Banning things only creates/fuels the forbidden fruit syndrome.
Now do murder
Also, It's not about that. It's about US, we the people, having to look at these weirdos. It's also about mental illness. Because that's what face tattooes are: mental illness externalized. America is not an ancient tribe in africa or south america. We don't blow psychedelic snuff and tobacco powder up each others nostrils using long pipes. If you want that, then LEAVE
We have a culture, and face tattooes are a total disintegration of our culture, our ideas, our civilization, so if you want that, then please go to a society that has those things. And get killed by a giant snake 5 minutes later.
We don't want to see it. It looks like mental illness. It says run away. It's intimidating and scary because face tattooes are the shibboleth of criminals, pirates and murderers. We need it to stop, by banning tattoo parlors from tattoing the neck and face. The people are welcome to give themselves illegal tattooes but keep in mind, when they do, the employer will ask, why should I hire a criminal?
Military vets with tats will happily tell you to shove it up your ass lol.
True , Best to allow the dangerous ones to identify themselves.
"The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." --Thucydides 460 B.C. – 395 B.C.
The mental illness has been the hypnotized Citizens allowing their system to be corrupted by EVIL
The problem is that Government has made killing a murderer illegal. Fix that along with concealed carry laws and in short order murder will almost disappear as a street crime. Husbands ,wives & business partners much less affected.
Face tattoos are just a notice to lock & load upon sighting.
I hate tats and I've seen my fair share of shit tattoos I will say and I can't believe I'm saying this but I do agree this is a first amendment violation. You're free to do what you want when it comes to bad decisions and you can can reap the rewards of that.
Agreed, I can't stand those stupid nose rings that show men you're an un-datable low IQ whiny liberal woman but I'm not about to let the government enforce the removal of them.
Pants around your knees, tattoos on your face, nose ring collecting boogers, "nah wut I'm sayn" after every sentence spoken, died purple hair with shaved sides, ridiculously spelled dindu names like Shawniqua, poor hygiene, black lives matter flags... these are all wonderful things if you think about it. They automatically tell us who to not hire, talk to, date or when to mark up prices.
"So again, are face and neck tattoos — particularly excessive ones — abhorrent?"
Some like this one are not only abhorrent but actively, aggressively threatening.
Intimidating others, on purpose.
Free speech / art means I don't have to see it or buy it or go to that gallery.
This is too much in other people's faces.
P.S. more thoughts
Sound expression is more akin to "free speech" than visual "art" yet there are noise standards to prevent neighbors from being exposed to ear-blasting "music" and pedestrians from "ear blasting" from cars which make the cars vibrate. Imagine what it does to your ear drums and nervous system! Sound waves not only hit your ear drums, but all of the body's nervous system; think bass.
Is "gore porn" protected "speech" on city streets?? 8kun used to be attacked by post after post of gore porn; one could not hide the post after post after post without seeing them first! So I had to leave the site, as intended by the spammers. No matter if they were taken off later, one cannot "unsee".
Similarly, one cannot "unsee" tats obviously intended to intimidate, nor erase the logical response of the nervous system experiencing threat!
Especially frightening for children. My kid was so scared by some Halloween costumes she was literally shaking, even though I took her out early to avoid teens in horrible masks.
There are community standards, and "breaching the peace" was a very valid counterpoint to sounds and images intending indeed to disturb the peace.
Besides, face and neck tattoos cause brain damage from inks leaking into the body. /s and also /not s.
Plus the law does not arrest anyone expressing body "art"! It is regulating the tattoo business in its state.
There is a big difference between buying an art magazine with disgusting art in it
Or going to a gallery with disgusting art in it (crucifix in jar of urine)
VERSUS
Walking to a public transporation place and seeing DISGUSTING art on the walls
Or walking past people at the public transportation place and having no choice but to see disgusting ART on their faces
Art has a venue
When your face is the venue, the art becomes imposing advertisement and propaganda, no matter what it is, it's political. One cannot escape it, or choose not to see it
So the "but its my art, and my freedom of speech" doesn't hold up ANY MORE than NOT wearing clothes and saying MY NAKED BODY IS MY ART, even tho we have laws against public nudity, indecency and contributing to delinquency of a minor
That's a weird law. You're for this? Just because you don't like something doesn't mean that the government needs to make it illegal. I think employers should be able to refuse these people jobs and that's good enough.
How about we start by banning cutting of the junk of little boys and titties of our young girls. That’s where I want to start.
