"In a powerful Truth Social post, President Trump exposes the total fraud: When the star witness completely recants and reveals he was strong armed by Radical Left prosecutors Tish James and Alvin Bragg... and the DA even admits Cohen was their ONLY reason for bringing the case... how is this not dismissed immediately?!
This was never about justice, it was a coordinated political persecution by corrupt New York Democrats desperate to stop Trump at any cost."
When a Star Witness totally recants, and in every way reveals that he was pressured and coerced to give testimony, and when the Prosecutor admits that this Witness was the single reason that the case was brought, there was no other, how can that Case not be immediately dismissed? That is exactly what happened in the Democrat New York Attorney General and Manhattan District Attorney’s Hoaxes against me. Michael Cohen has come out and unequivocally stated that the Radical Left Prosecutors, Tish James and Alvin Bragg, pressured and coerced him to testify against your favorite President, ME, when they made him the key player in their Political Witch Hunts. Now that his testimony is wiped away, and the unAmerican, Political Charade “Cases” are even further discredited, they should be put out of their misery, and dismissed, once and for all. Our Constitution, and the Rule of Law, demand immediate and swift dismissal, as well as for the Perpetrators of the Radical Left Lawfare and Weaponization to be held criminally responsible for their terrible misdeeds. We have to restore Confidence and Honor in our Justice System. I am an innocent man who has been horribly treated. Hopefully the Courts will do what everyone knows should be done. Thank you! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Our Constitution, and the Rule of Law, demand immediate and swift dismissal, as well as for the Perpetrators of the Radical Left Lawfare and Weaponization to be held criminally responsible for their terrible misdeeds.
But he didn't recant. He basically said he was pressured to testify. Not that he lied about anything in his testimony. There's a big difference between the two.
Someone can be pressured to give testimony. It doesn't mean the testimony itself is not factual.
I haven't seen anywhere where Cohen has said he lied or comitted perjury with that testimony. If anyone else has, please share.
What Cohen actually said (from his January 17, 2026 Substack post)Key excerpts:“From the time I first began meeting with lawyers... I felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government’s desire to build the cases against and secure a judgment and convictions against President Trump.”
“During my time with prosecutors... it was clear they were interested only in testimony from me that would enable them to convict President Trump. When my testimony was insufficient... prosecutors frequently asked inappropriate leading questions...”
“Again, I felt compelled and coerced to deliver what they were seeking.”
He notes the political motivations of Letitia James and Alvin Bragg but explicitly says: “I am not writing this to defend Donald Trump...”
He criticizes the process (how prosecutors shaped and directed his input) and his own feelings under pressure, while still framing his past actions as tied to Trump's conduct. He does not say “I lied under oath,” “Trump didn’t direct the payments,” or “My trial testimony about the facts was false.”
Claim of coercion/pressure attacks the reliability or voluntariness of the testimony. It suggests the witness was steered or leaned on, which can support arguments for a new trial, dismissal on appeal, or reduced weight to the evidence. But without saying the underlying facts were invented, it doesn't erase corroborating evidence (e.g., checks, ledgers, other witnesses, recordings in the hush-money case).
Cohen's statement gives Trump's team strong rhetorical and appellate ammunition to call the cases tainted "lawfare." Trump has described it as a full recant and "SET UP," demanding immediate dismissal.
That's because it wasn't a reversal. Even with the prosecution obviously steered the testimony to go where they wanted it to (that's how all prosecution efforts go), he never said he lied about anything.
Remember as well that there was evidence supporting his testimony. It wasn't just taking him at his word.
I'm not saying it's ok to steer investigations straight into the path that leads down the direction they want. It's not. Ideally, it should be unbiased.
But being coerced and the prosecution leading him down the path they want to go down isn't the same as him lying during testimony and it 100% is NOT the same as him recanting.
Recanting is a very specific thing. It's not just admitting to being pressured or saying the prosecution was biased. It's saying that what they previously said was a lie. They're not all interchangeable terms.
As far as I'm aware, Cohen has never recanted any of his testimony.
"In a powerful Truth Social post, President Trump exposes the total fraud: When the star witness completely recants and reveals he was strong armed by Radical Left prosecutors Tish James and Alvin Bragg... and the DA even admits Cohen was their ONLY reason for bringing the case... how is this not dismissed immediately?!
This was never about justice, it was a coordinated political persecution by corrupt New York Democrats desperate to stop Trump at any cost."
https://nitter.net/i/status/2061749144826286536
sucks for them when all their shit falls apart........
No it doesn't. They deserve it. We need to gloat & rub it in their faces like they do to us.
