Just because it isn't peer reviewed doesn't mean it isn't valid, it's not what I'm saying. Peer reviewing means the experiment has been run by other scientists and they've arrived at the same consensus which obviously strengthens the legitimacy of the study.
He's not humble? Have you watched his broadcast in the last 5 years? He's amped up sure, but he never claims to be beyond that which he is. Doesn't claim to be some prophet or IDK some shadow government figure with an alphabet symbol that cryptically tries to predict things for years in the future and never reveals themselves. See how easy it is to straw-man something?
FYI I don't think Q is a charlatan, I also don't think AJ is. They both seem to not like the other but they both serve purposes. But AJ is one of the OGs, show some damn respect.
Attached in the post title is the PDF from the DOJ showing Chinese state-run "China Daily" publication and their balance sheets in regards to dealings with LA Times, Time Magazine, Seattle Times, Chicago Tribune etc. It shows each amount paid and for what purpose.
Here is a link to one of the time's partnered propaganda pieces https://partners.time.com/partners/china-daily/making-sense-of-the-new-5-year-plan/?prx_t=azIGATi5IAbBkRA&utm_campaign=159028
Here is the article published from The Daily Wire on the subject https://www.dailywire.com/news/china-state-run-media-paying-american-news-outlets-millions-to-publish-propaganda
Careful on glorifying Q as a quasi-messianic figure. The stuff here is definitely eye opening and interesting but don't become religious with Q. They/he isn't our savior, Jesus is. Just try to keep that at the forefront. I get the correlation though because I definitely believe this battle has a spiritual element as well friend.