Precious metals, Trump's a billionare (He'd know) the shorthand is just "bullion".
I remember him saying it a few times, there was a certain nuance to it like he knew he was deliberately perking pede's ears up
Who is going to dare try that now with Trump? Obviously this is a win, now they have to do fraud to circumvent the bill.
I wonder what China will do instead of just leaving it for nothing. Maybe arm Panama to a limited degree?
If something technical is happening with the core (opened up) I bet even a fire extiguisher popping in the worst spot could be bad news.
Russia has zaporoshia (sic.) and it's been deactivated long ago.
But what plant(s) are there for them to use? I havent heard of a single attack by russia on a nuclear plant (other than the captured one)
They're obviously doing this for illegal reasons, still.
The criminal high-brass will be their customers.
Liberals are always more miserable and that is PROVEN to make you look worse.
Anyone who hates their life for a good chunk of their life is gonna end up looking rancid.
It was an accomplishment they did this in 18 months. And its smaller than others, I think development is just soo slow
Machine superintelligence will be the single greatest invention mankind has made since FIRE!
It's power will transform every facet of life, nothing will be left untouched by it. Very little will be the same after it is born.
It'll be so significant that a new era will be named: "Pre-AI" and "Post-AI", we right now are still in the "Pre-AI" era but that is soon coming to an end.
I'm so excited that I will live to see the dawn of machine superintelligence, to be able to speak to one will be an untold privelege. Somthing only sci-fi could conjure up is quickly becoming a reality.
Itd be a tragedy if we stopped ourselves here, when a technological revolution is within our lifetimes!
I think the magnetic field around earth is due to its molten core spinning. Its why the magnetic poles match the rotation poles. I think if energy is siphoned off of this field that it can only contribute to slowing the earths rotation. And that doesnt come back.
No device small enough to fit on earth could harvest anything off the field. The field direction and strength is the same for even a city sized object (think compass). You need differences (a high ball rolling to a low valley) to harvest energy
Its moreso harvesting the earth's rotation through magnetism than the magnetism being harvested itself.
The scientists dont control where the money goes (corruption could be all throughout it), and these reactors are suuuch a complicated feat of engineering that ITER (the largest experimental fusion reactor worldwide, under construction) has atleast a hundred PhD's chugging at it. And its still progressing slowly.
Superconductors arent new. CERN's been using them in their particle accelerator. Proven largescale engineering feat, not only labscale. It needs liquid helium which is realllllly expensive.
What IS new and IS labscale is superconducting material (under very high pressure). The temperture it needs is only with liquid nitrogen, waaay cheaper. But the high pressure is impossible to have anything useful yet. Only labscale.
Life on earth is possible because of FUSION from the sun. Just like with birds and flying: we can see it, so it can be done.
We cant make energy out of nothing it has to come out of somewhere, solar from the sun. And gas is packed full of energy we harvest.
For reasons we cannot harvest the magnetic field of the earth. BUT the easiest reason is that if (if) we could we be stealing from the magnetic barrier that shields the earth from charged particles from the sun.
For more technical reasons we cant, but IF we could, we'd weaken the shield and smaller solar flares could get through and fry satellites and ground electronics maybe.
Not "never" a way, but a long ways off. Superconducting loops already house currents which are permanently in motion without loss.
Theyre seen in tokomak reactors. Today they require supercold temps, but evidence is suggesting it can be done without it eventually.
Loooong way off, we'll have fusion power well before then and the storage issue wont matter
Larger generators are actually more efficient
Locomotives I think have trouble linking mech energy from the engine to the wheels. Diesel electric is more flexible that way.
And less clunking parts in diesel-electric makes subs quieter. But nuclear is better for that
Im also guessing "transmitting" gas via truck causes less losses per unit energy than transmission losses over cables.
All I know is theres big starch carbohydrates and small sugar ones and that the big ones "burn" slower. I didnt know the speed ranking of the sugars but surely moderate big starches for long energy and moderate sugar for short energy is best. Fruity sugar or refined, a 3000 calorie/day diet will pork anyone but the fittest, biggest people.
And imo "basic biochemistry" is an oxymoron haha
When I read "and the rest of America's children" I see an emotional appeal. We ALL are poisoned by Krafts shit. Good anti-processed food opinion, but BAD emotional arguement.
Biological chemistry, we all use glucose. Whereever its dervied, too much sugar is fattening. Sugar itself is addictive and its an eating disorder if you have that addiction. I wont look up if HFSC is actually more addictive than sugar, but its certainly cheap+in everything, so its a shitter additive definetly.
Parasite-this parasite-that.
Isolate the parasite and name it to us. That it looks like a demon doesn't matter. Even our own microscopic cells can look strange.
Living beings emitting radiowaves is utter bullshit.
Billionares have probably cancelled much bigger events over much smaller bullshit.
If diaper don was true the deepstate enemy wouldve unleashed that on him already.
This is the endgame, unfounded ad hominem propaganda is very weak
-
Yep
-
Tactical nukes can be small, theyre ment to act as a missle barrage but with the impact (and hassle to coordinate) of only one strike. And nuclear power plants(or a LNG ones, honsetly) are worthwhile targets. But still that would begin ww3...
3.. The actual molten uranium of chernobyl mostly sank into the basement (elephants foot), but the true danger emerged when the steam explosion released tiny fuel particles. A powerful enough bomb on inactive (still potent) uranium can cause a chernobyl event.
The Miller-Urey experiment in 1953 proved that water, ammonia, methane and hydrogen can form amino acids (the building block of life) when subjected to electric shocks. Thats some proof we use showing that life can come from non-life. And creationism is non-science, carbon date an early man's bone and he'll surpass the supposed years age of the universe.
Gene engineering is a pretty transparent example of scientific supremacy. We know that what makes us US is our DNA (not a warm sunbeam) and it can be tinkered with artificially.
As a "great awakening" guy, the truth about how the world works is more important than how rightous I feel. And its extremely important in science to be able to answer questions with "I don't know" instead of offloading it to the divine. Thats ignorance.
Oh yea, and didn't the "act of god" defence get thrown out of court, permanently? Yes, because you nothing unprovable can fly there.
I would be careful with this. There would'nt be any way to tell if your exposing yourself to too much of it until it's too late. So maybe start at 5% and increment by 5% until whatever happens.