The college professor who gave you that low grade is subsidized by the system, and his career is protected by the system, so his corrupt butt will fight to protect the system.
The beauty of the system is that he might not even do it consciously.
Because they don’t serve us and it’s much harder to hold a 1500 page bill with infinite disagreements accountable than 2500 one page bills.
“The money isn’t going to launder itself.” — Congress
It’s an exclusive club, welcome to it! We’ll get you a decoder ring!
And you may want to re-read because I think my joke didn’t get caught
I’m not blonde though, will need a different one! 😁
I’m always amazed when people in this movement jump from “he’s on our side” to “TRAITOR! ENEMY!” based off one piece of questionable evidence.
As if we are able to know what’s going on and judge it somberly and accurately from within fog of war.
Lots of people I really respect do this all the time. It’s amazing to watch. Must be a personality type thing, where people who are better at making quick decisions jump to doing what they do with inadequate data - strength turned into a weakness.
That’s your excuse.
Please make one up for me now because I was about to post the same comment.
Thanks!
Justine Trudeauont Extra Delicate Sanitary Wipes for Burdensome People. Napkins dispensed through the piehole of his blackface photo.
Manufactured by a publicly governed trust whose board can consist only of people kicked off their native lands, on a limited rotation, and exclusively uses resources from property seized from J.D. Irving as part of a long-term nature restoration project.
Advertising Campaign to star Dave Foley and Broken Lizard. “They’re so soft, even a Treasonous Cuban Bastard could use them.”
Cut to footage of Justin wearing an ankle weight in Guantanamo next to his prison daddy, “I’m Justin Castro, and I endorse this message”.
I’ve seen some pretty deep digs on that claim before, but all I’m seeing now is “that’s fake” from ukrainianfactchecking and “that’s for real” from beforeitsnews, even on yandex.
Is this how we make fresh Pepe’s?
His possessing spirit goes by the name “Al Sharpton” on this side of the pond, among others.
Don’t expect the demon to recant, but we have to figure out how to drive him out of his “residence”.
Ephesians 6:12. Very literally.
“Stop trying to brainwash women with your patriarchy bullshit, bigot.”
There’s this thing that gaslighters and mental enslavers do where they warn against the key ways that someone might try to free them from their mental prisons, accusing people who would do so of trying to enslave the person. When done successfully, the victim will then fight the liberator to stay in chains.
For example, if someone hated black people and wanted them in perpetual debt, they might try and convince them that holding a solvent budget while living frugally, practicing wise investment, delaying self gratification, and working diligently, are all tricks of the white man designed to keep them from getting the things they want and excluding black people from enjoying wealth, when in reality these are wealth building mechanisms, and it is the person trying to sell bad financial practices to someone by exploiting their fears and misgivings who is trying to keep that person down.
Once the person adopts that narrative, they will defend it, no matter how ridiculous it is. Feminism exploits women the same way - frames men as the enemy, selfishness as liberation, self-gratification and destruction of society as the path to gain happiness.
I suspect that the means to overcome this is by finding the emotional need that the false story is meeting, and telling a better story that meets the same emotional need while leading that person to the truth.
We got any writers in here?
It’s perfectly fine to hate things, if the thing should be hated. Hate sin, for example. Love righteousness.
So they claim they love what they define as righteousness and hate what they define as our sins, which does indeed justify them within their perceived paradigm.
The key point is if they got those definitions right, and the answer is “only to someone whose perceptions are molded by Satan.”
Ummmm.. why was potentially exonerating evidence, that could have defused worldwide riots, denied access?
Did they want to ensure he was guilty and stoke riots? Wouldn’t that make the judges and lawyers responsible for the ruling legally liable for damages?
Huh. Interesting.
That’s the trick… they do have the second amendment.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
It is acknowledged that free men are able and duty-bound to secure a free state. This is a natural state of being, into which God created ALL men.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This part is arguably less important than the first. If the men of a land insist on freedom, they will have it, though the rulers of the land may murder them for it. That non-infringement is enshrined in law only makes it easier, or perhaps possible, to remain free peacefully.
It seems fairly certain that one of the real purposes of WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the others, were to trick uncucked, patriotic, hard American men into dying so the cuck and traitor percentages could go up.
Let’s see these excrement connoisseurs try what they’ve been doing with Peace as the rule.
A fart from a sick cow locked in a balloon would be a better leader than Justine Castro.
I know there’s disagreement on it, but I tend to think we are able, and should, put away known sins, and stop doing them fairly permanently. The alternative is “nah, keep sinning, it’s all good! Plenty of grace to go around!”
This specific one wasn’t one that I do all the time, thankfully, but it is one that grew out of an area I’m quite weak and prone to failure in. Oh well. Just pray for grace at the end of the race, and strength to endure until then.
There is a concept that there are known, willful sins, and unknown incidental sins (which might still be quite serious). In the OT, the sacrifices at the temple were only for accidental sins, not known ones. I hope that the cross covered known sins, or I’m gonna have problems. It sounds like it does, but we still aught always be trying to put it away anyway.
Do we have an ultimate Pepe thread here? Because we should.
You are absolutely correct.
He made things to work a certain way. When we do things outside of that we can be allowed to suffer those consequences.
Voila!
What if it’s the soul that exists in a state of being beyond those parallel universes, and is the thing that moves between them?
We are talking about theoretical construction mechanisms of God’s creation. There is no need to switch to calling it satanism. “The chisel is just a tool of Satanists as it keeps us from using unhewn stones.”
Now if you want to question that Google has developed a super power that allows them to traverse the infinitum from the palms of their hands? By all means.
100% except for one word, “created”.
Think of it more as “shifts us all to”, and it becomes a lot more clear, especially as we say it almost daily here.
WWG1WGA.
What are the alternative explanations you refer to?
I don’t necessarily buy the article’s claim, but the parallel universes thesis seems pretty sound.
All you need is an Alamo in the background, or the Temple of Solomon.
It’s funny how universal that story is.
“Some accidents are more coincidental than others. It’d be a shame if you found out why.”
I got yer lightbulbs right here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It-Dux340fo