2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was at the doctors office last week, here in the states, and in the south, and doctor said RSV, which is very contagious respiratory disease, is flying through daycares right now, and older susceptible people are catching it from the children.

I had overhead him talking to his NP about it, and so asked him. His aunt, who has COPD had caught it and was in hospital. He didn’t tell me, but in the overheard conversation I had heard him saying how to had to stress to his aunt that it was not covid. It sounded like she believed it be, but no testing showed that.

He’s never talked to me about Covid, or asked me about it, or about the vax, or anything. Spouse said that same NP has gone off to him about this whole Covid thing making zero sense, so I’m guessing they are hold-outs. I’m just thankful he doesn’t bring it up to me, so I don’t dare mention it.

3
Alternate_ID 3 points ago +3 / -0

Post office is doing the same thing. They’re using it to negotiate gimmes

2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +3 / -1

Brave. They don’t link to other’s databases for search finds, they are creating their own. They will get better as people use it. Dude is absolutely based. I have used it for 6 months now. Excellent, it is

3
Alternate_ID 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn’t China have rule that women can’t get pregnant until 6 months after the vaccine? Seems like I’ve seen something to that effect a couple of times.

3
Alternate_ID 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea, that one hit me in the pit of stomach. These people just don’t know what they don’t know. Which I’m okay with. But then for them to take the self-righteous, virtuous stance on top of that, (can really raise one’s blood pressure, giving truth to the old adages about the road less traveled.

3
Alternate_ID 3 points ago +3 / -0

Came here looking for this. Says it all, doesn’t it??

3
Alternate_ID 3 points ago +3 / -0

Brave’s search engine does not use anyone else’s database. It is building its own, and will get better each time it is used. The owner is extremely redpilled

7
Alternate_ID 7 points ago +7 / -0

I would argue that many simply aren’t on the internet, and have never had an alternate point of view other than MSM.

It’s not that they are dumb or stupid, and I don’t think we should think of them that way, or portray them that way, but that’s just me.

(Sorry, it just hurts when I see these types of comments, and then look at my lovely, diligent, deeply patriotic, Christian, more-conservative-than-us parents, and also aunts, uncles, and cousins, and all of their friends.)

They made a conscious decision to not submit themselves to the cesspool that is the internet. That does not make them dumb or stupid or chucks or people who don’t care. They do care, deeply.

3
Alternate_ID 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s pretty dang cool. Congrats!

2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +2 / -0

One thing I noticed for sure- (esp on p.w)- it’s very obvious when sensitive subjects come up that the troll farms have been triggered. (Sensitive for them- like the AZ election, for instance, or a post about one of their saints) The downvotes will be off the charts, and on every single comment, and there will be an unusual amount of “deleted* comments.

It’s almost funny bc it’s like they’re giving their game away, but it also shows how regularly they visit the site, and everyone should take heed of that. They’re always there, but sometimes they just can’t help themselves sometimes when their feelings get hurt.

1
Alternate_ID 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, I do believe in germ “theory”.

There are bad things out there that can infect people for a variety of reasons, including ignoring your role in own health, and that includes not keeping the correct balance of what your body needs to properly defend itself. Medicine today 100% ignores that beyond “don’t smoke, don’t drink, and lose weight.)

But those things alone, cannot save everyone from infection by “germs”, for a variety of reasons, including genetics.

There’s a reason the average lifespan has doubled and tripled in the past few thousands years, most notably in the last century, when modern medicine came along. (Real modern medicine, when it was practiced in life or death situations only, and the proactive stance that we play a part in keeping our own selve’s healthy. Those were both huge leaps that allowed us to have the average lifespan of what? 79 years now? Real medicine is not this money making machine that it is today)

1
Alternate_ID 1 point ago +1 / -0

ADE is a separate phenomenon from what happened with how virulent Marek’s became in chickens. Two separate and equally frightening issues.

(I am actually more afraid of ADE for those who have taken it, I do agree with you there.)

