Different child separation policy = the coyote aren't being allowed to carry the "cargo" to the pedos.
Notice CNN uses the term "legal guardian" rather than parents, because the fucking coyote can't prove paternity/maternity.
Very astute fren. The roles have flipped:
The far-right & conspiracy theorists are mostly going with the media/FBI/SS narrative: that there was an assassination attempt.
The left are highly suspicious that it was real because they have been primed with so much "orange man bad" programming. A huge number are putting on tinfoil hats with respect to this event.
By putting on those tinfoil hats, they are entering what should have been the constitutionally-protected Alex Jones zone: expressing skepticism as to the truth of a shooting event.
But wait a moment, now we're in a dysphoria pocket. Shooting events can't be faked, but orange man bad and must have faked his shooting event. Questioning shoot events illegal, but if believe this shooting event then agreeing shooting orange man was wrong?! How shooting Hitler wrong?!
DOES NOT COMPUTE -- FATAL ERROR
TBH was my first thought when I saw the defensive sniper team as they were wearing all black and didn't look like they had put anything down over the metal...
You've lost me on most of that but I think Corey Comperatore as a name is definitely worth playing out the anagrams.
Even the simple etymology seems like a clue:
Corey/Kori: chosen, selected
Comperatore-com imperator: with the commander/leader
I'm getting ready to settle in for a rough ride with the minority of folks who think the shooting was staged.
This is a really great connection but my Sidley Austin links aren't yielding much...
In 1963, former postmaster general J. Edward Day left the administration of President John F. Kennedy to establish the firm's Washington, D.C. office.
In 1972, the firm merged with the 50 lawyers of Chicago firm Leibman, Williams, Bennett, Baird & Minow. Additional offices were then established in London, Los Angeles, Singapore and New York. Following the merger, Washington D.C. partner Day resigned and later sued the firm, In a 1974 lawsuit, Day alleged that the merger represented a "breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, fraud and misrepresentation, conspiracy, wrongful dissolution or ouster of co-partner and breach of partnership agreement." The suit was later dismissed with prejudice.[12]
^ Hmm, hostile takeover in 1972?
In 2001, the firm merged with Brown & Wood, a New York-based law firm established in 1914 with 400 attorneys and additional domestic offices in Washington, D.C., San Francisco and Los Angeles and overseas branches in London, Beijing and Hong Kong (where it practiced English law in addition to U.S. law). Brown & Wood was known for its securities, structured finance and securitization practices. Brown & Wood had offices in the World Trade Center on floors 54 and 56-59.[13]
9/11 connection?
Sidley & Austin was among several law firms caught up in the Savings & Loan Crisis and paid $7.5 million to settle legal malpractice claims stemming from its representation of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association.
^ Savings & loan crisis connection
Just because you don't find them to be personally compelling doesn't mean there aren't other conclusions.
I find that a variety of factors make the possibility that this was white-hat orchestrated the highest.
Another poster theorized it was a trap.
Swearing and name calling make your conclusions less compelling to many anons as they are emotive fallacies.
Fun to see the different interpretations but I'm finding the red carpet/emmy ones much more compelling, with the setup tweets from @USACEHQ. Strong links between that and Trump's "performance".
IMO the biggest reason for this not being some sort of trap is you don't let someone take a clean shot at Trump and hope it works out... Doesn't make a lick of sense.
Event staged by white hats for a variety of reasons, but mainly:
The START (public justification to proceed (clean)).
The clear slop of the SS and FBI here allows them to be investigated and purged for this and prior assassinations they were involved in.
I observed a total narrative vacuum yesterday. The event happened and the legacy media had to write their own headline and had no idea what to go with.
It was like they were expecting something completely different.
Was that why Sisson was complaining about a lack of "water" (information) all day?
CNN1 : JUST IN: Donald Trump is rushed off stage by Secret Service during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania.
CNN2: Secret Service rushes Trump off stage after he falls at rally
Washington Post: Trump escorted away after loud noises at Pa. rally
Focus: Trump escorted off stage during Pennsylvania Rally after loud noises rang out in crowd
MSNBC: Trump rushed offstage at Pennsylvania rally by Secret Service after loud popping noises heard
NYT: Trump Rushed Off Stage at Rally
This post expands nicely on your comment though with the link to the prior day's red castle post & 1304. Great digging.
When things are moving fast it's easy to miss a useful comment. Critical to have info reposted a few times so it gets to people who are on different schedules or missed info or need it presented differently (visually vs verbally e.g.).
I think we're very well off. People awakening at a very rapid pace. In the last two weeks we saw liberals completely drop the legacy media and openly question the FBI narrative on an attempted assassination.
It's possible two men died yesterday. It's possible Ashley Babbit died. It's also possible they were staged events.
IMO the events being staged are a better explanation for the facts and motivations at hand, and also the Q proof we're commenting under, but I can respect if you come to a different conclusion--especially in emotional circumstances where frosty reasoning is hindered.
There a higher risk of rain not falling off that roof than a human doing the same...