Time to stop being nice.
absolutely........
I can hardly wait for the boomerang.
Any referrals to the DOJ, yet? Maybe the new DNI will do that quickly.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Yeah, it must be one heck of a toss cause it ain;t come back yet! Kek
hahaha
Trump 45~47 is the most hunted President in American history. Now the hunted becomes the hunter.
🔥Trump's TS post -
When a Star Witness totally recants, and in every way reveals that he was pressured and coerced to give testimony, and when the Prosecutor admits that this Witness was the single reason that the case was brought, there was no other, how can that Case not be immediately dismissed? That is exactly what happened in the Democrat New York Attorney General and Manhattan District Attorney’s Hoaxes against me. Michael Cohen has come out and unequivocally stated that the Radical Left Prosecutors, Tish James and Alvin Bragg, pressured and coerced him to testify against your favorite President, ME, when they made him the key player in their Political Witch Hunts. Now that his testimony is wiped away, and the unAmerican, Political Charade “Cases” are even further discredited, they should be put out of their misery, and dismissed, once and for all. Our Constitution, and the Rule of Law, demand immediate and swift dismissal, as well as for the Perpetrators of the Radical Left Lawfare and Weaponization to be held criminally responsible for their terrible misdeeds. We have to restore Confidence and Honor in our Justice System. I am an innocent man who has been horribly treated. Hopefully the Courts will do what everyone knows should be done. Thank you! President DONALD J. TRUMP
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116678544710349966
Our Constitution, and the Rule of Law, demand immediate and swift dismissal, as well as for the Perpetrators of the Radical Left Lawfare and Weaponization to be held criminally responsible for their terrible misdeeds.
In Bold is what we all want to see.
Geez, almost like he was a plant.
Put those attorneys in prison for life. Thats a shit profession. Dismantle the BARR.
Can Hoffman be arrested yet?
But he didn't recant. He basically said he was pressured to testify. Not that he lied about anything in his testimony. There's a big difference between the two.
Someone can be pressured to give testimony. It doesn't mean the testimony itself is not factual.
I haven't seen anywhere where Cohen has said he lied or comitted perjury with that testimony. If anyone else has, please share.
What Cohen actually said (from his January 17, 2026 Substack post)Key excerpts:“From the time I first began meeting with lawyers... I felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government’s desire to build the cases against and secure a judgment and convictions against President Trump.” “During my time with prosecutors... it was clear they were interested only in testimony from me that would enable them to convict President Trump. When my testimony was insufficient... prosecutors frequently asked inappropriate leading questions...” “Again, I felt compelled and coerced to deliver what they were seeking.” He notes the political motivations of Letitia James and Alvin Bragg but explicitly says: “I am not writing this to defend Donald Trump...”
https://therealmichaelcohen.substack.com/p/when-politics-blind-justice
He criticizes the process (how prosecutors shaped and directed his input) and his own feelings under pressure, while still framing his past actions as tied to Trump's conduct. He does not say “I lied under oath,” “Trump didn’t direct the payments,” or “My trial testimony about the facts was false.”
Claim of coercion/pressure attacks the reliability or voluntariness of the testimony. It suggests the witness was steered or leaned on, which can support arguments for a new trial, dismissal on appeal, or reduced weight to the evidence. But without saying the underlying facts were invented, it doesn't erase corroborating evidence (e.g., checks, ledgers, other witnesses, recordings in the hush-money case).
Cohen's statement gives Trump's team strong rhetorical and appellate ammunition to call the cases tainted "lawfare." Trump has described it as a full recant and "SET UP," demanding immediate dismissal.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5905215-donald-trump-new-york-legal-cases/
However, as of June 2026, courts haven't treated it as a complete reversal—the convictions/judgments stand pending ongoing appeals.
Good background, thanks. Like the J6 scam “trials”. Lies by omission.
That's because it wasn't a reversal. Even with the prosecution obviously steered the testimony to go where they wanted it to (that's how all prosecution efforts go), he never said he lied about anything.
Remember as well that there was evidence supporting his testimony. It wasn't just taking him at his word.
I'm not saying it's ok to steer investigations straight into the path that leads down the direction they want. It's not. Ideally, it should be unbiased.
But being coerced and the prosecution leading him down the path they want to go down isn't the same as him lying during testimony and it 100% is NOT the same as him recanting.
Recanting is a very specific thing. It's not just admitting to being pressured or saying the prosecution was biased. It's saying that what they previously said was a lie. They're not all interchangeable terms.
As far as I'm aware, Cohen has never recanted any of his testimony.
They are in deep deep trouble