If Pelosi removes Biden and then finds Harris ineligible, I think she will be the target.
I do believe the Deep State is longing for Civil War. That's the reason I'm praying that we are currently in devolution, that the military is just waiting for the right time to step up. I think the do or die for me will be the passage of this bill by Congress. These unconstitutional bills are lining up against the American people.
The forfeiture of our guns cannot happen or the 2nd Amendment Right we've declared all these years will be shown to mean nothing except we got to hold on to our guns as toys. Take away our guns and mandatory vaccines will occur. Take away our guns and the food shortages will come. We have no way to feed ourselves when they take the food away. We have no way to protect our families from the gangs pouring in from our border ...
We are really in the balance now as we've never been in the balance. I believe the comment was made that America is on life support. If our military isn't the cardio shock needed, it's going to have to be the citizens, and if not the military, on which side do they truly stand?
But if the Deep State wants a Civil War and our military allows this to continue, we have no choice. Without a Second Civil War, we're going to be slaves and/or die at the hand of the Deep State. That can't happen.
And if you're thinking this will be stopped by lawsuits ... think again. The Supreme Court is severely compromised. At least six of them are traitors.
Seemed heroic enough, but then he voted to approve Merrick Garland. I'm so over this crap, and now with the 2nd Amendment being breached, the military needs to show their cards or the patriots need to play theirs before the Senate takes an unconstitutional vote just as they allowed our Second Amendment rights to go away.
The entire Senate (not just the Dems or the RINOS) are complicit. These senators know our rights. They should be shouting about this from the rotunda of the Capitol. Instead, they're just voting against it as if to say "What can we do?"
I'll tell you what you can do ... you can tell the American people to stand up and fight the tyranny, and you can stand with us.
So tell me. Is it now time for the patriots to use their Second Amendment Rights? If not now, when? When it is taken away from us? This is a Constitutional Amendment. They can't legislate it away in the same way that they can't legislate away our state voting laws (See Article 5 and Article one, Section 4) or our Freedom of Speech. This is tyranny and an attack by foreign and domestic enemies. If we are under military rule, I suspect the patriots need to play our hand and gather to show the military they need to lay their cards on the table. If they are not in control, the citizens need to take back the Republic stolen from us.
Absolutely true.
Yes! I'm not fully onboard with Gene DeCode. He talks about earthquakes, and his reasoning is that they are 10.0 kilometers in depth. I researched why we see so many depths at 10.0- kilometers, and those are the ones that are estimates. Most earthquakes fall within that range.
However, I so see the lines and that there are several concentrated "quakes" in certain areas for a day or so. There are some that follow lines--not exactly fault lines. One day, the quakes followed the MS River from LA all the way up to MO.
The fact that the mainstream media is so quite on the number of "earthquakes" occurring throughout the world is also an indication that they are complicit with the Deep State, they can't investigate it or give answers. The answers would lead to the truth, and they can't have that.
No coincidence in that.
It also nails her coffin shut. Five flagrant treasonous acts: Two false impeachments under her rule; two attempts to obtain the nuclear codes; and the Capitol insurrection, which forensics is proving she's at the root of the whole attack.
I'm speculating (because we can't really know if there isn't something else that needs to occur), but this 1.9 trillion passage is going to go through. The Central Bank will make the payout, and the QFS will be put into effect, successfully killing the Central Bank and then Nancy will fall into the 25th Amendment trap of the "Biden Administration" (remember Trump said Biden Administration, not just Biden). She will then have completed a coup against her own party to obtain the presidency. The Democrat party will be in the chaos they always wish upon the world because dementia-laden Biden was put in place for easy control or his ill-informed supporters are not willing to admit he's cognitively challenged. The MSM will turn on her because they don't have Trump to blame. He's out of the picture.
Major wake up, me thinks (and again just speculation).
Look again. there's one on the front side too.
That was a difficult read. I was reading it at first as if the Deep State or Gnostic Illuminati was taking their own people out. Then I went back to read it again, and though it is horribly written and very confusing, I see that the Deep State seems to be warning their own.
I'm a little confused by the quote from MI-6. They cannot be oblivious that the ops that are occurring are targeting their agency as well as the CIA.
Like I said, I think I got the gist after the second read, but I'm still puzzled a little. I know that as an editor sometimes something makes sense after the author explains it to me, but we still need to provide clarification because if I'm confused other readers will be too.
I'm not sure, but I wonder if Nancy Pelosi isn't going to go for broke and push both Joe and Kamala out. Kamala truly is not eligible, and they knew that. I'd love to see Nancy walk into this thinking she has support, but people put Joe in for a reason: to control the government through his dementia-laden brain. Kamala would then be the next choice because she's proven she'll do anything to climb the ladder. If Nancy steps in and creates a coup in her own party, she may find herself in a worse position than Cuomo. With Trump out of the picture, that could be the biggest story the MSM has had. They would have to stir up division in the Democrat party. And Nancy will have committed a number of treasonous acts.
Oh, I'm praying. Those of us who know what is happening are suffering because we know what is occurring, but in this war, when all is said and done, President Trump is limiting the casualties. I've barely suffered. Others have suffered the lost of loved ones, the loss of income/business, etc., and the children...my heart bleeds for every child who is waiting for this war to be won.
