There are a lot of base af lgbt folks - they just already have dealt with a lot of fear from actions and threats from homophobes and insecure people, so the last thing most want is to speak out against folks who have been their Allie’s and accepted them.
Little do they realize, that acceptance provided by many on the left is shallow af and manipulative.
Thankfully, as with everything, shit will get bad enough/dark enough first but then people will speak out
I agree - this doc is a bunch of fluff aimed at making money off of our echo chamber and cognitive dissonance.
On a personal note - I also think dinesh is a hack/bobblehead and hate seeing him use this movie as a grift to get some money off of otherwise decent folks.
The problem with 2000 Mules is dinesh is a talking head partisan hack grifter at best. Don’t fall for the echo chamber / confirmation bias bullshit he is tying himself to. All it takes is watching some of his vids of him arguing with college students to see his game is no different than libs - attempt to paint someone in a corner and use “clever” arguing tactics vs be genuine and honest and factual. I can’t stand this guy and I’m disappointed how many folks on gaw have fell for his garbage just cuz he’s saying shit we agree with.
Need an actual argument aside from my rambling? It’s $20 for the movie.
I’ll take bases pillow guy any day. Dinesh is bad for “us” though.
Inb4 the shills
Simile boat my friend and time is ticking as I’m 38 and my wife isn’t far behind me. I don’t want to mention it to her because she is the type who will become consumed easy if leadership (me) wavers at all - but I do have some serious concerns, I also know folks like us having kids is the only possible way to reversing all of this if DS gets toppled even a little bit.
Scary times and I wish I could just go back to how my mind was a few years back when this was all just an occasional conspiracy musing vs being reality. I’m not a big prayer/religious person, but I fuckin pray to whatever is out there that Q team or whoever are real and succeed.
Not sure your point of quoting declaration?
Also, maybe I read the next part wrong but we’re you saying You see states rights as compromising with the left?
Yep that’s exactly what hot button issues are - nothing useful will be done. Just like the race card - no one is willing to try and solve the situation, cuz it’s too valuable to play when voting time comes around.
Yeah similar thoughts as well that this was not a right wing leak - and if it was, then rinos.
Too many folks were questioning across party lines what’s going on with disinfo dept and Ukraine and hunter and economy - they needed a distraction.
Your comparing apples to arbys brisket sandwich there bruh
To touch on abortion… One’s own personal feelings/beliefs do not suddenly make something ultimately right or wrong. That type of thinking is the flaw with liberals, and sadly, with fundamentalists as well.
The right/best thing to do is what’s being done, which is stated rights. Want to be a cum dumpster and not be responsible for what happens? Well then get on birth control or live in a state that allows abortion.
My primary point however - look at the times when abortion has been raised in mainstream media. There is a direct correlation to there being either an election looming or some major events that both parties voters were agreeing on occurring. Currently, that would be the Ukraine situation and hunters laptop - but now, voila, distraction with abortion and suddenly we have division again.
Personally dgaf for most part about the abortion issue - just a hot button topic of a dead horse that gets best every time the party lines blur and we need devisively pitted against one another again
But
That shit was hilarious hearing him call these hypocrites out
Oh sweetie, it’s cute that you seem to think like the lefties do that the problem is simply the /other/ peoples party.
Clearly you’re new here or haven’t been paying attention if you think this is all “the democrats” fault. Inb4 “well it’s MOSTLY their fault” or some other dumb shit. Inb4 some dumb shit tie in to revelations to try and support that it’s all the democrats
Lmao sad that sooooo many of you visiting a site called “great awakening” but still are half asleep.
I agree - it costs , so I won’t see it either, let alone folks who don’t believe.
This honestly stinks of a cash grab. I imagine it’s just a super cut off all the stuff we’ve seen already peppered with commentary and such from people, in my opinion who are disingenuous (eider, desiuza, etc)
People who are a part of what I see to be “the old guard” version of the gop. People who may as well be cia assets or DS aligned Aka money driven. Mike Lindell I believed cuz like trump he was a business man getting involved in politics whereas these guys are political men turning demagoguery into business/profits.
Inb4 some have trouble with this concept cuz they still haven’t woke up to their own echo chambers and cognitive dissonance.
Trust trump. Trust sessions. Trust Durham. Trust Flynn. Trust Q. And even then, question then all the way. But these demagogue propaganda political talking heads types- I don’t trust an bit. Mockingbird comes to mind.
Jfc is it that difficult for gaw to call bullshit when they see it?
Clearly this is playing rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrright fucking into what the stereotypical “Qanon conspiracy theorist” cliche wants to hear.
Do I have proof? No. Just connect the dots. Zero fuckin legit intel on any new/major points in this video.
Please use your valuable time on researching anything else. I’m going back to poal ffs, you gaw folk are morons.
New Testament literally must be taken with a grain of salt purely due to the fact it was pieces together by what were effectively “deep state” politicians.
The gospels are the part that is most important and can be taken with less salt because there is so much more corroboration. However, you’re stuck on John - but go look what the others say he said.
