by SNRNXS
4
AllowMeToExplain 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was literally like one of those nightmares where you are shouting/screaming and nobody can hear you. Even now, with regret, they still don’t fully acknowledge that I tried to prevent this. I’m still shocked. Why is a doctor more credible than me when discussing political issues? Because that’s what this is…its not science or medicine.

That’s another thing that all of this highlights. Look at the near universal support for lockdowns at the beginning. People believed the narrative, and felt caution to be prudent. After muh 2 more weeks to flatten the curve, those numbers broke down on party lines.

In the same way that “climate change” is not a science issue, so jabs are political and not medical. I cannot think of any example where people break down on party lines on “science.” It’s always politics. That’s how you can spot the rouse.

4
AllowMeToExplain 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was about to suggest that this only adds insult to injury. I suppose it is better than a kick in the dick. But that money isn’t remotely sufficient to cover the harm caused.

by SNRNXS
24
AllowMeToExplain 24 points ago +24 / -0

Very sorry to hear. I got into big time arguments with my family and ended up frickin begging them not to get the jab. My dad lost his hearing. My mom has had fainting spells. My brother in law’s dad has had 3 massive seizures lasting 16, 19, and 22 minutes.

My niece ended up hospitalized for an emergency appendectomy and heart issue. And is now epileptic. She has had 2 massive seizures in class. And some others outside of school. My nephew has now been hospitalized twice for pleurisy. My cousin has phantom nerve pain and requires a pain pump. My aunt has stage 2 breast cancer. My uncle suddenly cannot eat more than 4 types of food without the type of gastric distress that results in a week long hospital stay for the inflammation.

This list hasn’t even touched friends and their family members. Anyone who shilled this poison or forced it needs to swing from the gallows. In public. And on 4K tv live stream. This is beyond not ok.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is cold season though. Probably got that common cold myo and pericarditis combo that tv reporter told us about this week.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d like to see King Charles step in and shut that down. Technically, he could lol

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sweet! Now we can do the “omfg SCOTUS did something totally standard that they do for every single case that asks 2.0” on this same one. ItS tOtAlLy HaBbEnIn this time!@!

I’m not gonna go on a rant. I have detailed all the bullshit in this lawsuit. You can search my post history if you are so inclined. People are sending these complete buffoons money. We @ GAW are better than letting clowns capitalize off of our righteous outrage at flagrant election fraud and stolen elections. Snake Hopium salesmen have a special place in hell.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe. But doubtful. Damages don’t come from the provision of said IP, but rather the use. Which was exclusively twitter’s in this circumstance. Best case scenario is some type of joint and several liability. But unless Uncle Sam consents to be sued in this circumstance you cannot sue them over it.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of them rolled their shares into the new twitter that is private. I want to say that saved him like 2 billion or something. Not quite sure.

In ordinary fraud cases, you sell me something based on fraud, I sue you for rescission, you give me my money back. How does that work with a publicly traded company? How can you rescind a contract in this circumstance? Given that there isn’t anyone with deep enough pockets to pay the unlicensed IP use damages, there’s also nobody to get your 50 billion back from. That’s fucked. No idea what could happen there.

8
AllowMeToExplain 8 points ago +8 / -0

This isn’t idiocy. But the tweet talking about this should be read at face value. There seems to be some confusion from the comments on that tweet. Some people seem to think that this was some sort of oversight on Musk’s part, like as if the contract didn’t contain the entirety of twitter. What it is saying is that Twitter (1) is just stealing intellectual property and weaving it into their business without the right to do so; and (2) represented to Musk that it was not doing so. Twitter had a duty to be truthful and forthcoming with this information prior to making any deal because it is material to any prospective new owner.

If the potential damages from such unlicensed use are substantial, it would be grounds to void the contract and seek major damages. Twitter didn’t exactly have a laundry list of potential buyers. It could be felony theft by deception, too.

Hypothetically, if shit hit the fan and this was a multi billion dollar unlicensed use of IP, where does Elon go for damages? This I have no answer for. Are individual shareholders going to be liable? I doubt it. Who else has pockets deep enough who would be culpable here to cough up that kind of cash? I don’t know how you’d rescind this contract and get all your money back at this point, either. If you can’t recover the damages, how are you going to recover 10x that number to undo the deal?

6
AllowMeToExplain 6 points ago +6 / -0

The defense budget is for sure a big grift. If war truly cost what we are paying, the world would be at permanent peace. Because everyone else is too poor to afford to fight war. The annual budget is at damn near a million dollars per active duty troop.

I have loved planes since I was a kid. Especially fighters. You know what is fake n gay af? The price we paid for f35s. Over a damn trillion dollars…sorry, calling bullshit. That plane doesn’t cost that much. And it isn’t a monumental leap over the f22. Plus, it sounds like it still doesn’t work as advertised.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.findlaw.com/state/new-mexico-law/new-mexico-first-degree-murder.html

“By an act which is greatly dangerous to another's life and evidences a depraved mind which has no regard for human life“

So among the standard 1st degree murder types, New Mexico is the only state I have ever seen making “depraved heart murder” a first degree capital offense. Not a lot of states even have this law. It goes back to the common law and is essentially a form of extremely reckless and egregious homicide.

https://esfandilawfirm.com/depraved-heart-murder/

California has it, and the link above is a good brief intro. People v. Knoller was a pretty big case in California about this. Those moron defendants did a lot of press conferences. I think there is even a made for TV movie about it.

