2
ModernMan1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lomonstov Ridge(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lomonosov_Ridge)

*The question is, “why are they arguing over owner of this underwater formation? Are there natural resources here or is it a military strategic play? Mixture of both?

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s been telling to me that the UK and Denmark have just about said nothing about what Trump has been saying about Canada and Greenland.

—*Id bet my left one that the people of Canada and Greenland are right now being psyoped into understanding that things have never been what they were taught regarding the the UK and Greenland.

Interesting to me that he chose to use the term Artic. Could be a nothing burger, but “Artic” encompasses more than just Greenland.

2
ModernMan1 2 points ago +2 / -0

The QFS map is something all Anons should give serious contemplation towards.

We have not been told “directly” how to utilize the knowledge we’ve gained for financial freedom, but indirectly we have been given the keys to the kingdom.

*If you truly believe that the financial ways of the cabal are dying then it must have dawned on you something will be replacing those corrupt ways.

The technical difficulties of replacing a 100 year++ system are great and would have had to start being integrated years ago. There is only one system that I know of that’s standing on the sideline just waiting to be flipped on and it’s CRYPTO.

It is not only smart, but imperative that Anons act on this! We are THE MOST ACTIVATED group in the whole country and we must help to facilitate the important changes that will be happening over the next decades. These changes will take more than just the power of the mind, body and spirit, it’s going to also take MONEY.

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

*I just caught what you did here, niiiice😁

I “”think”” I can honestly say that it’s been years since I directly called someone a name on GAW. If you come here long enough you’ll developed thick skin, ESPECIALLY if you’ve been here since 2020.

2020 and prior, this place was a beast! The team running this site could be soul crushingly upfront and abrupt with their mission during that iteration of GAW. If you didn’t have your wits about you you really didn’t have any business commenting. I mean,, it was encouraged, but,,,,,,, GOOD LUCK.

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s get one thing Straight, “John John is that you” was humor.

Now that I’ve spelt that out we can move to my point, WHICH IS, Q Has in-fact told us and billions of others, things that are not factual. Does that make the Q team liars? Well,,,, I guess that depends on how much of a Pauli Anna you are.

I don’t know you personally, but I’m going to assume you know this all too well and are just playing the role you were assigned. For everyone else who’s new to this place and stumbled into it I bet this place is blowing your mind, WELCOME, damn glad to have you!

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

“”Again””, Q directly said disinformation is necessary.

Because of that I highly discourage you from thinking everything Q said is written in stone, but you do you!

3
ModernMan1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well,,, I’m saying it’s “”OK”” to call me Cracker, honky, whitey, white trash, white boy, redneck or hick, but I draw the line @ Spicy Mayonnaise!

*I f@&$ing hate mayonnaise.

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

He might be, but your reasoning doesn’t hold water.

“”Define 'game theory'. Why must DISINFORMATION be provided?”” - Q

2
ModernMan1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt that was even the Bush’s, actors in prosthetics playing the role of a lifetime.

Nahhh, if the things we’ve came to learn about around here are 10% correct they have already been dealt with, everything else is the awakening.

3
ModernMan1 3 points ago +3 / -0

*I get what you’re saying, but do you honestly think that we are being given the keys to the castle but aren’t expected to go in? Nahhh

You don’t let this level of intel out and not do anything about it. Also, we should consider that a lot of what we are about to find out has already been dealt with behind the scenes.

White hats aren’t about to screwup ongoing court hearings by releasing pertinent evidence. That tells me that, yes, in-fact, trials have happened and what we’re going through is pantomime.

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

*Let’s break it up amongst groups, each group will have a numerical section that they dive into, from there Anons can tie things together!

*Ooor, we just wait and watch white hats slowly disseminate the relative info.

**Either way, “””ITS HAPPENING””

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Panda, we have been told by Q “disinformation” is necessary, so wouldn’t that mean everything is up for speculation?

“”DISINFORMATION and misdirection with Q is real”. - Q

“”Now do you understand why mirrors and DISINFORMATION is necessary?”” - Q

To want Anons to just stick to what Q said without any speculation would be akin to following Jesus but not praying as he showed us how to do it. Then, again, a lot of a Christian are praying to Jesus, so there’s that🤷‍♂️

That’s going to ruffle some feathers 😄

3
ModernMan1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I deleted for all the obvious reasons.

1
ModernMan1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Came here to say just that, “Nahhh”.

To think that they can’t say it bc it could corrupt hearings while at the same time leading us to that conclusion just doesn’t hold water.

It’s “”seems”” likely that many have already had their day in court out of the public eye. There’s a few here that get rubbed raw over this way of thinking due to secret hearings not being what the founders had intended, I GET IT.

But,,, imagine what it might be like if in a year from now we’ve got 100s/1000s of deeply scandalous hearings on the corruption of prominent figures all taking place simultaneously.?. It would be like everything we had just gone through was for nothing. We would have at least a decade of highly publicized hearings happening in realtime with all the same emotions and opinions we’ve been dealing with since Trump arrived on the scene. If you thought the country was on the tip of collapse during Trump’s first term that would pale in comparison to going through those hearings.

It would also severely jeopardize/slowdown the corrective course we are on now because ppl wouldn’t have the bandwidth to absorb and debate whether those things are good ideas or not. It would just cause waaaay too many variables to the point that the agreed upon outcome would constantly be in jeopardy.

That said, I ABSOLUTELY believe that the vast majority of hearings that “have occurred” will be available for public consumption. They have to be or Americans will always question what really happened.

view more: Next ›