I think this can happen in the conspiracy theory community as well. Lets say that someone found evidence that Q was an operation to quench the thirst of rebellion. No matter how compelling the evidence may be, many people here will stick with Q and think that it's only shills saying this. People can get caught in their ways on both sides of the aisle.
CNN acting like every politician isn't like this. Clearly they're throwing the ball to Trump. We should always be skeptical. Is that because Trump is good or because he's just another left right stomp towards whatever the deepstate goals are?
I'm not pro Kamala by any means, but I found the comparison picture of her wearing the earpiece to be misleading. In the comparison photo, the girl wearing the NOVA H1 Audio Earrings is wearing something else on her ear that isn't the Audio Earrings. What Kamala was wearing looked a lot like the other set of earrings the example photo was wearing. Kamala for sure also had something on her ear that looked like it could be the audio earrings, but the loop earrings that the comparison photo showed aren't the audio earrings if that makes sense.
This very well could have happened, but I also feel that this is a bit of conspiracy theorist contrarianism. A bunch of normies were willing to accept that he was murdered rather than committed suicide, so of course conspiracy guys have to take it a step further beyond normies' willingness to accept something just to feel more controversial than them. The conspiracy theorist in us all naturally has an instinct to say "normies can't have it right, it must be one step beyond their understanding". That isn't necessarily the case when the evidence is clear of foul play in Epstein's situation. I'm not dismissing that him being escaped could have happened, but it doesn't really matter either way. In both cases, there's an outside entity that wants him dead or outside of prison to shut him up. That's the important thing that we and normies were able to agree on that day.