Fair enough
Here is a Local news report of the incident with some video.
Juvenile thugs causing a riot and setting off fireworks in the mall. Business owner say they do this every where during the New Year and it's best to just pack up and leave.
https://x.com/MiamiPDScanner/status/1743051503139516464
You can listen to all of the archived dispatch starting here:
Call came out as “security unable to hold the crowd. Large group fighting. Knife seen. Margaritaville”
Listen here starting at on screen timecode 20:26:53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4au0YR7ypw0
Seeing as there was a post here a few days ago about a plan in 2024 to use military planes in UFO holograms to scare people into a one world government
https://nitter.net/JoshWhoX/status/1696924935296368725
I suspect this is all a test for a new planned psyop.
Yeah its a lot of conjecture.
Some people ate claiming that there is footage out there somewhere but I haven't seen it.
I'm seeing this on my Twitter feed. Rumors of 8-10 ft creatures but haven't sseen any video so far.
https://x.com/chhardman/status/1743082580902400350
Miami mall incident involving 8-10 ft tall creatures?
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/454100520
The video shows a MASSIVE police response People allegedly were being attacked by 7-10 foot tall creatures and shooting at them The airspace was completely shut down and only police helos were flying Check out the video, you can indeed hear gunshots
https://twitter.com/euphorio_/status/1743087854568477057
Here are the only 2 news articles that come up in a search. This happened on January 1.
https://crisis24.garda.com/alerts/2024/01/us-police-activity-ongoing-near-bayside-marketplace-in-miami-fla-late-jan-1-in-response-to-crowd-disturbance https://countylocalnews.com/article1/2024/01/02/massive-police-response-underway-at-bayside-market-place-in-miami-florida/
Miami aliens eating people?
If this was a little higher resolution, it would be much easier to share the clip with others.
I found the whole doc and sent it to some family but they'll usually scoff it off when they see something that is an hour or more
Thank you! It has been very helpful waking up people near me. I show them the doc and then afterward they want to know more so I send them all the zip files. So far I've even gotten the most liberal people I know to look more into it.
They are such huge parts of the market that it would still affect everyones retirement but that would help out a lot if they get a taste of their own medicine and have the govt used against them.
§ 9-328. PRIORITY OF SECURITY INTERESTS IN INVESTMENT PROPERTY.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/9/9-328
The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same investment property:
(1) A security interest held by a secured party having control of investment property under Section 9-106 has priority over a security interest held by a secured party that does not have control of the investment property.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), conflicting security interests held by secured parties each of which has control under Section 9-106 rank according to priority in time of:
(A) if the collateral is a security, obtaining control;
(B) if the collateral is a security entitlement carried in a securities account and:
(i) if the secured party obtained control under Section 8-106(d)(1), the secured party's becoming the person for which the securities account is maintained;
(ii) if the secured party obtained control under Section 8-106(d)(2), the securities intermediary's agreement to comply with the secured party's entitlement orders with respect to security entitlements carried or to be carried in the securities account; or
(iii) if the secured party obtained control through another person under Section 8-106(d)(3), the time on which priority would be based under this paragraph if the other person were the secured party; or
(C) if the collateral is a commodity contract carried with a commodity intermediary, the satisfaction of the requirement for control specified in Section 9-106(b)(2) with respect to commodity contracts carried or to be carried with the commodity intermediary.
(3) A security interest held by a securities intermediary in a security entitlement or a securities account maintained with the securities intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.
(4) A security interest held by a commodity intermediary in a commodity contract or a commodity account maintained with the commodity intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.
(5) A security interest in a certificated security in registered form which is perfected by taking delivery under Section 9-313(a) and not by control under Section 9-314 has priority over a conflicting security interest perfected by a method other than control.
(6) Conflicting security interests created by a broker, securities intermediary, or commodity intermediary which are perfected without control under Section 9-106 rank equally.
(7) In all other cases, priority among conflicting security interests in investment property is governed by Sections 9-322 and 9-323.