I agree. Social media is happening today. More posts that seem to be pointing in this direction. I've been wondering if the 1.9 trillion bill passage is being done to drain the Central Bank and if we aren't awaiting the Trump prophecy of the 25th Amendment being against the "Biden Administration," not just "Biden." That would mean that Nancy Pelosi could be planning a coup against her own party as well, as Joe's VP is equally as incompetent and definitely not eligible for the job. Together with Pelosi trying to grab the nuclear codes from Trump and then Biden, I could see where she could be charged with five counts of treason (the two faux impeachments, the two attempts to gain the codes, and the January 6 insurrection, which reports last night showed was all planned from the inside). There could be more, but that woman will be in a world of hurt.
He had a temper tantrum, actually. He was fine with dishing out criticism, but he couldn't take it. Some of the criticism was constructive. Some of it was the usual, but as a moderator, one must be ready to handle that, especially when one is wanting to moderate free speech and thought without allowing others to come to their own conclusion.
You might want to expound on your opinions a bit. The link is to a local San Diego paper. How is that lazy? We had the same kind of unexplained happening in Florida in Fort Lauderdale. The link was to a local news video. There were loud booms heard but no one ever found the answer for them. They were not earthquakes, and people were left to make their own conclusion. Given the amount of Air Force action all along our coast (I'm from East Central Florida on the coast and was driving near Patrick Space Force yesterday afternoon and was amazed at the helicopter traffic), and the most recent detonation of the coast of Daytona, I believe we're either bombing subs and that was the reverberation heard or there's a tunnel.
And why be so hard on someone if you consider them new?
They can't see the irony. We have been taught by FB and Twitter that freedom of speech is not absolute freedom of speech. This is the danger that I kept pointing out for a long time, receiving the same old pat answers, "But it's so convenient to stay connected to family and friends..."
At what cost? This is the cost. A governor who touts free speech does not even know what that means. What is means is that a platform offering free speech doesn't have to agree with everything its members say. They simply monitor it for the occasional unlawful forms of speech.
I'm not arguing against the possibility that George News may have had nefarious reasons to exist, but I can't tell you that for sure. I doubt, however, that George News knows much about GAW.
Three weeks old.
Thanks for clarifying. And God bless you, too.
Ah, another refreshing debate. I will not go home. I am in the game. I want to hold people accountable. I do believe Trump, but we're in a holding pattern here. Why do I want to give money to candidates until I'm sure the election fraud has been remedied. I'm careful with my money. I'm fiscally responsible. I am awaiting Trump's triumphant return, and then you can bet that I'll be giving to Save America.
You misunderstand what I'm addressing. The issue is freedom of speech. George News is the catalyst. Freedom of speech requires that one be able to express their ideas and others are able to reject it. I have stated many times that I am 100% NOT standing on the side of George News, but I'm finding it increasingly ironic that many on this forum, which advocates a Great Awakening, are bringing in the tactics of Twatter to close down debate.
In all honesty, if you get away from GA and go to a site like social.quodVerum, you will see the hypocrisy that is rampant here at GA. Intellectually, and apart of the Q boards, they have arrived at what is actually happening in America: devolution. They've shown the evidence. They have arrived at what I consider a very real conclusion. No need to debate it, but the debate is still open for debate there. Many on this board tear down people on social.QuodVerum because of their failure to embrace Q. They cry "shill" at the mention of Thomas Wictor. I find that his analysis backs us Q, but oh no, we can't have anyone arrive at the same conclusion without Q in the picture. No, siree.
But on forums like social.QuodVerum they don't suppress the freedom of speech. They opine and debate. Great Awakening is not a site to opine and debate unless you're all full of "hopium" (can't have anyone express a concern because that's dooming). You can't opine or debate unless you read the boards and have the same conclusion, and the conclusion of at least two moderators is that George News is not Q, therefore, there is no value. God forbid someone go to George News simply to look at pictures. I do agree that trying to link George News to Q is probably a waste of time, but if someone wants to do it, let them. That's called freedom of speech. I've asked a question three times already and apparently no one has been able to answer it. It has been ignored. I'm not asking it again, but I think one conclusion I can come to about the subject is that people are afraid to address the issue because moderators will circle and pick at their carcasses.
I think we sometimes forget that not everything is about Q. Some things just are. But if someone goes to George News OR to Pompeo or to Scavino, it's their prerogative. Here, I'll just say it: If Q said no outside comms, no one needs to be running to Pompeo and Scavino, et al, tweets either. Those our outside comms, but where is the "hopium" in that. Don't bring it up on this forum where suppression of freedom of speech is the norm.
Or are they letting the deep state know they're ahead of them on whatever their comms are about?
So what does the dog on the leash in the picture of President Trump shared by Jim Jordan mean?
Shills is a word used quite freely around this place. I mean, if you call having an open debate, and the person on the side that isn't your side is a shill, I guess you have that right. However, I saw very few say anything that would make a moderator run out of the room crying. He opened the floor for debate, and as soon as his side wasn't popular, he closed the debate. Then when people addressed that issue, poof, he's out of here. Can't take the criticism.
Can you share the caption for those us who are locked out of FB? I'd love to know what it says.