Again, like liberals - instead of “trust the science” and backing fauci, you’re choosing Johns word over the other three combined and contrasted. But hey, to be fair, as with liberals, if you questioned things and applied critical thinking and objectivity then your narrative bubble would collapse.
I’m still waiting on the explanation for Revelations explicitly mentioning that it applies to their generations and their time (at the time of writing) as well as waiting on you to read the other gospels.
Funny thing is you’re possibly feeling smug and such when posting your quotes (again, liberal …). Ultimately you do you tho, by default you are on the right team and that’s all that matters.
New agey modern liberal type arguments of saying “well this is the tool you are using to prove your side” - cute, thanks for affirming my point further than fundies are effectively liberals.
Because we all know why and when they use those tactics of saying “that’s just gaslighting” or in your example “poisining the well” - right? It’s when they are wrong and unable to defend their feelings/side because it hits a point where they can’t because their entire logic and belief was based on emotion vs logic of any kind.
It’s not rocket science - and in spiritual things it is almost simpler than ideological things, which kinda points to fundies being even lower on the food chain than liberals. ALMOST. I’ll be critical and mean even, but not that mean ;)
This is basic (granted, archaic) MSM bullshit - the New Testament. So while we get one story on Fox, another on CNN, another on OANN and another from internet journos/anons - what does one do? Believe all four as “gospel”? Believe just one and make it our own narrative based on feelings?
I’m sure you know the answer - take each with a grain of salt and apply critical thinking to any common threads, right?
So I do believe christs story and words - but I don’t hinge on just one specific quote as the crux of what I believe, and I find a lot of people do (the John quote above perhaps for example). As with the msm narrative, is the picking and choosing that quote based on feelings? What do the other gospels say in their version of those quotes? What is the common thread among the “editorializing”, if you will?
I believe Christ is “a” way, perhaps the most simple/effective way, but not the only way however.
Again, no qualms with Christ, no qualms with the Bible, but I do take issue with fundamentalists - again, cuz they’re effectively liberals. In the MSM example, fundamentalists are the sheep that keep the great lie moving and thus many from finding the truth. And about as equally annoying to deal with due to the massive ego involved.
Nope, problem is legit with fundamentalist. Fundamentalist are a bunch of waterhead baby types (or liberals in reverse if you will) who think that not only for certain was the Bible written for and speaking specifically to their time and timeline, but also that it is meant to be taken literally word for word.
I’m guessing i struck a chord because you are one of the maniacal modern sects of Christianiaty (modern meaning formed in the last two hundred years by self proclaimed prophets … you know, Mormons, Pentecostals, etc
Bhsljhheehahd djhagghssheeb llllppffffltttbvmbvshwyjkalfpb ^ the above was me translating some speaking in tongues I just had into txt, it says that all u r said is inspired by Jesus and and for sure is his word. You believe jon of potmos apparently with absolutely zero reason to when he says that, so no reason you shouldn’t believe me.
I think it means something different to people incapable of critical thought and prone to cognitive dissonance - which is a part of fundamentalist thought.
Again, similar to brainwashed lefties.
So while no, I do not believ Christ is explicitly the Only true god (REEEEEEE!!!!) due to context of the time it made sense for him to be expressing however, as an extension of god incarnate, to push that there is only one true god because at the time that is what the fight was. The things your mentioning, for whatever reason, you and other fundamentalist believe apply 1:1 to today and that the translations are all accurate and all intended to be taken without any grains of salt.
However, the good thing about even that fundamentalist nutjob mindset is that it can and does refine the process of helping people become better Nd try for more and live better lives closer to god and goodness so they are better equipped for whatever the afterlife holds.
I believe in god - but I believe all roads lead to Rome. Only people who explicitly deny Christ and do so as a snub at god have anything to worry about. The rest of us will come out the other end fine.
Again, not corroborated gospel.
And please see my original comment, specifically about idiot fundamentalist defaulting to just throwing New Testament quotes similar to leftists throwing dumbass quotes from “experts” instead of using actual thought and critical thinking
Again,- not Christs words. The same way leftists cling to their ideological narrative, fundamentalist Christian’s cling to their narratives and stories vs the actual root of it all.
Sorry, I listen to the few words Christ and god said in the Bible and the few stories that can be corroborated. I care not for stories and letters mere mortal men have written, regardless of if they are canon or not.
And cheesus seems like a funny name and concept. Is it a Jesus made of cheese? A Jesus tk cheeses? Is it a cheese Jesus made as a savior to fellow cheese? Is it a Jesus about being “cheesy”? Very few things in life should be taken serious - lighten up and learn to enjoy life and laugh at the eternal joke it is.
But I’m sure I’m satanic or something cuz I don’t cling to the whole “don’t question or laugh at any of this” type stuff that was conveneitaly put into the New Testament by a council of policital leaders, right? Lmao
Oh sheep, you are awake only recently… but thankfully you are.
https://imgur.com/a/J22HBR7
Correct^^