-1
LookAway -1 points ago +3 / -4

My guesses:

  1. Trying to bait the media to talk about his fast tracking the vax and the conundrum of him supporting the vax relative to his supporters
  2. He's on their team

Unlikely options:

  1. He doesn't know better
  2. He's arranged for the vaccines to be safer than intended
  3. The vaccines are mostly 'safe' and the media push is just a classic money grab to sell more product
1
LookAway 1 point ago +2 / -1

you guys are clicking a hotlink to msnbc?

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the second half there's a claim they're doing witchcraft. The evidence presented is only that some of them believe they're doing witchcraft, or doing witchcrafty looking activities. Nothing about witchcraft having real tangible results.

The second half is the big lucifer reveal. Lots of 666 evidence, but consider 666 could be mason first, and through them associated satanism. The lucifer evidence is two or three sentences in total out of several books, and a lot of hollywood types doing some obviously satanic stuff.

Consider an alternate hypothesis: the idea / religion of satanism is used as a method of control. Hollywood types may really believe the sold their soul to the devil for the fame and then do what is asked by the representatives of the church. The top of that church are likely high masons and C_A. The benefits of this arrangement is control over hollywood, and most of them don't know who they're really working for. They can tell the 'truth' about their satanic ties and nothing important is revealed and no one takes them seriously.

I did nod off a few times in the second half, so if i missed the smoking gun, let me know.

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

The first half is valuable for exposing their use of symbolism. Second half is very light on substance.

Ultimately, it doesn't make sense that this highest level secret that you only get at the top level is known by everyone in hollywood. Hollywood is full of gullible pretty faces, not masterminds. They too are being played.

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

Media takes the parts that sound the farthest from reality, add a bit more crazy to them and push that concoction of theirs as the conspiracy that they then debunk.

It worked on you and most people. Sounds crazy, didn't look into it much.

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

I stumbled upon this old article. Doesn't seem to have much sauce, but seemed relevant to current subjects.

Does anyone have any more insight into this?

13
LookAway 13 points ago +13 / -0

Agreed. We're right to question everything. It's a tiny handful of people selling hope that the plan is legit and on track. We'd be fools to blindly believe anyone, including them.

I'm hopeful that they're truthful, but we must be wary.

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every form of fraud must be exposed, regardless of needing the extra numbers or not.

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shame they're not doing signature matching.

7
LookAway 7 points ago +7 / -0

My .02$:

Hollywood faces and the politicians are the middle tiers of this power structure. They're certainly not the upper echelon. Follow the money: millionaires < billionaires < trillionaires. They're not privy to any ultimate truths.

As discussed in the video, this organization lies to lower tiers to hide the truths of the tiers above it. There's no reason to think the top tier is actually 33 and its ultimate truths can be found in a book that made it to this video.

Consider all religions as methods of control, including the one discussed in the video. Figure out who benefits.

2
LookAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't trust duckduckgo. I am suspicious of how heavily promoted it was as the alternative in Nov/Dec last year when everyone was looking for a new search engine.

2
LookAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

GA.win focuses on understanding a global method of manipulation of public perception and emotional control used by a handful to control the masses.

I don't understand why this awakening doesn't translate to a cross examination of religion as a method of mass control more often.

3
LookAway 3 points ago +3 / -0

They use the same disinformation news articles in both places. You're seeing UK written articles where they didn't realize to translate that word into American. It's happened so much they've now popularized the word in the US.

16
LookAway 16 points ago +16 / -0

This is what journalism is supposed to look like. Shame he has to do the sensationalist headlines to keep up with the times, although his 'bombshells' are far more substantial than most claims of such.

1
LookAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

The county had several months of delays to tamper with the evidence.

We're going to find out if they were competent enough to cover their tracks in that time.

2
LookAway 2 points ago +5 / -3

He endorsed Rubio. Wrote a something nice about Prince Phillip. Knows the depth of the election fraud and has yet to seriously try to do anything about it.

Sooner or later we'll have to acknowledge he was trying not to 'overturn' the election while making it look as though he was putting an effort into it.

Its either one helluva plan or he's with them and stringing us along.

To your question -- if things stand as they are now, hell no i'm not with him. He handed over the country to the commies without putting up a fight.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›