If he wasn't senile or demented, I would say this was a giant FU to Harris and Obama.
Yeah, I'm that age bracket, and you certainly can't see my ribs...
Kek, that is a perfect morphed image...
I have to admit, that Alex Jones was one of the people to turn me from being a normie. It happened some 10-15 years ago. I listened to him a lot back then, but I really hated it when he interrupted his interviewees. He did that constantly, so I eventually stopped following him...
She would have been great in 1930's Germany...
Wow, is that him to the right? He's a spitting image of his dad. It seems the Trump sons could continue when he finishes in 4 years. The Trump dynasty could be in charge the next 30 years ...
Interesting.
Yes, written it is easier. I wouldn't say I can read Dutch, but knowing German, and if I try to read phonetically, I can get the gist of what is written.
We Danes have a language, that most foreigners say they cannot pronounce. We think Dutch is even worse than Danish.
(sorry, I know what you mean and agree, just couldn't resist... 😀)
I did not say he bombed! It was a hypothetical, that if he bombed, we were all screwed.
Correct me if I am wrong, but the conservative side is notorious for a low turnout. Trump even said, if Christians would vote he would win. I am paraphrasing the part about the Christians, but that was when the media said "Trump says he would fix the elections".
Yikes, that is a scary looking mosquito!
As many of us said back then, it was the largest social experiment in the world.
Me neither, though in my country the debate is in the middle of the night...
Yeah, but it is under a third of the US population that is on X. I don't think one would call them the general public? I don't believe social media users are a representative segment of the population. At least not yet...
Yes Q said that many times, but not in reference to examples like what you linked to. See my other post in this thread.
You cannot consider examples like OP's link, as consecutive coincidences.
The probability of finding some tweet today, that matches in some small way with any of the 4600+ Q posts, is let's say, X. The probability of finding a new tweet tomorrow that matches with any of the 4600+ Q posts, is also X. It is not a new coincidence, it is the same probability.
One could also argue, that there is a component of confirmation bias involved. In the above example, the link tries to match "if you build it, he will come", with a Q post saying "make it and they will crumb". I find this reaching. the only thing that validates the example is the date, but the Q post has nothing to do with James Earl Jones.
I am not trying to belittle or cast doubt on the Q posts, but I would like the discussions to be more sober, and not to the likes of gematria. Q never mentioned examples like this, as coincidences. Coincidences (that really wasn't a coincidence) to Q was an event that took place shortly after a post, or that Trump tweeted within seconds of a Q post of the same subject matter. Now those are definitely not coincidences!
Coincidence? With 4500 Q posts, the probability of a "delta" with a future event is not that low. Coincidence is much more probable, than time travel.
No surprise here...
Problem is, O'Keefe can publish what he wants, but nothing really reaches the general public through the legacy media.
Sad, I liked him. He was also Darth Vader.
I really liked his voice, it was so deep, soothing and calm.
May he rest in peace.
Unfortunately, the nations they migrate to, tend to become muslim over time...
How is he able to do all that travelling and rallies in his age? It's amazing...
Same here. Even though Goog sucks, I find the most code stuff through Google. Nothing beats Yandex for political stuff.
Whenever I hear "tested positive for", I become suspicious.
Is he trying to say he's imprisoned by his handlers?
Exactly, gematria is just confirmation bias.