Code of the District of Columbia - §28 8–511. Priority among security interests and entitlement holders. D.C. Law Library
https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/28~8-511.html
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, if a securities intermediary does not have sufficient interests in a particular financial asset to satisfy both its obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements to that financial asset and its obligation to a creditor of the securities intermediary who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claims of entitlement holders, other than the creditor, have priority over the claim of the creditor.
(b) A claim of a creditor of a securities intermediary who has a security interest in a financial asset held by a securities intermediary has priority over claims of the securities intermediary’s entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to that financial asset if the creditor has control over the financial asset.
(c) If a clearing corporation does not have sufficient financial assets to satisfy both its obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to a financial asset and its obligation to a creditor of the clearing corporation who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claim of the creditor has priority over the claims of entitlement holders.
§ 8-501. SECURITIES ACCOUNT; ACQUISITION OF SECURITY ENTITLEMENT FROM SECURITIES INTERMEDIARY
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/8-501
(a) "Securities account" means an account to which a financial asset is or may be credited in accordance with an agreement under which the person maintaining the account undertakes to treat the person for whom the account is maintained as entitled to exercise the rights that comprise the financial asset.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (d) and (e), a person acquires a security entitlement if a securities intermediary:
(1) indicates by book entry that a financial asset has been credited to the person's securities account;
(2) receives a financial asset from the person or acquires a financial asset for the person and, in either case, accepts it for credit to the person's securities account; or
(3) becomes obligated under other law, regulation, or rule to credit a financial asset to the person's securities account.
(c) If a condition of subsection (b) has been met, a person has a security entitlement even though the securities intermediary does not itself hold the financial asset.
(d) If a securities intermediary holds a financial asset for another person, and the financial asset is registered in the name of, payable to the order of, or specially indorsed to the other person, and has not been indorsed to the securities intermediary or in blank, the other person is treated as holding the financial asset directly rather than as having a security entitlement with respect to the financial asset.
(e) Issuance of a security is not establishment of a security entitlement.
§ 8-102. DEFINITIONS.
(17) "Security entitlement" means the rights and property interest of an entitlement holder with respect to a financial asset specified in Part 5.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/8-102#Securityentitlement
§ 8-511. PRIORITY AMONG SECURITY INTERESTS AND ENTITLEMENT HOLDERS.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/8-511
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (b) and (c), if a securities intermediary does not have sufficient interests in a particular financial asset to satisfy both its obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements to that financial asset and its obligation to a creditor of the securities intermediary who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claims of entitlement holders, other than the creditor, have priority over the claim of the creditor.
(b) A claim of a creditor of a securities intermediary who has a security interest in a financial asset held by a securities intermediary has priority over claims of the securities intermediary's entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to that financial asset if the creditor has control over the financial asset.
(c) If a clearing corporation does not have sufficient financial assets to satisfy both its obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to a financial asset and its obligation to a creditor of the clearing corporation who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claim of the creditor has priority over the claims of entitlement holders.
17 CFR § 240.13d-3 - Determination of beneficial owner.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/240.13d-3
§ 240.13d-3 Determination of beneficial owner.
(a) For the purposes of sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Act a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares:
(1) Voting power which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such security; and/or,
(2) Investment power which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security.
(b) Any person who, directly or indirectly, creates or uses a trust, proxy, power of attorney, pooling arrangement or any other contract, arrangement, or device with the purpose of effect of divesting such person of beneficial ownership of a security or preventing the vesting of such beneficial ownership as part of a plan or scheme to evade the reporting requirements of section 13(d) or (g) of the Act shall be deemed for purposes of such sections to be the beneficial owner of such security.
(c) All securities of the same class beneficially owned by a person, regardless of the form which such beneficial ownership takes, shall be aggregated in calculating the number of shares beneficially owned by such person.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this rule:
(1)
(i) A person shall be deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security, subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this rule, if that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such security, as defined in Rule 13d–3(a) (§ 240.13d–3(a)) within sixty days, including but not limited to any right to acquire: (A) Through the exercise of any option, warrant or right; (B) through the conversion of a security; (C) pursuant to the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account, or similar arrangement; or (D) pursuant to the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement; provided, however, any person who acquires a security or power specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i)(A), (B) or (C), of this section, with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing the control of the issuer, or in connection with or as a participant in any transaction having such purpose or effect, immediately upon such acquisition shall be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the securities which may be acquired through the exercise or conversion of such security or power. Any securities not outstanding which are subject to such options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges shall be deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding securities of the class owned by such person but shall not be deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class by any other person.
