Agree. This is low effort propaganda designed to make it seem like vaccines are safe.
I would take the money and sell them anyway. Would be a fun court case to be a part of
Porn is a tool that fulfills a desire which is a symptom of lust which is a symptom of evil which grows from a lack of purpose, a lack of hope, and a lack of faith.
I'm seeing a lot of online responses indicating it was a cyber ninja mishap. I'm also not seeing any refutation to their claims on here. If they were lying there would be post after post shredding their claims to pieces.
Deleting records, files, databases, schemas, etc cannot be a new thing. I suspect there is a way to have permanent deletion which would raise huge red flags or they weren't permanently deleted and the ability to recover it all is basically a step by step process.
Is there a link to this so we can share it
Is it possible for them to delete the files and then ensure that recovered files are fake?
You can run stored procedures that call other programming languages such as R and Python to name a few.
It's probably a fake account, dispatched by some loser organization
Also, consider that these folks were willing to be traitors. How does the DS know they wouldn't betray them eventually? Why manage that risk when you eliminate the risk?
Where did you get your timeline from?
Not sure why a particular comment was removed but it stated that the dems will be more empowered to split as well, which is a good thing.
I agree. A) no one knows what the plan really is. B) no one know what the timeline is. C) no one is allowed to participate in any meaningful way. D) if a plan does exist those in charge should know that there is a tremendous amount of "faith in men" required which goes against most peoples belief systems.
The goals are why I stick around but damn, what the fuck is blocking them from proceeding?
Troll. You have no rational argument to my responses so you keep replying with no substance.
Why don't you tell everyone here how your faith is the only real faith and that we should only listen to you? See how that goes.
Projection at its finest
Thanks for the declaration Michael Scott
Out of context quote. Several things wrong with your comment: 1) you don't actually know what the book consisted of when that was written, 2) should people not read any other book ever? 3) Should they never read any other book that talks about God? 4) should you not listen to anyone else when it comes to God - their words could be put in a book and therefore by your logic, they should not be read, and the larger implication is that you shouldn't listen to anyone who talks about God. 5) Christians aren't a unified group so how to you reconcile / adjudicate which one is correct? Some say Enoch should be in, some say Enoch and the Gnostic books should be in, some say they shouldn't. Who is right? How do you know?
Also check out the book of Enoch which was not included in the Bible but many argue should have been
If you have Amazon Prime, check out the show Psych for a good laugh. Probably one of the best shows ever made. It sounds like you haven't had a good laugh in a while and given your overwhelming liberal surroundings (I can relate, used to live in the bay area) I'm guessing there aren't too many folks for you to crack jokes with. It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks of you.
At some point money becomes irrelevant and what you stand for takes precedence. He seems to have fuck you money and it sounds he's saying fuck you to the corruption. I've seen born again Christians and they can be a little overwhelming in terms of following the rules at the expense of mercy and patience and I think he may have a bit of that going on.
More subjective deadlines...
I watched a youtube video on this earlier. I thought he bought it for 5M and spend quite a bit more on renovations, additions, upgrades, artwork, etc. There are something like 58 residence quarters and the guy in the video said that the membership fee is around 200k, you have to spend a certain amount on food as well (probably other stuff too).
Another deadline within your message... Where are these deadlines coming from? I'm confused.
Why did they lock the thread?
I'm curious about their communication strategy. Given their current sample size, and how that's well beyond min sample sizes to draw conclusions, they must already know the outcome and the fraud rates by fraud method. They must have had some confidential chats with people from the other states to get them on board to conduct their own audits which makes me think they have some damning proof. I suppose it would also make sense not to prematurely announce the outcome and invite retaliation before they finish...