3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two thoughts:

  1. "If Trump is indicted but NOT convicted, it will re-elect him". Said Former National Security Adviser. Watch his short video at https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTedw5oY/if-trump-is-indicted-but-not-con/c/

  2. I'm assuming that Trump means "PEACEFUL protests". Hopefully, during their peaceful protest, nobody will get fooled into an illegal behavior trap. You can expect that people with Evil behaviors will infiltrate all peaceful protest. Trying to entrap people. I suggest to simply NOT engage them. IGNORE them. Instead, resume your PEACEFUL protests. Assuming that PEACEFUL protests are allowed within your local community.

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think a conviction on this type of case would prevent Trump from running anyways would it?

I do not know. The Constitution does not say anything about a no-conviction requirement. Source at https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C5-1/ALDE_00013692/

My understanding of what the Former National Security Adviser said is that if Trump is NOT convicted, this would boost his support significantly. In turn, he will be re-elected for a 2nd term. In comparison, if he is convicted, legally speaking, this would not prevent him from running, but this would negatively affect his support.

Disclaimer: About Warmonger-Bolton, I do NOT trust him. I do NOT support him. But on his statement above, I agree with him.

One benefit with a statement from Warmonger-Bolton is that it can easily be use with both Biden or Trump supporter. Because his statement is good for Trump. While at the same time Warmonger-Bolton as a very long history of supporting the DNC. Plus, he is a Warmonger-household name with the Main $tream Media$. So lots of visibility.

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +1 / -0

"If Trump is indicted but NOT convicted, it will re-elect him". Said Former National Security Adviser

Link to his video at https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTedw5oY/

3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

"If Trump is indicted but NOT convicted, it will re-elect him". Said Former National Security Adviser

Link to his video at https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTedw5oY/

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I reposted the same link with an updated title at https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTedw5oY/

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +1 / -0

For those who missed the news

Trump says he expects to be arrested Tuesday [February 21st, 2023], urges nation to protest

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trump-says-he-expects-be-arrested-tuesday-cals-nationwide-protests

I'm assuming that Trump means "PEACEFULLY protest"

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like to add Cardano to the list of alternatives

Done. We reviewed Cardano. I do NOT trust Cardano.

Why? Because:

  • Cardano is presently HEAVILY CENTRALIZED. Which is BAD for you. In other words, Cardano is presently part of the CENTRALIZED problem. Not part of a present DECENTRALIZED solution.

  • According to Undersearcher, Cardano is NOT presently decentralized because "IOHK, Emurgo and the Cardano Foundation are in control of the ecosystem as a whole — including all current stake pools" Source:

  • Cardano is misleading its investors, developers, and users. Cardano mislead them by not clearly communicating to them that is PRESENTLY centralized and that in the FUTURE, they MIGHT be decentralized. The keyword here is "MIGHT". This is risky. Obviously, PRESENT centralized and FUTURE DECENTRALIZED are NOT to be confused. For those familiar with crypto, according to Cardano themselves, their "decentralized" crypto is a "Proof of concept". Meaning, it is NOT presently decentralized. But in the FUTURE, could be. Source and details are into the above links.

  • In the future, Cardano might be decentralized. But this is very unlikely and very risky to invest in. Because Cardano started on a HEAVILY CENTRALIZED foundation. And as of now, is still building on a HEAVILY CENTRALIZED foundation. Time will tell if Cardano will shift from CENTRALIZED to DECENTRALIZED. Meanwhile, there are plenty of alternatives presently fully REALLY DECENTRALIZED.

2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do NOT trust gold IRA. Because Gold IRA is part of the CENTRALIZED problem. Not part of the DECENTRALIZED solution.

For those not familiar with gold IRA, it is a paper-gold. It is not physical-gold. Yes, you can go at the vault asking to see and old your physical goal. But the challenge is that to do that you're dependent on a CENTRALIZED third party. I do NOT trust any form of paper-gold or paper-silver or paper-crypto.

By leaving your gold IRA at a third party vault, you expose yourself to a CENTRALIZED third party limiting or blocking your transactions or access to it. Or worst, stealing it! Because the centralized holder disagree with your feelings or thoughts.

Physical gold might be useful if ONLY YOU have access to it. For example:

  • Stored in a safe in your private home. NOT at a centralized third party. But then, for trading, you have to find people interested. Which might be a challenge for daily transaction or large volume.

  • Still store at home. For a long term investment. Assuming you have surplus, you are willing to lose.

2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for sharing. I'll check it out.

I found Cardano Libre Software (Open Source) is at https://cardanoupdates.com

3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

What happens when the internet goes down?

For the last 15 years, in my local community, the internet was available more than 99% of the time. During that period, I recall a total of 2 days of internet down.

In the unlikely event that the internet goes down, with most App (software), your transaction simply automatically resume when the internet is back up.