(ii) Paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section remains applicable for the purpose of determining the obligation to file with respect to the underlying security even though the option, warrant, right or convertible security is of a class of equity security, as defined in § 240.13d–1(i), and may therefore give rise to a separate obligation to file.
(2) A member of a national securities exchange shall not be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities held directly or indirectly by it on behalf of another person solely because such member is the record holder of such securities and, pursuant to the rules of such exchange, may direct the vote of such securities, without instruction, on other than contested matters or matters that may affect substantially the rights or privileges of the holders of the securities to be voted, but is otherwise precluded by the rules of such exchange from voting without instruction.
(3) A person who in the ordinary course of his business is a pledgee of securities under a written pledge agreement shall not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such pledged securities until the pledgee has taken all formal steps necessary which are required to declare a default and determines that the power to vote or to direct the vote or to dispose or to direct the disposition of such pledged securities will be exercised, provided, that:
(i) The pledgee agreement is bona fide and was not entered into with the purpose nor with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the issuer, nor in connection with any transaction having such purpose or effect, including any transaction subject to Rule 13d–3(b);
(ii) The pledgee is a person specified in Rule 13d–1(b)(ii), including persons meeting the conditions set forth in paragraph (G) thereof; and
(iii) The pledgee agreement, prior to default, does not grant to the pledgee;
(A) The power to vote or to direct the vote of the pledged securities; or
(B) The power to dispose or direct the disposition of the pledged securities, other than the grant of such power(s) pursuant to a pledge agreement under which credit is extended subject to regulation T (12 CFR 220.1 to 220.8) and in which the pledgee is a broker or dealer registered under section 15 of the act.
(4) A person engaged in business as an underwriter of securities who acquires securities through his participation in good faith in a firm commitment underwriting registered under the Securities Act of 1933 shall not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such securities until the expiration of forty days after the date of such acquisition.
1st Sticky of Sep-2020
Breaking: Hamas announces deal to end escalation with Israel.
https://greatawakening.win/p/HEJ5ZuQr/x/c/
It's interesting going through some of these old stickies.
De-escalation didn't happen but Hamas vs Israel has certainly been one of the forefronts of this worldwide conflict!
I keep coming back to this title and getting confused.
Shouldn't Covid Vaccination be Dependently associated with Long Covid if it is the vaccine causing it? Because then they'd be related to or dependent on one another.
Nimarata "Nikki Haley" Randhawa is a fucking liar that will say anything to get power.
Archived post and images:
I'm saying make new connections that have never been made before by other humans. Unveiling new truths takes an immense imagination.
Randomly creating stories is not difficult when the AI has been given millions of prompts from books. Have you ever played Dwarf Fortress? That game is not an AI but it also does the same thing making extremely deep stories every time the game is played.
You can have a set structure for a story and options for different parts of the story be randomly generated. This is not imaginative.
I disagree, there is no morals with it just as there are no morals programmed in humans DNA. There's personality and intelligence but not morals.
Morals, values, and principles to uphold change from civilization to civilization. China's morals, values, and principles to uphold are very different from traditional Western Civilization. Ancient Greeks were vastly different in worldview than average Europeans today.
You could say that morals, values and principles is the DNA of a civilization but it is not in the DNA of a person.
The way an AI comes up with an answer has nothing to do with morality. The people training it and preventing the AI from giving certain responses over others is them imposing their own moral view of the world on the AI, and that is terrifying.
Everything that is a neural network or classic ML uses statistics in its decision-making process. There is no AI without the statistics done in the background.
This needs yo go on the cover of The Atlantic!
All of it is statistics, there are just added rules to the statistics.
For example
Speech Recognition: While statistical models like Hidden Markov Models are used, speech recognition also involves signal processing and pattern recognition techniques.
Signal Processing is very statistical heavy (This is why the next level up in knowledge is Statistical Signal Processing) and so is pattern recognition (which is basically ML).
