The original models, to show warming over time, had to collect heat in the upper armosphere. Essentially, there is a "lid" in the models that only let a static amount of heat through (the calculated energy budget of our heat loss to space is generally use as this lid) which is how we "warmed".
Newer models get more creative, hiding heat in the oceans and such.
I wasn't saying you did, i was just spring boarding from your assumption. To clarify: Even if we assumed the earth was warming, global warming to death only works if you assume the atmosphere is a relatively never-ending sponge of heat.
But in order for that to happen, each molecule in the atmosphere would have to be isolated from all other molecules so that they were only taking in and putting out energy in what amounts to an atomic sun.
In the real world, convection is how our atmosphere sheds heat. The sun shines and does a little bit of heating of the atmosphere on the way in, then warms the surface, which then convectively warms the atmosphere adjacent to it. This atmosphere then warms the layer above it, and then above it, and so forth until the very top of the atmosphere strains against gravity to shed it's energy and then falls back.
In any convective system, if you introduce more heat, the convection speeds up and the convective envelope expands. The medium tends to return to its equilibrium energy state, which means temperature would remain relatively stable - especially for a system that swings from -40 to 40 during the year, an "average increase" of 1-2 degrees wouldn't be noticed by the system or its inhabitants.
The equilibrium energy state of the medium only "gets hotter" if the medium is overwhelmed by heat and cannot expand.
Now, if we assume the 80 degress range is absolute and assume the Karman line at 100km is an atmospheric cliff into outer space, a 2 degree change would result in a 0.025 percent volumetric expansion of the atmosphere. The 100km line would need to be able to expand to approximately 100.5km (assuming a static density for the atmosphere to 100km and only changing temperature - obviously angross overestimate innthe real world).
Since its a gas with no boundaries and the earth already has an exosphere that extends as much as 10,000km from the surface, i would assume this isn't a big deal to the entire system- IF it's happening, which is also a point that hasn't been adequately demonstrated without statistically fudging the numbers.
Radiative physics used instead of convective physics is what this whole global warming sham is based on. Its why its close at the broad stroke level but no where near reality at the detail level.
They won't. They'll have never learned to use the tools to save their lives abd will be killed by the criminals.
Its because they keep changing the test parameters to get more people under the umbrella of "needing medicine we've already patented" and not an actual food issue.
There ARE food issues, but ive watched them walk this line back for 20 years and then create a whole new line "pre-diabeetus" to grab even more sales. This one is all on pharma.
But, those poor military aged men with no families are just looking for a better life!
All of the original requests of labor unions were fulfilled by regulation, except higher wages (which is a constant concern when you are living paycheck to paycheck).
A business does not have unlimited funds unless its hooked into the globalist network. They were making 9-13 dollars an hour plus medical benefits (plus the employer's share od wage taxes) to dispense a drink worth about 50 cents.
How much more do they think the coffee can cost?
My experience is a similar amount of time rooting out the bad levels of management.
People have a tendancy to say people fucked their way to the top or are the brother/friend/naked hammer boyfriend of the management directly above them because they aren't great in their current positions.
It happens, but its far from as common as people make it out to be. It's a convenient lie for people to buy into, like a child saying their parents hate them and thats why they have a bedtime. It's not untrue, but ita not the truth for the most.
In my experience.
Ive been in situations where i get put in charge of people who i dont have an i kling of their work. You learn.
The nepotism management position is a fantasy that people enjoy because it means they might luck pit and get a cushy job like it someday. Very few are failing where they knew someone and got the job that way.
Most are where they are via the principle of promotion until you no longer stand out and lack of accountability for their position by their own management.
This is a balancing act. The larger an organization gets, the more support your operations group (whoever makes the money) needs to be most efficient.
You see a lot of businesses crash and burn because they just lump everything on the front line worker/first level management in a bid to keep "lean" and impress short term money goals. In the long run, you burn out your employees who move on and the company suffers from brain drain over a 3-5 year time span.
