if there were only one interpretation of scripture, there would only be one denomination of Christianity. The practise of praying to Mary is neither encouraged nor forbidden in the Bible. Pray the way you want. Just have faith.
i think things will still continue to take some time, to implement policies focused on letting humanity flourish, instead of suppressing and poisoning us.
when we see what humanity looks like flourishing in the 21st century, we might discover even more harmonious ways to function as a society. the deception-based two party system will be history, in favour of a genuine republic... but a republic unlike any we've experienced, based on increasingly wild technology.
and with that technology comes knowledge. real, actual science, further revealing the true nature of creation.
so yeah, not sure what it will look like, but i'm excited. also i have that sweet societal example given by aliens, if anyone wants to hear that again. but its pretty long.
Controlled opposition is when you prop someone up to pose as your opponent, when in fact they take orders from you.
if he's meant to appear as our opposition but is in fact our asset, that would be controlled opposition.
if he were the left's 'controlled opposition', he would (unconvincingly) appear to be a right winger, while actually being controlled by and an asset of the left.
if he's not under our control, then he's not our controlled opposition. just a shill.
I get that, but... you don't think its even a little disingenuous to just lump the mother of God in with the rest of His servants?
she shouldn't even be lumped in with the saints... ...who Catholics also pray to. obviously you won't get that either, but that doesn't make it forbidden.
Megan Rose Medium has said some very interesting things about Elon.. unfortunately that video seems to have been removed from youtube unless i'm just missing it.
i have no trouble believing he's not from around here. The most surprising thing would be learning we have that much help from aliens. i kinda thought they weren't allowed to do that. but hey, i'm grateful for any involvement
the real story has been told in great detail, and you'll love it!
their difference from us are a result of some pretty bold choices in their past.
basically, they're from a timeline which resulted in the transhumanist dystopia that some people in our culture fear we will reach.
they were very technologically advanced, and used their genetic tech to enhance the power of their own minds.
they were successful in this, but they grew arrogant in their abilities. conflicts arose, and it was determined that emotions were to blame... they concluded that emotionality should be suppressed, and so they did this genetically.
So through their technological hubris, they'd managed to tweak themselves and their environment beyond repair. the atmosphere degrades, and they are forced to modify themselves even further. Eventually the environment is too harsh for them to adapt to, and they retreat beneath the surface of their world, forcing even further modifications.
so at this point they've really begun to come to terms with the fact that they screwed up... and there's a wild twist here, but its so weird it almost detracts from the rest of the story. stranger than fiction stuff.
suffice to say they've had a long and humbling journey... they are in a perfect position to speak on the importance of empathy, emotionality, and humanity, and to help us avoid a path similar to their own.
really curious about your source, if you don't mind. i have a much different perspective, but maybe not incompatible. there are rogue groups of greys, but overall they are very much intertwined with humanity. they were once very similar; a parallel version of us. to make a very long and fascinating story short, they screwed up. they modified themselves and their environment beyond repair. the only way to save their species was to find a parallel version of themselves to restore parts of their DNA that had been lost.
That is the most prominent agenda of the Greys. To repair the damage they have done to their own species, through cooperation with humans and use of our DNA. the operation is well underway.
maybe that sounds scary to someone, but I am beyond optimistic. When it comes to these subjects, I've found that the scarier something sounds, the harder it is to verify... Because the truth out there is ultimately good.
Its the CIA's job to make us think aliens are the bad guys, instead of them. so take the ET fear porn with a huge grain of salt.
glad to have you here, fren. not too many points of contention:
its important to note that there is no such thing as a human soul. we are all just souls, and none of our souls originated on Earth. But we can agree that a certain type has been attempting to run the show here, against our best interests. I don't think its inaccurate to say lucifer, but i think we will be able to get much more specific than that when more history comes to light.
the 'Grey' alien abduction phenomenon is not a cover-up, even if its been used as one. ETs are/were borrowing humans for tests, and in the earlier stages they made no concessions for human emotions such as fear. Now they're able to be much more empathetic, and the whole project goes a lot smoother.
gotta fact check you on the last bit. cabal does their share of kidnapping, but there is an ET agenda with human DNA that has involved detainment and experimentation. That's not a coverup.
believe it or not, the agenda is positive, and in alignment with our own. the execution was flawed for a long time, but has improved.
cabal will absolutely try to spin the situation for their own purposes, but to them the ET involvement is just another unsolvable factor.
if they didn't hold those beliefs, we'd have no Amish community. do you think there should be only one type of Christianity? I think you've just provided a good example of why its healthy to allow a wide variety of beliefs.
I can appreciate the discussion, but I don't think its worth cancelling each other over.
belief and action are really two sides of the same coin. some people find faith and are compelled to kneel, others kneel first, and in doing so, find faith.
Clearly others have interpreted Biblical text differently than yourself. My beliefs don't have to make sense to you if they make sense to me. I don't think its a stretch to consider Mary worthy of prayer if she was worthy of bearing God's son. If you don't understand how that's relevant, then just stick to God. Simple as.
I can see how there could be disagreements, but I can't come to the same conclusions that you have. and I really don't see any value in trying to emphasize differences between Christians on this platform. I know we have atheists and Jews here, and I'd be willing to bet we have a handful of Muslims and witches as well. Can we just appreciate the people that speak up against evil, such as Vigano?
i don't see much of an attempt to salvage the military, and that leads me to believe it isn't necessary.
I think Q has shown that a massive number of bodies and tanks is not the only way to fight a war. ...That said, I wouldn't rule out that we have a massive force, separate from the one people are familiar with.
there are some very interesting sources that speak of a secret white hat military force. if they're to be believed, we have nothing to worry about. which seems to be Q's perspective as well.
I can see where you're coming from, I just don't think the Catholic position is any less valid than your own. Does praying to the mother of God glorify God? Why shouldn't it?
to me it seems like the depth of symbolism in the Catholic church is indicative of the depth of symbolism in the Bible. Simple and complex are not mutually exclusive terms.
and hey, i've even resisted mentioning the whole 'faith without works' thing. in which i usually favour faith as well, but certainly not at the prohibition of 'works'.
Whenever i hear stuff against the Catholic church, its either from reeeing atheists, or the kind of people who think having a painting or poster on your wall or a wooden bracelet is idolatry. all of whom are entitled to their opinions...
but the only ones I find credible are those who point out that the pope is a pedophile and the church has been infiltrated. because that's not ridiculous.
the rest is just more of the same theological debate that's been going on since forever. honestly, I think that debate should be discouraged on GAW. this is not the place to gatekeep Christianity and push your own brand.
whoa, yeezy comms