Shooting your rifle in the air on New Years and then wherever the bullet came down it killed someone, if your state has this statute you will be charged with depraved heart murder.

To me, in the aggregate, all of these “reckless” examples rise to a depraved level. He should be charged with 1st degree depraved heart murder imo.

On another note, why why why are news sites reporting legal matters WITHOUT the damn filings from the case? Ive been trying to hunt down the probable cause statement and I cannot find it anywhere.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is just for the lulz. Whenever that committee has a hearing, she will get to chime in. Hilarity will ensue.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I skipped surgery. The pain was so horrible and my quality of life so poor for quite a few months I was getting desperate. A friend of mine is a doctor - not a neurosurgeon or orthopedic - and he told me he had a similar issue with his disc. But said that the literature shows people who get the surgery have an average of 3.7 more surgeries on their backs over their lifetime. I decided to tough it out and now I am in an ok position.

I would love some details on this! Not sure quite what you are describing but anything that helps would be awesome, thank you!

4
AllowMeToExplain 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t even know where to begin with that whole nonsense. I have never understood it. (1) why do women wear things that will predictably draw attention to themselves and not necessarily positive? And (2) why do many lose their shit when they receive the predictable response?

About 6 years ago, my old geezer self uncovered a medical issue that caused me to have some weight issues in my mid 20s. To stay stable, I had to work out a lot more than reasonable while also watching my diet a lot more than reasonable. Once the issue got fixed, that was no longer necessary. I had the hair brained idea to go on a fitness binge.

Not that anyone cares, but I got pretty damn ripped. Bench was over 300lbs and I was squatting close to 500lbs. I also ran 5 miles at least 4-5 days a week. 20.5” arms. All at 180lbs. My wife had to support my efforts…couldn’t have taken care of myself AND gone to work by myself. I told you that to tell you this: there is no frickin way that I would wear some kind of crop top to show my abs. Granted, dudes get less leeway with that; but I also don’t care what people think. The most “revealing” clothing I would wear were some custom tailored suits. This sadly ended upon the devestation and destruction of my L5/S1 joint and I barely can walk for cardio now. Plus squats are permanently banned…😭

I feel bad for this generation of women. I would have probably enjoyed this back in my younger days, but I cannot imagine the social pressure of thong bikinis being basically standard now. Even as a guy, thinking of being that practically naked in public gives me anxiety. Not to mention my college daughter…thankfully I have no part in those discussions - wife territory.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t remember bush in the 90s…the 70s and 80s though…

I can only imagine the stench out there. Like a set from HBO’s real sex crossed with a pallet of recalled starkist tuna. 🤢

13
AllowMeToExplain 13 points ago +13 / -0

I still struggle to understand this. If DeSanctimonious is not a globalist RINO, wouldn’t his globalist RINO supporters already know this? So why would they back him?

6
AllowMeToExplain 6 points ago +6 / -0

They love him over at PDW. A rather entertaining event took place with ‘ole bill and that crew about 18 months or so ago. Lots of lulz.

So Bill Mitchell decided to make an account on PDW and openly advertise it was his. In some post, he was either commenting in favor of red flag laws for guns, or he was being called out for his position on this. One of the mods called him a faggot. He then went on gab or twitter or wherever his drivel is spouted and said not to go to that place, people are insane. And he noted that one of the mods even called him a faggot.

From that point forward, and lasting quite a bit of time, the word “faggot” was replaced by “bill Mitchell.” You still see that reference sometimes even now. And you’ll see occasional posts “just a reminder - Bill Mitchell is a faggot”

Pretty damn funny lol

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

That district needs to immediately terminate their legal counsel. This type of speech restraint in public schools has been ruled unconstitutional repeatedly since the 60s. The school board and administration should also be tossed out on their ears for wasting all that money this kid is going to get from the suit.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://medicalmalpracticelawyers.com/michigan-medical-malpractice-physician-complaints-and-disciplinary-actions/

“The Michigan Board of Medicine was originally established in 1899. The Board sets the minimum entry level competency of medical doctors (MDs) and the requirements for continuing medical education for MDs during their licensure. The Board is also responsible for disciplinary action against licensees who violate the Michigan Public Health Code. The Board is made up of 19 members: 10 medical doctors, 1 physician assistant, and 8 public members.”

But ya, I am totally confused on how medical boards work. They just censure/suspend/terminate licenses with no investigation or evidence at all.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

There ought to be a saying if there isn't. People are so dumb and shortsighted, they don't realize that "technicality" = violation of law or constitutional rights.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you think they investigate malpractice without your medical records, guy?

Your state health and human services will also audit medical records when auditing medicare/medicaid billing. Insurance companies also audit providers records. Which = your records.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya its ridiculous. You have 4th amendment protections unless you don’t. They have carved out so many exceptions and exigencies it has lost most of its meaning. All because “we can’t have the guilty get off on a technicality” so they uphold or reverse with the stupidest logic.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›