3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

From I think 2020 on, I could not get over the fact that the “current” Biden did not look like the “real” Biden. I noticed it before I started seeing it being talked about. My mom and my wife chalked it up to aging or maybe he got a face lift… but there are too many inconsistencies and it just flat-out ain’t him.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saw jay z on tv at one of the football games. I’m wondered how much longer until he has no more freedom like diddy?

6
Marianasoctober 6 points ago +6 / -0

Believe it or not… They actually put out a statement today saying they will abide by the rules and use the men’s rooms, as they should.

5
Marianasoctober 5 points ago +5 / -0

I believe this was yesterday. Today, McBride (the tranny) put out a statement saying they will abide by the rules and use the men’s room (as they should). So I think the “outrage” is over.

7
Marianasoctober 7 points ago +7 / -0

Right, was just thinking what’s the point of getting the majority if they can just put whoever they want in charge? That’s just stupid.

7
Marianasoctober 7 points ago +7 / -0

From ChatGPT:

The Brunson v. Adams Supreme Court case refers to a petition filed by Loy Arlan Brunson and his brothers, who argued that 388 federal officers, including members of Congress, failed to investigate claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election, thereby violating their oath of office. The Brunson brothers claimed that this failure amounted to treason, as it allegedly undermined the integrity of the election process and, in turn, the Constitution. They sought a ruling that would invalidate the 2020 election results and remove these officials from office.

The case gained attention as it questioned the duty of elected officials to investigate election concerns, and its petition argued for sweeping remedies. However, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case in January 2023, leaving the lower court’s dismissal in place. This rejection effectively ended the Brunsons’ attempt to pursue these claims at the federal level.

4
Marianasoctober 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well her campaign is 20 million in the hole so any donations should go to pay that

19
Marianasoctober 19 points ago +19 / -0

Why does Lake have to be “in office” to expose things? If she has dirt on them then expose it anyway

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump posted earlier that Nikki Haley and Pompeo will not be in his admin

19
Marianasoctober 19 points ago +19 / -0

What is so special about Lake? Why do they cheat so hard to keep her out? I’m sure they cheat in lots of other races but this one seems a priority for them.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also I don’t believe Trump would issue any unlawful orders. He doesn’t just order things willy-nilly.

24
Marianasoctober 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yep, he tweeted that hours before it was official. Now we know why!

view more: Next ›