.png
Yeah, I do know that. Do you even know the history of the popes in the Catholic Church - how they killed Christians who refused to bow to the pope?
I liked this one…
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2043705694663172508?s=20
That is good. I also think Trump is showing he is not beholden to graven images (folks who saw that as Jesus are making an image have the reverence that is only due God), specific days of the year being off limits (he said praise Allah on Easter), or language limitations (he's so not "presidential", but he certainly is precedential!!!) Trump is eliminating man made limitations & expectations. He is also drawing all the attention to what he wants the attention drawn to. Is the light in his hand in the picture any relation to the light therapy he talked about during Covid? If he is mocking God or taking his name in vain, God will sort it out. God told us vengeance was his, and he will repay. God's Word also told us King David ate the bread of the presence that was reserved for the priests. God doesn't clutch pearls - his ways are not our ways. God also knows the hearts of all of us. I am looking to God to direct the rescue of this nation. It does not surprise me that he is using Donald Trump.
It's not Trump that views himself as such. It's some of his followers. Yes, we understand that. Doesn't matter. He doesn't refute the stuff, though. And in this case, he passed it along. So, he's at least slightly complicit in propagating the blasphemous messaging that he's some sort of God-like person. A sort of God-king, as some have put forward.
This isn't me "clutching pearls." This is me calling out a simple, easily avoidable act. We told in the Bible to call out these things when we see or hear them. So, I do. I'm also not brazen enough to claim I know God well enough to be able to say I "know" His Plan or that I "know" when He chooses to use someone to advance it. That is up to those he uses, as well as future generations to determine through the lenses of history and hindsight.
That isn't me doubting His Plan, either. That's me saying that while I am a believer in Christ, I also am not brazen enough to claim I am some sort of prophet or seer. God or Jesus will tell me what I need to know, when I need to know it. And as of right now, my verdict is out on Trump. God or Jesus "could" be using the man to some degree, but He's also used His enemies to some degree, even those enemies people thought were His followers.
While Trump is in office only his actions THROUGHOUT his term will determine who or what he ultimately is. I reserve my judgement on that for AFTER. The Enemy works in just as mysterious ways, at times, as God does. So it makes it especially hard for us mere mortal humans to figure out. This is one of God's tests for us. So it's a test I take with a certain amount of caution.
Which means I don't fully trust any human. Ever. Even after they've done as much as they can to prove themselves to me to be trustworthy. I've seen things from people I'd never thought possible until I saw them play out. People so cunning and conniving that they put themselves through "the grinder" just to make others believe they were good, when in fact, they exposed themselves later to be just another in a long line of betrayers, liars, and deceivers. They wait until you e let your guard down to strike. It's what serpents do. So I keep myself ready...by being skeptical. It isn't doubting God. It's knowing that enemies lurk everywhere and pose as anyone to further [their] agendas.
The only way to deal with that is to watch, remain skeptical, and to trust in God and Christ. But I'm not going to sit back and applaud someone for some of the things they do or say, especially when it comes to something like portraying a human as some sort of god-king.
Serious question: Do pictures of “saints” that have been immortalized by the Catholic Church bother you? I’ve seen many that have been painted that have the “holy” light behind the head of the saint and they’re shown in various scenes in which they’re known for being of service, example St Francis is shown tending to animals and nature.
Another serious question: Do you need a mediator between you and God? Do you believe the pope is the earthly representative of God? Because I find the idea of the pope to be quite blasphemous, that only through the mediation of a representative of the Catholic Church can you be absolved of sin, when Christ literally gave His life for our sins. The Catholic Church is attempting to gatekeep how Christians interact with God, and it’s not biblical in any way.
Edit: Had to ask this one. Do you think Jesus would approve of the Vatican’s bank accounts? Or would He see them in the same light as the money changers in the temple?
Jesus the Christ IS the intercessor for us to the Heavenly Father-"no one can go to the Father except through Me."
Yep, so what’s the purpose of the pope? Also, don’t you think the pope’s title of “Holy Father” is just a tiny bit blasphemous? I don’t recall seeing that title in the Bible for any church father.
The pope was established for control, not the shepherding of the people, the heinous history of extremist views that produced the Inquisition and such horrors designate the church as the realm of the adversary.
Ah, you and I agree about that 100%.
the pope is the anti-christ, the "man of sin" as Paul put it...
Discerning is a wonderful thing. You have a firm grasp on that. Test the spirits.
They can’t have us liking a Pro-God President, now can they???? I feel they are trying to make Trump out like the Anti-Christ so the truly evil can remain in control.