If your transaction is a real emergency. Which can't wait for when the internet is back. You still can do transaction right away without internet:

  • Simply use another network. There are many alternative networks to internet.
  • Use a software (App) in a local network (LAN) without internet access. Usually, for many Apps, it is a simple one click button called "Enable local peer discovery setting". For example, if I need to do a real emergency transaction now, one of many options is in person, or via phone call, with the supplier, both parties activate their local peer discovery. Then proceed with their transaction. Done. After the internet is back up, this transaction is recorded on the blockchain. This is called "polled".
  • Use cash. I always have a small mouth of cash at the ready for a real emergency.
  • Use a local LETS exchange with another network than internet. My favorite is https://communityforge.net Software code is available for free at https://www.drupal.org/project/cforge
  • Barter
4
Francewhoa 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do not trust the Federal Reserve (Fed)'s fiat CBDC. Their CDBC seems like a cousin of the CBDC. So I do NOT trust both.

Why? Because both the CBDC and the CDBC are CENTRALIZED.

Centralized is BAD for you. Decentralized is GOOD for you.

Decentralized alternatives to CBDC in my post at https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTeaUhjH/

5
Francewhoa 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is a good list of why by catsfive above

I suggest adding to this list that, according to NATO's suppliers themselves, they allegedly use drones to SPREAD BIOWEAPONS IN THE AIR OVER BOTH RUSSIAN CITIZENS & UKRAINIAN CITIZENS

Source with video, document, photos. One of those document includes an order for a drone. Specifically asking their suppliers for drones able to fly a few liters of "liquid":

______• Video interview with John & Zack about Ukraine Biolabs whistleblower at https://rumble.com/vwqhsd-us-and-ukraine-docs-prove-biolabs-russian-federation-response.html

______• BioLab documents alleged evidence, Translated to English at https://badvolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/US-Biolabs-in-Ukraine-BadVolf-Investigation-Eng-Translation.pdf

_________• https://web.archive.org/web/20220313003714/https://badvolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/US-Biolabs-in-Ukraine-BadVolf-Investigation-Eng-Translation.pdf

______• Biolab documents alleged evidence, original in Russian at https://badvolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/US-Biolabs-in-Ukraine-BadVolf-Investigation.pdf

_________• https://web.archive.org/web/20220312231741/https://badvolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/US-Biolabs-in-Ukraine-BadVolf-Investigation.pdf

______• Ukrainian alleged abuses against Russian people in the Donbass (Eastern Ukraine) at https://badvolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Truth-about-Ukrain-crimes-in-the-Donbass.pdf

_________• https://web.archive.org/web/20220316173901/https://badvolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Truth-about-Ukrain-crimes-in-the-Donbass.pdf

___• Lots of short videos & news about Ukraine at https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnMarkDougan-BadVolf/videos

___• News about Ukraine at https://badvolf.com/the-special-operation-in-ukraine/

___• Show your support with a donation to John Mark Dougan at https://patreon.com/BadVolf

3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed, Russia dispatched a pair of Su-27 fighter aircraft to intercept the MQ-9 Reaper.

It is believed that Russian forces dispatched from Crimea recovered most, if not all, the wreckage, including the top-secret intelligence pod that had been mounted under the left wing of the aircraft. If this is the case, critical US intelligence collection capabilities would have been compromised, allowing Russia to better protect itself from sensors like the one carried onboard the downed MQ-9 Reaper aircraft.

Source is Scott Ritter

https://sputniknews.com/20230315/us-account-of-black-sea-incident-unrealistic-as-su-27-would-have-sustained-serious-damages---expert-1108438667.html

https://archive.ph/ARBzE

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/03/16/mq-9-drone-incident-bidens-dangerous-escalation/

https://archive.ph/oW7z2

3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed, Russia dispatched a pair of Su-27 fighter aircraft to intercept the MQ-9 Reaper.

It is believed that Russian forces dispatched from Crimea recovered most, if not all, the wreckage, including the top-secret intelligence pod that had been mounted under the left wing of the aircraft. If this is the case, critical US intelligence collection capabilities would have been compromised, allowing Russia to better protect itself from sensors like the one carried onboard the downed MQ-9 Reaper aircraft.

Source is Scott Ritter

https://sputniknews.com/20230315/us-account-of-black-sea-incident-unrealistic-as-su-27-would-have-sustained-serious-damages---expert-1108438667.html

https://archive.ph/ARBzE

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/03/16/mq-9-drone-incident-bidens-dangerous-escalation/

https://archive.ph/oW7z2

2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +2 / -0

On March 14, 2023, an MQ-9 Reaper operating out of Campia Turzii was flying in international airspace over the Black Sea, west of Crimea. This was a standard flight profile for the MQ-9 Reaper, one that had the Russians concerned, given its proximity to sensitive Russian military installations.

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/03/16/mq-9-drone-incident-bidens-dangerous-escalation/

https://archive.ph/oW7z2

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›