And the way they approached giving the vaccines, in the middle of a pandemic, where most still aren’t vaccinated and aren’t all get vaccinated at the same time, only allows the virus to learn the tricks to get around those who are vaccinated. (Like stopping antibiotics too early.). Usually they evolve naturally to be less virulent, but it’s a crap shoot when something like mRNA manipulation is mixed in with that evolution. (Look at all of the antibiotic-resistant bacteria’s out there currently- many evolved to not only be antibiotic resistant, but also to spread easier, and cause more damage. (Antibiotic resistant TB, Staph, UTI’s, C-Diff)

ADE makes some of your generic antibodies, the ones who can adapt to any disease they encounter and successfully fight it, it dampens/removes their unique ability. This because of the super antibodies (artificially created by the mRNA changes), which have only the ability to fight one specific thing. (The artificially induced antibodies take over, but they are only designed against one particular disease.). This is ADE and it is separate from the Marek’s scenario. (If I’m not mistaken, certain polio vaccines given in Africa caused the wild polio to become spread easier and are more virulent.)

When very young, and then going into the elderly years- the generic antibodies are not in production, and that is why they are susceptible to diseases others are not. The vaccine can cause even those normally capable of this antibody production, to no longer be able to produce it. Or, if they are produced, they go dormant due to the super antibodies created against one specific disease only.

4
Alternate_ID 4 points ago +7 / -3

I’m trying to imagine how one would even know that. Like, did you know how many you had and then noticed they were no longer there/that the numbers had changed? Do you regularly go through old posts to see what the up/down totals are? The only way I ever even realize someone has downvoted (or upvoted) something is if I get response on something, that takes me back to the original post. (I know how to look, I just never do.) How do you know it was the same person? I’m not being facetious, I am honestly asking how one would come to the conclusion that it was one person doing all the downvoting.

by Restore
2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +2 / -0

cool

Thank you!

2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think there’s a real possibility that super Covid develops if enough people get vaccinated, which would mean every person not vaccinated would be prone to being killed by the newly evolved 100% lethal version, in its attempt to find new hosts since it can’t affect the vaccinated hosts as effectively anymore.

It a real possibility, and what many who have absconded from the medical scene have been tying to warn people about. (See Marek’s disease for what mRNA “vaccine” did to it)

We’re damned if we do take it, and damned if we don’t, now that this has been unleashed on mankind.

by Restore
2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you quote something? Like with the big red double apostrophes?

1
Alternate_ID 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have telegram and can’t get this link to open it. Looks like it’s the web-based version, but no option to sign in. Never seen a telegram link so this- it always just opens in the app

1
Alternate_ID 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I don’t like using the “not-approved FDA” argument, bc eventually it will be approved, and that argument will specifically be used against them in the future.

But that’s just me. And it’s bc we 100% know that they are going to approve it, no matter how many people die, get blood clots, damaged hearts, or the fact that it will could cause super deadly Covid to evolve, bc that’s what leaky “vaccines” have the potential to do.

1
Alternate_ID 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re one of those who cheered on the Patriot Act, aren’t you? Never able to see how abuse could occur, bc you still honestly believe everyone is still just “so good” inside.

Bad actors control what gets seen. Example: one kid is bullied for months by another kid. The bullied kid suddenly stands up, but only his response is broadcast to the masses. The masses then come for the kid and his parents, and “demand” something be done to this kid (who finally stood up for himself).

If you don’t have the furtive imagination to think of what the deep state might manipulate to satisfy their own agenda, look no further than the Patriot act.

But “it’s live-streamed”. Okay..... who is watching 24/7? With how nefarious we know people to be, who’s not to say that that can’t be manipulated? Basic bank robbers have done that to security cameras for years.

Put nothing past these people. If it sounds like a perfect answer to something that otherwise takes a lot of work- then it’s just that...... too good to be true. Literally.

How much lazier do we have to get.

2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who’s in charge of reviewing and releasing the videos? Same thing as who counts the votes? Be careful of the nightmare you wish for

1
Alternate_ID 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yea. I went through thru the same thing with my kids. Someone stole an expensive item out of their backpack. When we asked for the security cameras- were told they were not for our consumption. Think they would have said that if it was one child accosting another?

Did that question just make you wonder to yourself “depends on the color”? Well, that’s how 24/7 recorded life will be. It will groupthink activated only for certain favored groups and desires public social positions, and NEVER for the everyday person.

2
Alternate_ID 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. No more surveillance. Let people deal with problems organically. Humans were not meant to be surveilled 24/7. Find another way. It may be harder to do, like putting pressure on people to behave and confronting bad actors, but it is 100% better than having 24/7 of our lives recorded to be submitted to the judgment of groupthink. Especially considering how easy it is to manipulate groupthink. DONT even think about this. If it can be used to help you now, it will used against you when the next bad actor comes into power.

HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING?

view more: ‹ Prev