7
Marianasoctober 7 points ago +7 / -0

Democrats are already implicated in what has been released. The left doesn’t believe it. They won’t believe if the full, unredacted files are released either. They’ll say Trump switched his name out for a random Democrat name or something!

1
Marianasoctober 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could be misremembering but wasn’t the incumbent AG working under her? If that’s the case, he may not have to go through the standard process to get approved by congress. Perhaps that was the plan all along? Bondi sets things up and the guy under her is elevated - without much scrutiny - and starts knocking things out. I could be wrong, just a theory.

1
Marianasoctober 1 point ago +1 / -0

USPS can be abolished for all I care. There are plenty of other package carriers. 99.9% of the mail I get is junk that goes right in the trash anyway.

2
Marianasoctober 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for your response, BB. This is the kind of theory I was hoping for. I suppose I didn’t do a great job of framing my question. Of course I know uniparty, they are compromised, etc. However, my question was meant like in the context of believing Trump is in control and has a plan, how does what we are seeing here possibly fit? Why would he want Johnson or Thune when we all know they won’t produce? How could that be beneficial? The fact that he doesn’t seem to be making that big of a stink over their inaction (beyond some tweets) makes me think he isn’t that concerned and probably expected this outcome. Your answer gives a plausible explanation.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

If crimes against children doesn’t do it, what possibly could do it? Even self-extermination doesn’t phase some of these people.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the left is so unpopular, wouldn’t it make sense to write right-leaning content if you want the clicks? How is it still profitable for these rags to be so left-leaning? Perhaps it isn’t the clicks that make them the money but it’s their financiers (such as Soros).

12
Marianasoctober 12 points ago +12 / -0

That question is answered in the article.

And this has to be at the White House specifically because location determines oversight. When infrastructure is part of the Executive Office of the President, when it exists at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, it can be classified under executive privilege. The East Wing sits directly above the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, the bunker where Dick Cheney sheltered during September 11th. By demolishing the entire East Wing, you create space to expand that existing secure facility, integrate new infrastructure, go deeper underground. All protected by the classification that covers anything related to presidential security.

1
Marianasoctober 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ex produce employee here. Produce Max is used at the store level for wet rack items when washing/rehydrating leafy/wet items in the back room. In my experience, it’s rarely actually done due to poor training, lack of staff, and time constraints. Even if it is done, most likely both conventional and organic items go through the same sink. Rarely did I see the water being changing between the 2.

I can’t speak to any possible application before the product gets to the store.

As for the misters, the line that feeds it is connected to a water faucet in the back. It’s just water.

Unless you buy from a store that only sells organic, any wet organic items are likely contaminated anyway.

2
Marianasoctober 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump has said something about July 4, 2026 - the 250th birthday of the nation - multiple times. I forget exact words but it implied things would be turned around by then. Trump loves the fanfare and I don’t think he would want the country to be in this state for that monumental date. I am expecting to see significant movement between then and now. What an appropriate time to celebrate it could be.

11
Marianasoctober 11 points ago +11 / -0

Upon seeing this clip earlier, my immediate thought was Trump would never say that so unequivocally unless he knew it was an airtight case.

3
Marianasoctober 3 points ago +3 / -0

they’ll want it all redacted (other than victims names)

I think you mean not redacted. Redacted would mean censored.

1
Marianasoctober 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes he did. He was one of the last second pardons. From my understanding, it was a blanket, preemptive pardon for anything he might of done from starting from a certain year (Hunter’s was from 2014, not sure about this guy).

7
Marianasoctober 7 points ago +7 / -0

They got Letitia James for this. What ever came of that? Anything?

2
Marianasoctober 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I appreciate the work that he does, Nick Sorter on X is one of the worst offenders of this. Dang near every post starts with 🚨 BREAKING

1
Marianasoctober 1 point ago +1 / -0

It takes like 3 different clicks to block someone. I highly doubt you could accidentally do it.

view more: Next ›