2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

They admitted at the hearing today. There's nothing hidden about this film and researchers have known about it for decades.

I don't think Luna even asked about it

I think she was either using it to hype her hearing or somebody called her afterwards and said this is not a secret film and she probably misunderstood what they were talking about and went too far with it.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems she put out a press release.

An old school statement. To the news media

Might be her family that put it out

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Michael Baden did not even see JFK's body

That would have been pretty hard to do in 1978. You know given with JFK being dead and all.

Then, he also said that the Parkland Hospital docs did not see what they said they saw. Baden said all of them were mistaken and he was right.

The doctors in parkland did not perform an autopsy. No doctor anywhere in Texas performed an autopsy on JFK.

The doctors in parkland hospital were trying to save JFK's life. That's what they were doing. They were not doing an autopsy. They did not turn JFK's body over. They did not see the gunshot wound on his back.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was no medical examiner in Texas who examined JFK.

JFK was taken to a hospital in Dallas where the hospitals were emergency room, doctors, trauma, doctors who were trying to save JFK's life, they were not performing an autopsy. In fact, they never even turned JFK over.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was in the later '70s.

They finished their report in 1978 and then delivered the report in 19 in 1979.

His testimony before Congress made him a celebrity medical examiner so he soon became an expert witness in a lot of cases. He also has a show called autopsy on Max.

So he was not the medical examiner of record in the JFK case. He, along with nine others reviewed the autopsy in the 1970s.

He worked the Epstein case cuz he was hired by Epstein's brother.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, the US government said that if Chrysler wanted a loan to save it from bankruptcy it had to cut costs.

Turbines did end up in military vehicles but they were not Chrysler Turbines.

Lycoming Engines makes them.

In the 45 years since no other company has decided to put turbine engines in consumer cars cuz it's a terrible idea.

Turbines are best when operating at maximum power. Which is nowhere close to how most people drive.

They are really inefficient in start and stop traffic. They respond really slowly when accelerating and decelerating. Like wait two seconds after you hit the pedal. Their output is hot enough to melt the paint on the car behind you.

We don't have turbines in cars because they're not a good idea and inefficient

A couple companies tried turbines in buses, but I'm not sure they are still in business.

A new thing now is to use a micro turbine to power an electrical vehicle.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tesla tech as it was theorized to work would set humankind free, forever.

See what I said about Tesla being a showman.

Tesla lived for decades after JP Morgan cut off his funding.

If he had something that worked he could have just written out exactly what he was talking about. He could have left that to anybody. He could have sold that.

The energy that Tesla was talking about wirelessly transmitting would still need to be generated. The Tesla plant had giant generators And he still had to pay for the fuel to generate that electricity

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently Congresswoman Luna is quite the Oliver Stone fan.

What parts were disinformation?

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope.

Westinghouse paid Tesla quite a bunch of money. Which Tesla happily spent. Tesla was not successful as a business man and lived in fancy hotels, this why he was why he was in debt so much.

He was a great showman but he ultimately didn't deliver. The myth of Tesla doesn't live up to the reality.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

JP Morgan isn't the real issue.

If what Tesla was proposing was technically feasible, it could be done by now. Sciences for has advanced far beyond where Tesla was back in his day.

It's not just the money.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

We now know way more about electromagnetism than Tesla did in his day.

If what he was proposing was technically successful, it would be built by now and companies would be using it the world over.

Tesla was a great showman and he's a great story, but he wasn't infallible

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even in space, I believe, you get less energy the more the distance traveled.

So to move energy great distances requires great amounts of energy

5
DueProcessFan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tesla did not have devices for free generation of energy. He claimed you could wirelessly transmit energy for free. And he never got his power station on Long Island working. He wouldn't have died poor if he did.

An AI summary

Tesla's Vision: Tesla believed in a future where electricity could be transmitted wirelessly, using the Earth itself as a giant conductor, eliminating the need for wires.

Wardenclyffe Tower: The Wardenclyffe Tower, built on Long Island, New York, was intended to demonstrate this wireless power transmission system.

Not "Free" Energy: It's important to note that Tesla's system wasn't about creating energy from thin air. The energy would still need to be generated through conventional means, but the transmission would be wireless

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Constitutional Rights apply to you because you are in the United States.

The Constitution prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Citizenship gives you the right to vote and the right to hold office.

Other rights you already have.

For example, a family from Toronto wants to go to Disney World

They have the right to free speech even if they are Canadian citizens. The Dad could wear an F.... Trudeau shirt and the Mom could wear an F... Trump shirt without fear of arrest.

If their son gets arrested by the Orlando PD, he still has the right to remain silent, he still has the right to an attorney.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry, but this doesn't make sense to me.

She is either going into protection or not.

How does being estranged protect her but staying put protect her?

It took me 3 minutes to find the area she is living because it's on her Instagram.

If she keeps posting on social media, we no she's not in protection.

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember this from last week?

GOP Rep. claims NBC is hiding evidence that proves Lee Harvey Oswald did not assassinate JFK

This is the film she is talking about. The hidden film is on you tube

https://youtu.be/g5vBks-kQmk?si=p-mnySguwD8wEnA7

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

This apparently is the movie Rep Luna says NBC is hiding.

https://youtu.be/g5vBks-kQmk?si=p-mnySguwD8wEnA7

She claims Lee Harvey Oswald is in the background.

3
DueProcessFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just looking a news reports of this and th first death was an unvaccinated child in Lubbock and the outbreak started where vaccination rates were low as I assumed.

But vaccination rates have since fallen, and just 80% of those in the Texas county where the outbreak began were inoculated against measles, well below the 95% needed for so-called herd immunity.

Thanks for the hospitality

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›