https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency/comments
The Wartime Presidency SLAG Dec 3 17 20 A four part series that examine a “fail safe” option for saving the American Republic
Read →
Write a comment…
JFAnon9 hr ago I absolutely believe Trump devolved the government. Devolution is the only concept of which I’m aware that exists without apparent contradictions in current events.
It’s absolutely imperative that whatever actions are taken, it’s done 100% by-the-book to the degree that any action undertaken will survive the harshest future legal scrutiny. Whatever mechanisms are used to ‘right the ship’, they need to be legally unshakeable, especially if Trump ends up back in the White House.
As SLAG points out, the Constitution offers us no clear path. Yet I think it still plays a central role, specifically through the MIL oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
The military is the only way to restore America.
Without going into the weeds speculating how it will play out, at least from 100,000ft there’s no shortage of possibilities that could provide proof of some level of corruption and foreign control:
-Election audits
-The Durham and Weiss investigations
-The Maxwell trial
-The Juicy Sommelier trial
-Nuremburg 2.0 and the exposure of Fauci, Daszak, Pfizer and the medical-industrial complex
The problem is that a large percentage of the public will not see the proof because of MSM suppression.
I have no idea what event or happening will bring the MIL out of the shadows but I think it would need to create a Constitutional Crisis. Anything less would have the potential of MIL law being second-guessed.
Spitball:
What if election fraud perpetrated by enemies FOREIGN and domestic is proven on a Congressional level? Having these cases wind through the states feels like it will take an excessively long time but maybe that’s what needs to happen.
Unless someone like Eric Coomer has been flipped. What if he confesses and brings the receipts that among other things directly implicate the CCP?
No matter how the fraud is revealed, elections will be nullified and as @Andre points out, unrecoverable. MIL will have no choice but to step in because, outwardly, Continuity of Government will be jeopardized. MIL will then set into motion the process for new elections.
One more thing. The MIL take control of the MSM - hold that thought for a moment.
The important part of this spitball is that MIL will be publicly in control until the new elections. I don’t think this necessarily means that devolution will be revealed, however. I think the notion that the Biden admin has been presiding over and owns this shitshow is critical.
Flashback: On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the Law of War. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist. I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental. It’s almost as if the act of publishing/formalizing MIL process under the previous admin was a precondition for Trump announcing his candidacy
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. .
Before jumping to a few specifics relevant to SLAG’s questions, I want to explain why I think this entire concept is legally applicable.
According to 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
However, it further explains (and the footnotes add clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.
The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution.
OK - on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
-11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts their security.
-11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.)
-11.9.2.2 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example).
To the last of SLAG’s questions: Will there be trials?
Most definitely.
11.10.1.1 and 11.10.1.2 provide MIL with the authority to suspend ordinary (non-criminal) courts if they are corrupt, establish MIL courts to enforce civil laws (not just MIL laws) AND remove judges and prosecutors from office (see footnote - Hey, Binger and Fatlock, pay attention!)
Section 11.11 - Criminal Court is an extension of 11.10 Ordinary Court. It establishes further procedures to remain aligned with the occupied territory’s laws and the Geneva Convention (GC). I think this section would only apply to foreign nationals (not US citizens) in uniform as they would be defined as Protected Persons under the GC.
Not sure, I don’t believe US citizens who committed treason (spies or otherwise aided the enemy) are subject to GC protections and would likely face military tribunals and the death penalty.
I believe Antifa will be declared enemy combatants. I don’t believe they would be afforded GC protections as US citizens, .
Tribunals are very different from civilian court. The judges are the de facto jury, rules of evidence are different, and the defense has very little leeway in terms of delays and shenanigans. Tribunals are def expedited justice.
I wonder if MIL will publicly take charge before Durham or Weiss move into trial phase and the targets find themselves facing a MIL tribunal? That would be interesting, indeed.
I’m unclear as to whether this occupation would be solely at a Federal level, or if the MIL would also consider each state as occupied territory. I’m inclined to believe it could include states as occupied territory, which would allow the MIL to clean house and change election laws in blue states.