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: This involves creating symbolic models to represent knowledge, often without direct reliance on statistical methods.
Automated Statistics are used to map and measure features from past training data with the input and give you a decision. The AI is mapping the given input with what it has been trained to respond to. There is a threshold/max response to the given inputs and features computed which becomes your output. Different potential outputs are measured against statistically in the background and the highest value becomes the response.
Anything with a Neural Network is using statistics in the background computing the features.
Classic ML is using statistics much more blatantly. You need to look deeper.
THE DEFINITION OF STATISTICS
Statistics is the discipline that concerns the collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data.
Thats exactly wtf every AI is doing. It doesn't have an imagination, it doesn't think up new concepts/ideas/philosophies, it crunches the numbers from past data and whatever input is given.
Can the AI create different models from the same information given? Can the AI come up with multiple viewpoints concurrently? Can the AI give us new philosophies, science breakthroughs, tech?
It doesn't have a concept of morality, just what the user wants to hear. There is no Good vs Evil, God vs Satan with an AI. It doesn't come out with new information or insights after reading the Bible or physics papers, it just parrots what's already been said.
It is automated statistics. It is trained on how to respond to certain prompts. It is not alive or sentient. You are much more than a bunch of numbers. The AI we see right now is not.
Tore at the beginning doesn't get that AI is just automated statistics. It doesn't have a moral concept of Good and Evil, it just crunches the numbers.
I'm so fing tired of people blowing it way beyond proportions and trying to humanize it. Its Artificial Intelligence, it's not human.
Wow this is so fake and gay. All in American English, no Arabic accent just deep voice (sounds menacing), Arabic characters sub are an afterthought on the bottom.
Not quoting the Quran, not very meaningfully pulling on the emotions of an Arab. Completely bullshit and obvious to an extremist Islamic cult follower. It's CIA and we all know.
Also gotta add in there
Here's where you can buy the book for The Great Taking. There's a free downloadable PDF available as well.
Archived Zip File of all references from "The Great Taking" minus [48], [27] (Video has been scrubbed) and [10] (Don't have an electronic copy of the '87 Book) https://files.catbox.moe/6pxbwr.zip
Full [48] is too big to be included in a catbox.moe link, It hasn't been scrubbed off YouTube yet. (October-19-2020) Cross-Border Payment -- A Vision for the Future | IMF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVmKN4DSu3g
Source [4] or [5] citing Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 8 and 9 as the legal right to take all of your security investments.
A link to the source is here https://archive.org/details/ec-clearing-questionnaire/page/19/mode/2up
U.c.c. - Article 8 - Investment Securities (1994) can be found here https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8
U.c.c. - Article 9 - Secured Transactions (2010) can be found here https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/9
Extra research on David Rogers Webb - Author of "The Great Taking"
EXTRA-on-David-Rogers-Webb.zip 73.2 MB https://files.catbox.moe/24nvf2.zip
Share this as well
Here's where you can buy the book for The Great Taking. There's a free downloadable PDF available as well.
Archived Zip File of all references from "The Great Taking" minus [48], [27] (Video has been scrubbed) and [10] (Don't have an electronic copy of the '87 Book) https://files.catbox.moe/6pxbwr.zip
Full [48] is too big to be included in a catbox.moe link, It hasn't been scrubbed off YouTube yet. (October-19-2020) Cross-Border Payment -- A Vision for the Future | IMF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVmKN4DSu3g
Source [4] or [5] citing Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 8 and 9 as the legal right to take all of your security investments.
A link to the source is here https://archive.org/details/ec-clearing-questionnaire/page/19/mode/2up
U.c.c. - Article 8 - Investment Securities (1994) can be found here https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8
U.c.c. - Article 9 - Secured Transactions (2010) can be found here https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/9
Extra research on David Rogers Webb - Author of "The Great Taking"
EXTRA-on-David-Rogers-Webb.zip 73.2 MB https://files.catbox.moe/24nvf2.zip
Watch The Great Taking documentary. It should be regularly posted on here for users to see.
Likely a psyop, could be a test on how decent the Deep State is at shutting down phones and controlling the flow of information.