I'd like to add banning protestors wearing back-packs, and those wannabe journalists who use their cell phones and have "press" taped onto their clothing who think they can go wherever the fuck they want while filming at their protests...
I don't like the gov stepping in to tell people what they can or cannot do with their body.
I would like to see some checks and balances put in place though. Things like age verification, breathalizer, drug test, a class or video exploring the pros and cons with a test about the dangers and drawbacks, maybe even a mental health cert?
I’m fairly neutral about the whole thing. Though I’ve heard plenty of whining from people with full face/neck tattoos whining about discrimination in hiring because they made a stupid decision.
And it’s always someone else’s fault. And they shouldn’t be allowed to not hire them because they decided to get tatted up like a Gang member.
The average normie/hiring manager isn’t going to be able to tell the difference between a cool looking face tattoo gotten from a stupid decision and a Gang related face tattoo.
Does a not owner has a right to prohibit the way in which you use your own property? Can it proscribe rules and regulations on how to use it?
Is property absolute or subject to the whims of the localities majority?
If the government has the power the proscribe HOW a human face should look like in public (location), perhaps the government should also proscribe how to dress, how to walk, how to speak in the public square?
So the law n is aimed at the tatooist right. Theyre not allowed by this to tat the face or neck? I mean how do you enforce it. Freedom of speech alone would restict this.
How about banning them from receiving welfare.
You're free to get them, but if they make you unemployable, don't expect the citizens to pay you to sit on your ass all day.
🎯🎯
Yes to this!
Banning things only creates/fuels the forbidden fruit syndrome.
Let people suffer from their own stupidity.
Get rid of government sugar daddy.
Government is the problem, not the solution.
Look at prohibition, war on drugs, etc.
The government took control over a whorehouse due to unpaid taxes, the whorehouse went out of business.
If the government fails at the worlds oldest profession, why would you trust it with anything else?
🤣🤣🤣
That's a good one.....
Now do murder
Also, It's not about that. It's about US, we the people, having to look at these weirdos. It's also about mental illness. Because that's what face tattooes are: mental illness externalized. America is not an ancient tribe in africa or south america. We don't blow psychedelic snuff and tobacco powder up each others nostrils using long pipes. If you want that, then LEAVE
We have a culture, and face tattooes are a total disintegration of our culture, our ideas, our civilization, so if you want that, then please go to a society that has those things. And get killed by a giant snake 5 minutes later.
We don't want to see it. It looks like mental illness. It says run away. It's intimidating and scary because face tattooes are the shibboleth of criminals, pirates and murderers. We need it to stop, by banning tattoo parlors from tattoing the neck and face. The people are welcome to give themselves illegal tattooes but keep in mind, when they do, the employer will ask, why should I hire a criminal?
Self-Alteration/Medication = Murder/Suicide?
That’s quite the reach.
When did tattoos = criminal?
Military vets with tats will happily tell you to shove it up your ass lol.
True , Best to allow the dangerous ones to identify themselves.
"The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." --Thucydides 460 B.C. – 395 B.C.
The mental illness has been the hypnotized Citizens allowing their system to be corrupted by EVIL
The problem is that Government has made killing a murderer illegal. Fix that along with concealed carry laws and in short order murder will almost disappear as a street crime. Husbands ,wives & business partners much less affected.
Face tattoos are just a notice to lock & load upon sighting.
Who pays to support these tards when they cant get a job?
No one, stupid should hurt, pain like failure are the best teachers.
MAGA : Make Asylums Great Again
Agreed.
I hate tats and I've seen my fair share of shit tattoos I will say and I can't believe I'm saying this but I do agree this is a first amendment violation. You're free to do what you want when it comes to bad decisions and you can can reap the rewards of that.
Agreed, I can't stand those stupid nose rings that show men you're an un-datable low IQ whiny liberal woman but I'm not about to let the government enforce the removal of them.
Especially when it comes to our own bodies
How about banning the pants past their ass that the dindu's and white trash walk around in.
And make it a National ban!
I knew a policeman who liked those.. makes it harder to run. 😂
Pants around your knees, tattoos on your face, nose ring collecting boogers, "nah wut I'm sayn" after every sentence spoken, died purple hair with shaved sides, ridiculously spelled dindu names like Shawniqua, poor hygiene, black lives matter flags... these are all wonderful things if you think about it. They automatically tell us who to not hire, talk to, date or when to mark up prices.
"So again, are face and neck tattoos — particularly excessive ones — abhorrent?"