I think it’s critical that MIL occupation would be initiated under a non-Trump admin because optics are important.
I think the entirety of Chapter 11 provides a framework that ensures all actions will withstand any level of future scrutiny, while providing very generous leeway for MIL to
-Take control of public messaging
-Weed out corrupt officials
-Change corrupt laws.
-Mete out justice to traitors
THE BEST IS YET TO COME
END
https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency/comments
The Wartime Presidency SLAG Dec 3 17 20 A four part series that examine a “fail safe” option for saving the American Republic
Read →
Write a comment…
JFAnon9 hr ago I absolutely believe Trump devolved the government. Devolution is the only concept of which I’m aware that exists without apparent contradictions in current events.
It’s absolutely imperative that whatever actions are taken, it’s done 100% by-the-book to the degree that any action undertaken will survive the harshest future legal scrutiny. Whatever mechanisms are used to ‘right the ship’, they need to be legally unshakeable, especially if Trump ends up back in the White House.
As SLAG points out, the Constitution offers us no clear path. Yet I think it still plays a central role, specifically through the MIL oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
The military is the only way to restore America.
Without going into the weeds speculating how it will play out, at least from 100,000ft there’s no shortage of possibilities that could provide proof of some level of corruption and foreign control:
-Election audits
-The Durham and Weiss investigations
-The Maxwell trial
-The Juicy Sommelier trial
-Nuremburg 2.0 and the exposure of Fauci, Daszak, Pfizer and the medical-industrial complex
The problem is that a large percentage of the public will not see the proof because of MSM suppression.
I have no idea what event or happening will bring the MIL out of the shadows but I think it would need to create a Constitutional Crisis. Anything less would have the potential of MIL law being second-guessed.
Spitball:
What if election fraud perpetrated by enemies FOREIGN and domestic is proven on a Congressional level? Having these cases wind through the states feels like it will take an excessively long time but maybe that’s what needs to happen.
Unless someone like Eric Coomer has been flipped. What if he confesses and brings the receipts that among other things directly implicate the CCP?
No matter how the fraud is revealed, elections will be nullified and as @Andre points out, unrecoverable. MIL will have no choice but to step in because, outwardly, Continuity of Government will be jeopardized. MIL will then set into motion the process for new elections.
One more thing. The MIL take control of the MSM - hold that thought for a moment.
The important part of this spitball is that MIL will be publicly in control until the new elections. I don’t think this necessarily means that devolution will be revealed, however. I think the notion that the Biden admin has been presiding over and owns this shitshow is critical.
Flashback: On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the Law of War. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist. I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental. It’s almost as if the act of publishing/formalizing MIL process under the previous admin was a precondition for Trump announcing his candidacy
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. .
Before jumping to a few specifics relevant to SLAG’s questions, I want to explain why I think this entire concept is legally applicable.
According to 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
However, it further explains (and the footnotes add clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.
The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution.
OK - on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
-11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts their security.
-11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.)
-11.9.2.2 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example).
To the last of SLAG’s questions: Will there be trials?
Most definitely.
11.10.1.1 and 11.10.1.2 provide MIL with the authority to suspend ordinary (non-criminal) courts if they are corrupt, establish MIL courts to enforce civil laws (not just MIL laws) AND remove judges and prosecutors from office (see footnote - Hey, Binger and Fatlock, pay attention!)
Section 11.11 - Criminal Court is an extension of 11.10 Ordinary Court. It establishes further procedures to remain aligned with the occupied territory’s laws and the Geneva Convention (GC). I think this section would only apply to foreign nationals (not US citizens) in uniform as they would be defined as Protected Persons under the GC.
Not sure, I don’t believe US citizens who committed treason (spies or otherwise aided the enemy) are subject to GC protections and would likely face military tribunals and the death penalty.
I believe Antifa will be declared enemy combatants. I don’t believe they would be afforded GC protections as US citizens, .
