525
Comments (37)
sorted by:
36
SJBHamilton 36 points ago +36 / -0

"Oh, but those ballot drops were just done by kind people volunteering to deliver ballots for the sick and disabled!"

NO.

Cops use cell phone data all the time to build their cases against criminals.

17
JeremiahKassin 17 points ago +17 / -0

If that were the case, there needed to be solid chain of custody on those ballots. There isn't.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

No there doesn't need to be a chain of custody established. The very fact that people were stuffing multiple ballots -any multiple ballots - into a box 25 times a day, then turning around and peeling off the latex gloves they had on and dropping them in a conveniently-placed trash barrel is more than enough to charge them with a crime. Because that alone is a crime. Wake up!

2
JeremiahKassin 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm agreeing with you. I'm saying if these people were voting for relatives or friends, they need to be able to identify exactly who they were submitting the votes for and why. They can't do that, and that's therefore proof enough of a crime.

12
Spiridon915 12 points ago +12 / -0

You always deliver ballots for the sick and disabled in the middle of the night.

10
djmarcone 10 points ago +10 / -0

wearing gloves. and taking pictures of the box. And looking around furtively.

5
GodWins_76 5 points ago +5 / -0

1:45 am is the most popular time to vote, don't ya know...

7
MegaMAGAMichiPede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah their spouse or adult child with power of attorney can deliver ONE ballot for a disabled loved one, not backpacks full! Lol

1
OffGridGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you noticed many cops investigating these criminals? If they're not, who are they actually working for?

17
AngelCole 17 points ago +17 / -0

Wtf would they be tracking the president's entourage at Mar-A-Lago? It's a rhetorical question, I know exactly why they would do this. Damn demons.😡

10
Libraritarian 10 points ago +10 / -0

And why was it news that they were outside for an hour?

7
ILearnedToCode 7 points ago +7 / -0

"wheres our snipers?"

7
summerstormAK 7 points ago +7 / -0

To help us prove a point.

10
Scorpion76 10 points ago +10 / -0

So I guess many of the driverless cars will just about be on the highway, in any lane huh.

10
COLNE68601 10 points ago +10 / -0

If it's close enough to find a Starbucks, it's close enough to prosecute for ballot trafficking. Especially in cases where there is video evidence.

10
penisse 10 points ago +10 / -0

How do these « journalists » know better than the professional from the movie with a 40-year long experience?

4
Rubieroo 4 points ago +4 / -0

And how do they think the map app on their own phones manage to mysteriously pinpoint their exact location in order to give them directions?

7
lsvogel 7 points ago +7 / -0

And so it was accurate enough for FBI on Jan 6th planned assault on Trump supporters, but not their paid thugs.

5
SBDAmerican 5 points ago +5 / -0

"These people are stupid."

3
GoGoOptomistic 3 points ago +3 / -0

That and they think everyone else is ...

5
Mad_Maximo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Geotracking is used in your GPS.

"Not accurate" essentially says to expect to never get to your destination with GPS.

That's how bad of a lie this shit is.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
MeanOMan 4 points ago +7 / -3

Everyone... geo location is done in floating decimal points and the precision of that number is very accurate...

here is where inaccuracy comes into play... storing of each point in time...

Depending on how often this device is recorded, some software tries to calculate points in time using trajectory and other mathematical formulas. These formulas and algorithms can be a bit hit and miss.

Here is what is deadly accurate. Non-estimated point in time records that get saved.

Don't let them steal the narrative by comparing evidence used in 2000 mules with everyday use of that technology like google maps.

2
SixTeaNine 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCADA systems and IOT have been managing high volume, precision time-series data like this for years. It is nothing new.

1
RedNonna 1 point ago +1 / -0

The videos appear to be deadly accurate.

-2
MeanOMan -2 points ago +1 / -3

A lot companies will actually round the geo numbers down to make them easier to compute. Do you want accuracy to area of 5 feet, 1 ft, etc..

4
LastConservativeInCA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everyone knows that cell phone tracking isn't accurate enough for pinpointing a ballot mule's location, but if someone in Trump's entourage is carrying a Russian YotaPhone, then it's plenty accurate.

4
Dudeman1717 4 points ago +4 / -0

I figured this out when I opened Google Maps, from my "invisible" computer and it pinpointed me within 25 feet. Not always, but more frequent than not.

4
jasqid 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hell, my phone can even show me which way I am facing/looking. But that is not accurate enough for Mule/Election fraud tracking. But Jan 6 MAGA "terrorist" we can use that data! REEEEEEEE!

4
Ogcarvattack 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you havent seen "enemy of the state" i suggest you do so

3
ThePowerOfPrayer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's the screenshot-

https://files.catbox.moe/3l0pb2.jpg

3
morum 3 points ago +3 / -0

omg it works if it is entirely unscrutinized, just like " the science " stop being mean and let us own your soul REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

3
GoingCamaro 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have used cell phone tracking to save lives. It's very accurate.

2
Fefifofumdrum 2 points ago +2 / -0

So what about those boxes with video evidence that those mules were actually there?

Next question: how does the GPS on your phone know where you are if the geolocation isn't accurate?

These people are stupid.

2
Godisgloryy 2 points ago +2 / -0

They (evils) have an answer for everything, but not for long. Our Lord Jesus Christ is going to take care of them. Soon or late they have to face him.

1
Suzeq2018 1 point ago +1 / -0

interesting that there's a mirrored 17..."7:10 a.m"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Senators, Congressmen - someone have some courage and introduce some legislation to charge these people with a crime! We need a Special Prosecutor ASAP.

0
Cheesus 0 points ago +1 / -1

The problem with 2000 Mules is dinesh is a talking head partisan hack grifter at best. Don’t fall for the echo chamber / confirmation bias bullshit he is tying himself to. All it takes is watching some of his vids of him arguing with college students to see his game is no different than libs - attempt to paint someone in a corner and use “clever” arguing tactics vs be genuine and honest and factual. I can’t stand this guy and I’m disappointed how many folks on gaw have fell for his garbage just cuz he’s saying shit we agree with.

Need an actual argument aside from my rambling? It’s $20 for the movie.

I’ll take bases pillow guy any day. Dinesh is bad for “us” though.

Inb4 the shills