Trump bombed these targets so they're not a threat to forces and personnel on the ground. This was meant to safeguard the transfer of the uranium and Iranian Intel on Israeli blackmail ops like the Epstien files.
The United States and Israel are pursuing unprecedented military integration, moving beyond traditional supply-chain dependency into deep operational and technological fusion.
Taking out boats laying mines in Hormuz and shooting down drones (and their launch sites) attacking oil tankers should be considered "Offensive Strikes" and not retaliatory?
Nope. When dealing with aggressors, taking out their offensive capability, it can indeed be called defensive strikes.
In the USA, there is a thing called Stand Your Ground in most states, which is different to the Duty to Retreat that many nations, and sadly some blue states, enforce. There is also a thing calle Acting in Defense, which can be of oneself or others. Those tennets hold for multiple spectrums of American culture and law.
It is totally permissible to use force (up to and including deadly) in defense of yourself and others if you feel threatened. The amount of force used should be somewhat proportional to the threat. Often more force, especially if needed to end the threat, is needed, understood, and acceptable to the law.
Expounding on examples:
If someone slapped you, shooting them is excessive force. However, If you genuinely feel your life (or others) is threatened, for example they have a visible weapon, they say they are going to kill you and then advance to perform said action, especially if you are a twig and they are a ripped 250lbs. dude, then yes, taking their life is acceptable in defense.
In wartime, it is much easier. If you are protecting something or someone, and someone else attacks, yes you can defensively neutralize the offense. War is so much deadlier, killing the offensive /aggressive force, is almost always the acceptable countermeasure/defense.
There is no state where you can legally go to a persons house and kill them because they were planning on and preparing to kill you. That is a military thing.
Wag The Iran , again. IMO, this situation was resolved some time ago. BUT the WHats need NARRATIVE to explain the DESTRUCTION of the Federal Reserve Banking System (Cabal) or the "City of London" and its Geopolitical tentacles.
Interesting that 4h ago, BTC hit 73033 ...just that hour 1000 dollars down , it then dropped another 300 points and started to recuperate.
I kid you not. You want to know how the peace negotiation is going? Check the BTC price. The correlation is uncanny.
My view? 95440 is a level to break to consider it somewhat neutralized. Breaking 78078 we might indeed see better prospects at a improvement of relations.
Breaking 82798 and holding, I would consider that a potential to a peace treaty and slow normalization of relations. Even, membership to the board of piece.
More like what’s left of the Deep State trying to stop the transfer of evidence being the uranium and Epstein files.
Iran has servers containing intel on Israel.
Are you saying Trump did not bomb Iran again?
This is white hats taking out blackhats.
Trump bombed these targets so they're not a threat to forces and personnel on the ground. This was meant to safeguard the transfer of the uranium and Iranian Intel on Israeli blackmail ops like the Epstien files.
The bombings protect evidence.
Omay. I thought you were saying the deep state was doing the bombing in question.
The bombing being done by the deep state is done by Israel. Israel has been funding Islamic terrorrist groups to maintain US Funding.
Trump is removing deep state assets, but also manipulating the deep state to destroy itself which delays the Great Awakening.
By destroying all of the deep state proxies, the only deep state country left will be Israel.
The United States and Israel are pursuing unprecedented military integration, moving beyond traditional supply-chain dependency into deep operational and technological fusion.
That is the master stroke.
Which makes it easier to expose them. It forces Israel to show every card they have.
Pretty sure it's in The Art of War
Beatings will continue until morale improves.
Oh well, this also is gonna take awhile, frens.
Can El Salvador help with other countries' truth dosage increase?
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2059794219640775042/video/1?s=46
The US military has conducted MORE defensive strikes on southern Iran, targeting sites believed to pose a threat to U.S. forces…
Multiple Iranian drones have also been shot down Keep praying for our troops🙏🙏
🙏
u/#prayer
AMEN
LOL... "Defensive Strikes". Thats a new one for me. Kind of falls into the "mostly peaceful protests" as the fire rages in the background.
u/#ummwhat
Taking out boats laying mines in Hormuz and shooting down drones (and their launch sites) attacking oil tankers should be considered "Offensive Strikes" and not retaliatory?
Nope. When dealing with aggressors, taking out their offensive capability, it can indeed be called defensive strikes.
In the USA, there is a thing called Stand Your Ground in most states, which is different to the Duty to Retreat that many nations, and sadly some blue states, enforce. There is also a thing calle Acting in Defense, which can be of oneself or others. Those tennets hold for multiple spectrums of American culture and law.
It is totally permissible to use force (up to and including deadly) in defense of yourself and others if you feel threatened. The amount of force used should be somewhat proportional to the threat. Often more force, especially if needed to end the threat, is needed, understood, and acceptable to the law.
Expounding on examples:
If someone slapped you, shooting them is excessive force. However, If you genuinely feel your life (or others) is threatened, for example they have a visible weapon, they say they are going to kill you and then advance to perform said action, especially if you are a twig and they are a ripped 250lbs. dude, then yes, taking their life is acceptable in defense.
In wartime, it is much easier. If you are protecting something or someone, and someone else attacks, yes you can defensively neutralize the offense. War is so much deadlier, killing the offensive /aggressive force, is almost always the acceptable countermeasure/defense.
I think maybe you meant to reply to the other, because I agree with you.
There is no state where you can legally go to a persons house and kill them because they were planning on and preparing to kill you. That is a military thing.
Really???? So we should just do nothing when we're attacked...DURING A CEASEFIRE?
Launching drones into the strait is definitely not "defensive." I suppose we should just let them drone strike as they please?
The bombings will continue until Freedom improves...
u/#Draw
Wag The Iran , again. IMO, this situation was resolved some time ago. BUT the WHats need NARRATIVE to explain the DESTRUCTION of the Federal Reserve Banking System (Cabal) or the "City of London" and its Geopolitical tentacles.
Good.
I remember when Rush played this, or another version of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsLh2LPRPAA&list=RDPsLh2LPRPAA&start_radio=1
We love war when it's our guy.
Interesting that 4h ago, BTC hit 73033 ...just that hour 1000 dollars down , it then dropped another 300 points and started to recuperate.
I kid you not. You want to know how the peace negotiation is going? Check the BTC price. The correlation is uncanny.
My view? 95440 is a level to break to consider it somewhat neutralized. Breaking 78078 we might indeed see better prospects at a improvement of relations.
Breaking 82798 and holding, I would consider that a potential to a peace treaty and slow normalization of relations. Even, membership to the board of piece.
Oh that is good news