Some like this one are not only abhorrent but actively, aggressively threatening. Intimidating others, on purpose.
Free speech / art means I don't have to see it or buy it or go to that gallery.
This is too much in other people's faces.
P.S. more thoughts
Sound expression is more akin to "free speech" than visual "art" yet there are noise standards to prevent neighbors from being exposed to ear-blasting "music" and pedestrians from "ear blasting" from cars which make the cars vibrate. Imagine what it does to your ear drums and nervous system! Sound waves not only hit your ear drums, but all of the body's nervous system; think bass.
Is "gore porn" protected "speech" on city streets?? 8kun used to be attacked by post after post of gore porn; one could not hide the post after post after post without seeing them first! So I had to leave the site, as intended by the spammers. No matter if they were taken off later, one cannot "unsee".
Similarly, one cannot "unsee" tats obviously intended to intimidate, nor erase the logical response of the nervous system experiencing threat!
Especially frightening for children. My kid was so scared by some Halloween costumes she was literally shaking, even though I took her out early to avoid teens in horrible masks.
There are community standards, and "breaching the peace" was a very valid counterpoint to sounds and images intending indeed to disturb the peace.
Besides, face and neck tattoos cause brain damage from inks leaking into the body. /s and also /not s.
Plus the law does not arrest anyone expressing body "art"! It is regulating the tattoo business in its state.
There is a big difference between buying an art magazine with disgusting art in it
Or going to a gallery with disgusting art in it (crucifix in jar of urine)
VERSUS
Walking to a public transporation place and seeing DISGUSTING art on the walls
Or walking past people at the public transportation place and having no choice but to see disgusting ART on their faces
Art has a venue
When your face is the venue, the art becomes imposing advertisement and propaganda, no matter what it is, it's political. One cannot escape it, or choose not to see it
So the "but its my art, and my freedom of speech" doesn't hold up ANY MORE than NOT wearing clothes and saying MY NAKED BODY IS MY ART, even tho we have laws against public nudity, indecency and contributing to delinquency of a minor
Yes, that is the difference I see.
I have heard that "free speech" allows one to speak, but there is no right to be heard, or accepted as a member of civil society . . .
That's a weird law. You're for this? Just because you don't like something doesn't mean that the government needs to make it illegal. I think employers should be able to refuse these people jobs and that's good enough.
As retarded as face tats are, people are free to get them... this should be ruled unconstitutional
Some women tattoo eyebrows and eyeliner. Some even do lips to look like lipstick. Would those be banned too?
Currently, they are
Ban Whoopi Goldberg
How about we start by banning cutting of the junk of little boys and titties of our young girls. That’s where I want to start.
I'd like to add banning protestors wearing back-packs, and those wannabe journalists who use their cell phones and have "press" taped onto their clothing who think they can go wherever the fuck they want while filming at their protests...
It does make them unemployable.....
I agree.
Bring back the freak shows at the local/state fairs!!!!
IDK about that. The guys emptying my septic tanks last year had them.
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then....
I don't like the gov stepping in to tell people what they can or cannot do with their body.
I would like to see some checks and balances put in place though. Things like age verification, breathalizer, drug test, a class or video exploring the pros and cons with a test about the dangers and drawbacks, maybe even a mental health cert?
I’m fairly neutral about the whole thing. Though I’ve heard plenty of whining from people with full face/neck tattoos whining about discrimination in hiring because they made a stupid decision.
And it’s always someone else’s fault. And they shouldn’t be allowed to not hire them because they decided to get tatted up like a Gang member.
The average normie/hiring manager isn’t going to be able to tell the difference between a cool looking face tattoo gotten from a stupid decision and a Gang related face tattoo.
Question: who owns your body?
Does a not owner has a right to prohibit the way in which you use your own property? Can it proscribe rules and regulations on how to use it? Is property absolute or subject to the whims of the localities majority?
If the government has the power the proscribe HOW a human face should look like in public (location), perhaps the government should also proscribe how to dress, how to walk, how to speak in the public square?
What have we learned from .gov?
Disorderly conduct anyone?
FINALLY a law that makes sense
So the law n is aimed at the tatooist right. Theyre not allowed by this to tat the face or neck? I mean how do you enforce it. Freedom of speech alone would restict this.
Iirc messes with facial recognition technology.
As much as I’d like seeing this, 1st amendment freedom of speech. I don’t like it but Its their own body they have freedom on this.