1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t disagree with Ramthun and his approach. Love him. Just never stood a chance against Rebecca and her funding IMO. A lot of normies in love with the lifetime politician. Insert Michels; his blue collar backing, AND self funding. He hasn’t been necessarily as vocal about the elections; perhaps kept a little distance from the rabbit hole to target the entire crowd. His mentality is in line.

2
Frog44Man 2 points ago +2 / -0

Michels gov, Ron Johnson senate, Derrick_Van_Orden house, Janel Brandtjen state legislature, and Adam Steen state legislature.

Only trump endorsements from WI.

2
Frog44Man 2 points ago +2 / -0

So far so good here, Waukesha Wi. Black ink pens only.

1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blue collar, cement mason here. I also attended the trump rally in Waukesha, where Michels spoke. I don’t see where the “red flags are.” And I’ve been dilligently monitoring this gov race; as unbias as you could imagine. I am Michels corporations biggest critic; seeing as I bleed every day for them.

1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

I work for Michels, I’m honestly curious as to why you think this? He was part of trumps energy and infrastructure board. The entire company has been tremendous throughout the Covid BS. They scream and bleed red. I would love to hear your reasons with sources.

1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

I personally think he has great interests; as far as infrastructure goes and job growth, plus he sneakily remains a good candidate for the normies that are unhappy with evers. Michels Corp which is a large corporation.. is “pro union” which is somewhat odd for a Republican. But; in theory it’s a good mix, going up against the mob of the powers behind some of the labor unions. Michels dominates in their sectors in energy and infrastructure especially in the Great Lakes region. Wisconsin geographically is an absolute goldmine for rare earth materials, energy and transportation. I think he has strengths; that no other candidates can even touch, his approach has really been phenomenal.

If you have followed WI; WI is the root to a lot of the corruption.

3
Frog44Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be Frank; what makes you sour about Michels? Served on trumps infrastructure & energy board. Also won’t say Biden won the election. Not a career politician.

I work for Michels, in building foundations and the company screams Trump.

He may not be playing the radical card but TBH I don’t see how he doesn’t fit the bill.

Honesty just looking for something I might be missing.

3
Frog44Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

We are well prepped and prepared.

Q is posting in real time; it’s here.

Get ready Frens. It’s about to get real shit stormy.

Kek.

1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ask only questions you know the answers to. Cliche but yet; very true when especially it comes to congress and finance.

1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only reason I ask; is I do this to keep myself in the threshold to have unlimited day trades in margin. Although I don’t utilize it at the moment.

1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Curious; I have most of my shares in computer share; but what would be the disadvantage if I kept some in my fidelity account?

2
Frog44Man 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you catch that part in the Rally when trump spoke about the Olympics; as if something was going to happen? It seemed like it might’ve slipped a little bit; and then he finished it up saying “he can predict these things”

Not his exact words. But that part definitely got my attention.

by BQnita
1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why we have these conversations commerade. Again; this is why I re shared it.

Thoughts: if WI decertifies, and others follow. Is that still true?

What about impeachment etc?

Constructive conversation.

by BQnita
1
Frog44Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like I said; I am just sharing.

I thought of that as well; but he did specifically say arrest Biden, arrest pelosi but didn’t use the word arrest when talking about grassley. So perhaps he meant; grassley takes a larger role in succession. Not sure if that would make sense either.

by BQnita
3
Frog44Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

My goosebumps are the Rocky Mountains.

by BQnita
7
Frog44Man 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah; I figured someone could point out a flaw.

I guess; military the only way. Must we not forget.

by BQnita
35
Frog44Man 35 points ago +36 / -1

Found this in a telegram group, decoding chat. It now has some serious SAUCE. Fun to speculate.

Here's my theory/spitball from Jan 1. Here we go..... If Kamala is gonna get nominated for Supreme Court, then someone MUST RETIRE OR DIE on SCOTUS. Stephen Breyer is old & liberal. He will most likely retire. Then Biden will nominate Kamala, & she will resign as Vice President. In order to be confirmed, Kamala will have to have hearing & be confirmed by the Senate only. Senate currently has majority 50/50 with Schumer in charge. Normally, VICE PRESIDENT would be deciding majority vote. But it will be vacant until she's confirmed. She can't vote.

That would mean we needed a Democrat Senator to resign or be removed bc of criminal charges or indictment. If a Democrat Senator from a state with a Republican Governor resigns, then the Republican Governor can immediately install whoever they choose……they can install a REPUBLICAN. Which Democrat Senator currently has a brand new Republican Governor? Virginia. Glenn Youngkin. Which Democrat Senator might be indicted by Durham?

The Virginia Senator that was planned to run as Vice President with Hillary Clinton maybe? Tim Kaine. Breyer resigns. Kamala nominated, Kamala resigns. Durham serves Tim Kaine an indictment. Tim Kaine resigns Gov Youngkin appoints a Republican Senator. Republicans now have the majority in the Senate. Schumer in no longer majority leader. Mitch McConnell is now the leader of the SCOTUS hearing. The same Mitch McConnell that refused to let Obama appoint Merrick Garland during election year of 2016. Same Mitch McConnell that waited so that Trump could appoint Kavanaugh to SCOTUS.

Same Mitch McConnell that waited so that Trump could appoint Kavanaugh to SCOTUS. Same Mitch McConnell that let Trump appoint & confirmed Amy Cohen Barrett in an election year in 2020. This was the plan all along. It's why Young kin distanced himself from Trump, so it wouldn't look like a scheme. It's why Trump has distanced himself from McConnell, so it wouldn't look like a scheme. Then comes the first arrest…BIDEN. Then comes Pelosi arrest. Then comes Grassley. Then comes the FLIP.

3
Frog44Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

I clicked on this for the telescope quick; and it turned into about 3 hours of rabbit hole. This stuff is amazing. Thanks for sharing.

view more: Next ›