Where companies fail is by having middle managers who are missing either accountability or authority (and sometimes both). If a manager has to ask a boss for every little thing - or if their performance on indicators useful to their position are not reviewed - they are cuttable. [Note: Outside of a training situation for 6 months or so, such as when promoting a good worker to the next level]
That was me, and I am now wrong. This changes everything in regards to state vs federal banking charters.
North Dakota has a unqiue state bank that pre-existed the federal bank and thus was grandfathered i to all of the federal rules to flow its chartered mandate.
Except that the state-charted banks still have to follow the federal rules.
Its not a dual banking system, its a federal banking system where states can add laws to follow in their own states.
Most states just use it to define "abandoned " accounts and take the money in them. Theoretically, the states could protect their citizens from national bank abuses, but thats not common.
Does anyoke have a link to the document with the instructions?
They take 12.4% of your wages for your working years and then give you less than the federal poverty level back.
Assuming an average lifetime earning potential of about 2.25m (50k x 45years 20-65), that means you individually should have a "bank" of about $279,000 at 65 with no investment or growth whatsoever. At roughly 1,500 per month, they are rationing your pay for 15.5 years of "retirement".
Basically, they are paying you just enough to rent a one bedroom apartment in Bedbugville so that you die early enough that they can run away with the proceeds of your lifetime of working.
Oh, and they tax it. And they charge you for medicare.
Oh, and if you need to go to an old folks' home, this is what they pay them to house, feed, medicate, clean, and care for you - which is why it always seems to be two nurses to 712 patients.
I honestly didn't know Harry Browne, but Jo Jorgenson always came off like a grifter. If elected through some miracle, i expected a Ukranian buyout day one and we'd get a Democrat president.
The Libertarian party is run by the uniparty. The only people i know that were in the party (a long time ago) were progressives, except they wanted legal pot.
These are databases of people who dare challenge the NWO's climate scam goals.
Arts and crafts can't really replace home care and textiles.
There are always considerations.
But this is the trend. If you want to solve a problem, you can't ignore why it exists in the first place.
Its because women stopped contributing beyond the children.
Back in the 17 and 1800s, the wives would be at home tending to home affairs - sewing, laundry washing, food preparation, cleaning, and so forth. A man would come home from soul crushing back breaking labor and his wife would be soul crushed and back broken, also.
Since the 1910s or so, the work of maintaining a home has steadily shrunk. You no longer make your own clothes, no longer have to spend all day making a meal, no longer have to scrub laundry on a board.
Including children, it takes about 3-4 hours a day to tend the house. Without children it can probably be done in one.
And when the man gets home, it's all drama. Fix dinner some days each week.Then it's fix the appliances. Tend the yard on the weekend. You, know, the "man's work". None of that was taken over to keep the house running smoothly.
Boys turning to men get tired of providing it all and getting nothing out of it. Especially if there is financial hardship from having a single income.
Girls ruined the boys that became men for themselves when they became women.
The pay is the key. If you need a union, hire them in, pay them what their ask is and then stop paying them. None of this "the union should exist forever" nonsense.
Half is more than I was expecting. I was thinking that theyd exclude the texas stores.
Now we arent selling pride stuff 'in all stores'!
How many died in the 80s-10s from illegal immigration? How many are dying now?
How many innocents died in Vietnam? Korea? Europe? The Southern reconstruction? The civil war? The Indian wars? The Revolution? The take down of prey in prehistory?
"Not even one." is an impossible standard, and one absolutely never reached - ever - in the history of man kind. Even Jesus warned that He was the sword and that converting could mean the death of your loved ones or even your death at the hands of your loved ones.
It sucks. It is the worst when its the ones you love. No one celebrates this loss and no fight is innocent. But no good comes to the fore without the fight.
Remember the message on the Georgia Guidestones. 500 million people. Fifteen of every sixteen people dead. This is the grand plan, the alternative.
This is why we must fight, despite the costs. This is why the roots need to go with it.