So White Christians start America. No founding father was Jewish nor practiced judasim so I guess they're just inserting themselves again...
Christianity has its roots in Judaism. You don’t have to like it, but it is factual.
Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.
But to say America was founded with judeo values is a stretch and not true --when it was Christian values.
The term "Judeo-Christian" is a 20th-century construct. It gained traction in the 1930s–1950s, initially among liberals to combat anti-Semitism and fascism by emphasizing shared roots of Judaism and Christianity, then during the Cold War to unify against "godless communism." It was not used by the founders or in founding-era documents. Judaism had minimal direct influence on 18th-century American political thought—Jews were a tiny minority, and Old Testament ideas were filtered almost entirely through Christian (especially Protestant) interpretation.
Claiming "Judeo-Christian" retroactively includes Judaism in a way that doesn't match the historical record, where the dominant cultural force was Christianity (Protestant varieties). It often serves modern rhetorical purposes (e.g., inclusivity or cultural conservatism) rather than precise history.
But yes just go ahead and keep parroting the line.
“Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.”
Yeah, you missed the mark - those 5 books that you so carelessly acknowledged form the basis of Christianity. The creation is explained, the Creator illuminated, the introduction of evil, the fall of mankind, the Seed War proclaimed, the Redeemer foretold, the war exposed, the playing field leveled, and the main players named…And that’s just Genesis.
And you forgot about the chronicles of the kings and the writings of the prophets. You’re not a serious person if you can’t recognize facts.
Says the guy using a coined term from the early 1900s lol.
I need you to reread my comments slower. Doesn't sound like you absorb things well.
Plus somehow you've already lost the plot that America was not founded on judeo values. But sip that copium harder.
Since we want to talk facts more don't forget Jews = God's former chosen people.
You might want to read your Bible again, it’s very specific. Maybe you missed this part: [Rev 7:4-8 KJV] 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: [and there were] sealed an hundred [and] forty [and] four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad [were] sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses [were] sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar [were] sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin [were] sealed twelve thousand.
Right back at ya dude. I know your late to this party so here you go:
Here's a catholic exorcism priest talking about it.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVjBP6miaKi/ (Fr. Ripperger: “The big mistake that people make is still thinking the Jews are the chosen people—they were, but they rejected their inheritance. They refused to accept Christ.”)
The "former" shift in Christian theology:
Christians believe Jesus Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant and established a New Covenant (see Jeremiah 31:31-34, quoted in Hebrews 8 in the New Testament). In this view:Many first-century Jews accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but the religious leadership largely rejected Him, leading to His crucifixion.
The New Testament teaches that the covenant blessings now extend to all who believe in Christ—Jews and Gentiles alike—forming the Church as the "new Israel" or "spiritual Israel" (e.g., Romans 9-11 discusses this transition; Galatians 3:28-29 says believers in Christ are Abraham's true heirs; 1 Peter 2:9 applies the "chosen people" language to the Church).
Traditional Catholic teaching (and views expressed by some exorcists/theologians) holds that by rejecting Christ, the Jewish people as a collective apostatized from their role as the elect. Their unique status as the sole "chosen" transferred to the Church. Jerusalem's destruction in 70 AD is sometimes cited as a historical sign of this shift (fulfilling prophecies like those in Matthew 23-24).
Fr. Chad Ripperger (the priest in the video) summarizes it this way in the clip: the Jews were the chosen people, but by rejecting Christ they "lost their status as the elect, which was then transferred to Christians who believe in Him." This reflects a classic supersessionist or fulfillment theology common in Catholicism: the Church doesn't replace Israel out of spite but completes what the Old Covenant pointed toward.
In short, the "former" label comes from the Christian belief that the Messiah's arrival changed the covenant's structure—it's no longer limited to one ethnic group but open to a universal Church. This is a theological interpretation, not a historical or empirical claim, and it has been debated for centuries.
Hope this helps you from not parroting Ben Shapiro and daily wire lines.
That’s a lot of verbiage and no where did you address the actual scripture that I so generously copied/pasted for you. I guess you’re unfamiliar with the Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ.
You quoting a catholic is unimpressive.
So what you’re saying is that God made a mistake about choosing the Jews because He wasn’t omniscient. Um, yeah, that’s kinda stupid.
For some, the thought, once entering the brain, of Trump potentially being the Messiah, is enough for a uncontrollable siezure. That is next level TDS, especially for the fake, nefarious creators of the "Beast System". Mens hearts will fail and in this case Brain annurisms and bleading out of one eye.