Tribunals are very different from civilian court. The judges are the de facto jury, rules of evidence are different, and the defense has very little leeway in terms of delays and shenanigans. Tribunals are def expedited justice.
I wonder if MIL will publicly take charge before Durham or Weiss move into trial phase and the targets find themselves facing a MIL tribunal? That would be interesting, indeed.
I’m unclear as to whether this occupation would be solely at a Federal level, or if the MIL would also consider each state as occupied territory. I’m inclined to believe it could include states as occupied territory, which would allow the MIL to clean house and change election laws in blue states.
I think it’s critical that MIL occupation would be initiated under a non-Trump admin because optics are important.
I think the entirety of Chapter 11 provides a framework that ensures all actions will withstand any level of future scrutiny, while providing very generous leeway for MIL to
-Take control of public messaging
-Weed out corrupt officials
-Change corrupt laws.
-Mete out justice to traitors
THE BEST IS YET TO COME
END
One thing that came up loud and fucking clear that was never addressed by either party was the fact that a private citizen can't be impeached. At no point did the Dems explain their reasoning beyond "orange man bad". And the Trump team remained very coy on this issue as well. Trump referred to it as another hoax, but he never specifically pointed out that he was no longer President (as far as I recall. If I missed a statement that debunks this theory, please let me know). I know his lawyers made those statements, but looking back they seemed to be making them in an attempt to goad Dems into making an admission that would snowball everything.
Of course they didn't, still tried the Shampeachment and lost. But why did they still try it? Because they know he's secret President and were trying to use the system to legally remove Trump despite him activating emergency powers. Obviously that failed. Anyway, I just realized that the fake impeachment and further bastardization of our system actually tells us a lot more about what is happening than we realized and it pretty much vindicates the devolution theory. You can't impeach a private citizen and they did anyway... or did they? Most normies assume it didn't matter or that the Dems are just out of control... which they are but I do believe they were operating within the confines of the Constitution. Ethically speaking they are morally bankrupt. And our Impeachment system should prevent partyline peach minting. A 2/3rds majority should be required in both House and Senate, but that's another discussion.
Why would Flynn disavow Q if we aren't that close?
*less confident
I've yet to hear a good explanation for why Q would reveal what it did if it was a larp or a Deep State psyop. It feels much more likely to me that the narrative that Q is a larp or a psyop is the Deep State psyop. Before Q, only a handful of people were aware of the things it revealed. Now hundreds of millions do. Where would be the benefit to the Deep State in that?
I won't say I know for sure, but I feel confident that Q is real; that it's a quantum AI that foretold, and thus, guaranteed a particular future--one in which the cabal that runs the world is destroyed...but I'm less sure about other things.
Things I'm less sure about:
-
That Trump is part of the Q team and isn't Deep State controlled opposition.
-
That Devolution is happening.
I know I WANT those two things to be true, but I'm not convinced yet.
Things that make me wonder:
-
Trump's ties to and popularity within the state of Israel (I know Israel isn't a monolith. That it's multi-faceted and there are different factions within it, so I'm not convinced his ties to them is a bad thing, but I'm also not convinced they're a good thing either. It's very murky for me.)
-
Trump and Ivanka pushing the vaccine (It's one thing to do operation warp speed to "turn into the torpedo" so to speak, but now we know the vaccine is hurting people, I don't get the continued public support for it. This stuff is killing people. I'm not convinced he doesn't have a good angle on this, but I'm not convinced he does either. Perhaps this is part of "disinformation is necessary" but it really, really makes Trump look like the Fox News of politicians. Agrees with us on all the other stuff, but on the REALLY big stuff, stabs us in the back. I just don't know on this one).
-
Trump pushing Fauci's Regeneron (Why, after pushing HCQ for so long, did he opt for Fauci funded Regeneron when it was time to be treated? Why did he promised it to all Americans? He didn't give it to them, so maybe that was a fakeout, but I just don't know. How many angles can he play? I just don't know on this one either.)
