My feeling is the premise is flawed. AI isn't new.
The idea that it needs to be challenged or circumvented isn't plausible.
Trying to stop progress has proven a poor strategy through all human achievements and their upheaval throughout history.
Embrace it is the best bet.
Accept that all banking, tech and service jobs will disappear in the future. Even law enforcement, lawyers and judges will become an automated system in an AI future. But in an AI future non violent laws will cease to exist. There will be AI safeguards to stop the act before it happens.
Learn to code is a short term strategy.
Learn to farm, build, or otherwise serve the machine is the best bet. Any task that requires inspiration or invention will be highly valued but the process of innovation will then be captured and made repeatable.
Ideas will no longer have value without real world application like art. Those highly paid strategists and consultants will be replaced by a machine learning engine.
It will be like the episode of Star Trek where the two planets religated their wars to computers and then casualties were shuffled into suicide machines to feed the beasts thirsts.
Seems pretty happy no?
Some Anons don't know they are Anons.
It's the comments in the street that are the most surprising and from every reach of life.
I stopped in a small town gas stop with a bakery and the five older ladies all started on the state of things.
Stew Peter's was always controlled op in my mind. He's the only one with the over the top stuff and the 'died suddenly' film mixed in crazy stuff to discredit the actual doctors showing actual outcomes.
The clowns work as hard as possible to create false narratives to discredit the true ones.
Yes the greatest travesty is that in India everyone can afford help to maintain a home and that the quality of life for an educated person is higher there than in North America.
Smart people have to fix their own stuff In Canada otherwise they are bankrupted by the expenses.
There's no money left to send home for those with no physical skills.
This is kind of like the term "Fake News" that in late 2016 was drummed up by the major media to discredit the Podesta WikiLeaks exposure.
Trump took hold of it and labeled the mainstream media "Fake News" .
So Q and FBI Anon were dropping tidbits around the same time. The media needed a soundbite to discredit Q and so used the term "QAnon" to label folks with a pajorative.
This new term worked to identify the false flag "QAnon" operatives by the use of the term.
The "QAnon Shaman" was probably an operative. He worked with many shady folks like Alice Kennedy (pseudonym) and was a paid voice actor with an alias. The same could be said of his associate the "QAnon Hobbit" seen in many pictures with the "Shaman". The hobbit was also a voice actor on voices.com.
Seems that voice acting was a prerequisite of the operators.
I agree.
Everything that happened has a basis in the past.
Learning about the people who worked on these products is sometimes very informative
Upon request of Cohen van der Eb returned to the Netherlands in 1970 to start a research group in molecular biology of oncoviruses.[2] During this period Canadian post-doc Frank L. Graham joined his research group.[4] Together they worked on a technique to insert foreign DNA in cultured human cells. The technique of calcium phosphate transfection became available in 1973.[5][6][7] Fellow molecular biologist Piet Borst called this discovery of how to insert foreign DNA in human cells the cornerstone of genetics and cell biology.[3][8] In 1972 van der Eb obtained and managed to culture embryonic kidney cells from an aborted or miscarried human foetus.[9][10] With Graham's contributions in transfection of the cells with the adenovirus 5 this led to the cell line of HEK 293 cells.[4][11] HEK 293 became one of the most used cell lines worldwide, coming close to the use of the HeLa cell line.[9] In 1974 van der Eb and Graham demonstrated that loose virus DNA could cause cancer.[5]
You should read into the creator of the Hek line. Still living today...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex_van_der_Eb
His specialty is viral tumor research.
His research can be said to have enhanced modern pharma understanding of the cause and effect of tumors with a viral vector.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEK_293_cells
The SV40 mutation exists as part of the critical Hek 293 cells. Read more above.
https://enhancingbrain.com/what-is-the-average-iq-of-an-ivy-league-student/
What Is the Average I.Q. Of An Ivy League Student? The average I.Q. of an Ivy League student is 104, according to a recent study.
If I the article the average high IQ was 127, the average being 104, means an equal population of the students fall into 81-104 range.
According to this article an IQ of 85 or lower is considered retarded: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-jun-21-sci-mental21-story.html
So in Ivy League schools about 4.6% of students could be considered retarded.
Also test NFC - lots of apps for that on Android.
How NFC works is to send electricity out to a dormant NFC device, and the device uses that power to respond to the request. This is why Bluetooth is seeing the signal as undefined.
I bet NFC will see something.
You should test NFC. NFC responds to powered signals from NFC to enable a powered identity in an NFC entity. I assume the technogy would be self or responsive powered generated identity to create a unique identity that can be scanned through an NFC signal.
https://dangerousthings.com/product/xnt/
The idea being that the jab would put in place the ability to enable a digital identity from a local unique digital id that would act like this NFC device. The jab creates a powered identity like an NFC chip from the nanoparticle distribution in your body - basically a digital fingerprint.
And why they were so adamant that everyone especially the children get the shot. A trackable identity with no physical connection would please the 3letters and China very much.
I once argued with someone over a report for an hour.
The report was on a reporting period of 1 month.
The data in that report changes over time for specific period (the one month report references a point in time where data can change as new data is added to reconciled transactions)
I gave up after that hour because I realized no matter how I explained it the concept of a report for a period having changing data because of later reconciliation was impossible for them to understand
I should have asked them the breakfast question.