17
Marianasoctober 17 points ago +17 / -0

“Cage free” is not the same as “free range”. Cage free means the hens are not in cages, are required to have 1-1.25 square feet of space (that’s still pretty small), and they do not have access to the outdoors. Free range, however, means they must have at least 21.8 square feet of space per hen and outdoor access.

My point being, cage free isn’t really all that more humane so this new law isn’t really accomplishing much.

2
Marianasoctober 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since when are nfl stadiums the business of congress anyway?

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

I couldn’t get past the 4th or 5th point. So incredibly stupid. Complete fabrication.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

I follow the account OP linked. Are there others I should follow?

1
Marianasoctober 1 point ago +2 / -1

Seeing that painting and side by side with that photo is absolutely wild. That can’t be a coincidence.

8
Marianasoctober 8 points ago +8 / -0

While this is absolutely crazy, they aren’t actually sex change operations. You cannot change your sex. By calling it that you are going along with their narrative.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

From I think 2020 on, I could not get over the fact that the “current” Biden did not look like the “real” Biden. I noticed it before I started seeing it being talked about. My mom and my wife chalked it up to aging or maybe he got a face lift… but there are too many inconsistencies and it just flat-out ain’t him.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saw jay z on tv at one of the football games. I’m wondered how much longer until he has no more freedom like diddy?

6
Marianasoctober 6 points ago +6 / -0

Believe it or not… They actually put out a statement today saying they will abide by the rules and use the men’s rooms, as they should.

5
Marianasoctober 5 points ago +5 / -0

I believe this was yesterday. Today, McBride (the tranny) put out a statement saying they will abide by the rules and use the men’s room (as they should). So I think the “outrage” is over.

7
Marianasoctober 7 points ago +7 / -0

Right, was just thinking what’s the point of getting the majority if they can just put whoever they want in charge? That’s just stupid.

7
Marianasoctober 7 points ago +7 / -0

From ChatGPT:

The Brunson v. Adams Supreme Court case refers to a petition filed by Loy Arlan Brunson and his brothers, who argued that 388 federal officers, including members of Congress, failed to investigate claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election, thereby violating their oath of office. The Brunson brothers claimed that this failure amounted to treason, as it allegedly undermined the integrity of the election process and, in turn, the Constitution. They sought a ruling that would invalidate the 2020 election results and remove these officials from office.

The case gained attention as it questioned the duty of elected officials to investigate election concerns, and its petition argued for sweeping remedies. However, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case in January 2023, leaving the lower court’s dismissal in place. This rejection effectively ended the Brunsons’ attempt to pursue these claims at the federal level.

view more: Next ›