-
Trump's friendship with Michael Jackson (on the one hand it makes me want to trust Michael Jackson more, and suspect that he was thrown under the bus to protect the music industry and hollywood pedos from further scrutiny, but on the other hand, I watched those men talk about Michael Jackson raping them and for me, they were awfully convincing. I'm just not sure.)
-
Q always said that disinformation was necessary. Could Trump being part of the Q team have been some of that necessary disinformation? Would Q have spread as far and wide as it did if it hadn't piggy packed off of Trump's popularity? Did the Deep State tell Trump to play along with the Q prophecies so they could ultimately discredit Q when Trump showed his true colors and supported the vaccine attack on America? I just don't know.
-
Trump doesn't talk like a Christian. He doesn't seem to follow Christ's advice on how to handle his enemies. And he makes very questionable hand signals that many have identified as being masonic. I'm not saying a guy has to be perfect, but I have to wonder how Trump seemed to miss the Sermon on the Mount so obviously. It was nice to have someone in politics stand up for us, to use the left's dirty tricks against them, but was that his tell that he was never who we thought he was? Was that his tell who he really followed and worked for?
I have to wonder. I really do.
Do I want Trump to be a good guy? Of course. I worship the ground he walked on for the past four years. Do I want Devolution to be happening? Yes of course. Especially if Trump is a good guy. But what if Devolution is happening and Trump isn't a good guy? Could this be the Deep State's final play to push our country into a civil war? The media is already talking about Trump's coup. We know the Deep State wants us to get into a civil war. It's war that leaves the power vaccum they need to take ultimate control. Maybe Devolution is the plan, but it's part of the evil plan?
I don't know. I was just watching The Hunger Games series this week with my wife and some friends and some things really stood out to me. One was the line "Remember who the real enemy is." The other was the apparent Savior, President Coin, who turned out to be more of the same. Who was playing on everyone's hatred of President Snow just so she could rise to power and it made me shudder a bit.
I don't know. I just don't know what to think anymore. The only thing I feel confident about at this point is that Q is real, and that a brighter future is ahead. But we know wolves will always come in sheep's clothing. I just hope Trump is the sheep in wolf's clothing I always hoped he was. And not just another wolf underneath.
If we accept Devolution as fact then that would conclude that Trump will step in any second now to prevent the economic collapse, right?
Well... what if instead there is already a plan in place to respond should and more likely when that will occur?
I read a theory some time last year about Trump announcing the end of the Fed over a three day media blackout that also included similar claims to the EAS theories. It theorized that Trump had established a gold backed currency that was completely decentralized and would immediately replace the Fed. I don't remember all the specific details, but I remember it seeming plausible enough to have some hope in...
As we know that didn't happen... or rather it hasn't happened yet. I do think this theory might have actually had some weight to it if we consider it in terms of deltas. Now I am not suggesting this exact theory is correct, but I do think Trump does have a gold backed economy ready to replace this debt based one at a moment's notice. Trump talked long and often about going back to the Gold Standard and seemed to hint at having started that process.
Basically, don't waste energy dooming over a failed economic system. The USD is only as good as the people who believe in it and that faith is very fragile. Trump hasn't left us to die, but even if he had that wouldn't matter. The plan means nothing if we don't get involved. Also, buy some silver while you still can.
"I can only tell you what I believe is going on in the simplest of terms: Devolution is a constitutional mechanism to maintain a functioning government in the event of an occupation or infiltration. The powers of the Commander in Chief are devolved into the duties of 11 Combat Commanders.
Additionally, there are several Executive Orders (some Trump signed others by previous presidents) that deal with Continuity of Govt.
It is a fact that Trump signed EOs relating to continuity of govt (EO13961) under various states of emergency.
Together, Devolution and/or Continuity of Government have been in play to box the current resident and keep the National Essential Functions in place."
The poster nailed it, what do you think? I've been digging on the internet trying to find information I can show others. I
Aside from Patel patriot , I’ve seen a few devolution authors posted here . I have the next week off and would love to dig in deeper! Any help ?
Just updoot either yes or no.
