1
corrbrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like "uncommitted" beat Biden in the Michigan and Pennsylvania primaries.

1
corrbrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is every minority official just trying to prove that they have been advanced well beyond their abilities? It's almost like they are mocking us, "Na, na, I got mine. Thanks gringos."

1
corrbrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately "bipartisan" reforms reach by the uniparty are useless, and usually cost us a lot.

1
corrbrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Buying anything illegal with a currency in which every transaction can be traced is not only something Elizabeth Warren would do.

1
corrbrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Both the fields of virology and infectious disease are filled with inconsistencies and things that make you go, "hmm." But only if you're a critical thinker. Well done.

1
corrbrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Genetically sequencing is as big a fraud as virology. The meaning of genetically sequencing is not what we are encouraged to believe it is. No one ever sequences an organism genome from end-to-end. Instead, short continuous segments of amino acid, or contigs, are assembled into something that satisfies the researcher's criteria from sequences mined from genomic databases. For SARS-COV-2, the criteria was the longest sequence that resembles SARS-COV-1. That's it.

In other words any sequence obtained is a puzzle solved by computer, based on other sequences that were assembled in the same way. A sequence thus obtained is almost guaranteed to have no bases in reality whatsoever (I make an exception for very short sequences). It is fraud all the way down.

I know because the first year of my Comp Sci doctorate was spent working in bioinformatics -- the application of software algorithms and heuristics to biology. Most notably gene sequencing.

2
corrbrick 2 points ago +3 / -1

I am unaware of photos of any human viruses. Bacterial viruses, or phages, yes, but not human ones. The excitement that virology felt on the advent of the electron microscope quickly turned to despair when it failed to reveal the elusive virus. Virology was on it's way out when it was resurrected by John Ender's 1957(?) paper on cell cultures, in which he claimed the observed effects on a culture proved the existence of viruses. A conclusion that was invalidated by his very own control experiment!

Since then virologists have used nothing but cell cultures for proof without ever running a control experiment! This shortcoming makes virology a pseudoscience. Additionally, the meaning of the word "isolation" had to be redefined in order to make it consistent with a cell culture tainted with things like antibiotics, and calf serum.

The fact of the matter is, the virus is much too valuable a weapon for the deep state to lose: it can't be detected by anyone like us, so we must rely on the word of experts, and tests that don't actually work as demonstrated by the plandemic. I suspect anyone who appears to be on our side, and maintains the reality of viruses to be controlled opposition. That's why I'm vary glad to see someone like Mike Yeadon come to the conclusions he has.

2
corrbrick 2 points ago +2 / -0

And national security is a BS justification, because it's always national security.

2
corrbrick 2 points ago +3 / -1

He also followed an honest arc from true believer to heavy skeptic, merely by questioning his previous assumptions. It's been a joy to watch.

3
corrbrick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even more fundamental: Instead of saying "gender" say "sex." They have different meanings.

4
corrbrick 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because birds give milk obviously. Or something. The "success" of covid convinced them that everyone is just plain stupid and will believe whatever the media say.

view more: Next ›