Ah! Good catch.
This is so embarrassing for our country. These people are playing at leading a country. Is this really Jill Biden's mission--to speak for the dogs? And if these are comms, how pathetic can you get? I just want to go climb in bed and hide under the covers. If this isn't a stinking nightmare of which we will awaken to a Trump presidency, I got to tell you, we are in one heck of a crap hole. America is the Titanic, and the freezing water is up to our eyeballs. We're about to sink.
But wait ... Jen Psaki circled back I believe. Epoch Times sucks! I can't even sign into it with my password. Anyone catch the article?
This has been retracted. https://twitter.com/ABC10/status/1369399983686946822
I will not be giving money to the RNC or to Save America PAC until Trump is back in office, having taken back his office stolen from We the People. When he is clearly again named the rightful Commander-in-Chief and all those responsible for putting the world through this hell are punished or awaiting punishment, I will definitely support Save America Pac, but until America is saved and I'm sure my tax money isn't being laundered back into the hands of the Democrats, I cannot give. It's just being financial responsible. You need to cling to what you got while you still got it.
List your favorite comment: "I keep waiting for Dorothy's house to fall on her."
This was better than any sitcom or comedian. Still making my way through the train wreck. Thank you for nabbing those. I haven't done my daily dislikes today. I'll do that as soon as I enjoy the scrolling beatdown.
If you do a search of Hillary Clinton's name, you'll find she attended a virtual conference of Women's Day along with Nancy Pelosi. Unless the allowed her to attend from GITMO since the article stated wildly that she was flown to WPB but clarified that Trump wouldn't see her, she's still, unfortunately, free.
I am 100% not attached to George News. I've only viewed what others have pointed to. I'm neutral, which actually means open minded. I listen to people who are clearly schemers because as an author, I've always studied people. When you close the doors on things with a permanent thud, you close out truth as well. There is a little truth in every lie. If you are incapable of dividing truth from fiction, then you're going to want to throw out the baby with the bath water.
My only issue with GA and GN is that certain people seem only to want to squelch the rights of other people simply because they have a different take on things. And for the life of me, I can't figure out how that irony is lost on the close-minded.
All you had to do was put Hillary's name in the search engine, and you'll see she was not at GITMO yesterday. I don't think they'd let her do a virtual conference for Women's Day with Nancy Pelosi if she had been arrested. And the article is a steaming bowlful of crap. It's horribly written, but I think most of us have just forgotten how real journalist write.
I watched this, and sadly, I'm so cynical these days, my first thought was that she recorded this to make a play to the bigger news outlets. She may believe what she says, and I applaud that, but I think the main reason was to get the attention of OANN or Newsmax. Perhaps, if I'm not so cynical, she believes what she says, and she sees the writing on the wall for Fox and other MSM, and she's declaring that she's not a part of it. If I were an astute reporter or announcer, I'd be doing that. I wouldn't want to be in the shoes of any of those still with the traitorous MSM.
I get the feeling from listening to The Five (switching the channels on my Sirius XM and landing on Fox News Channel at just the appropriate time) that Greg Gutfeld is doing his best to get out of contractual agreements. He is not holding any punches. HIs biting commentary the day of Tiger Woods accident sent a clear message. Primarily, this is what he said: I know we can't report on any of the news that's making a difference, so we have to spend an hour on this, but I don't have any prayer left for the likes of Tiger Woods. My prayers are for the people who need them (this from a once and maybe still agnostic). Not verbatim but he said enough to let people know he is not happy at Fox .. and Dana Perino's exasperated sigh at his comment said all you needed to know. That Bushite tries to come off as so sweet and innocent, but she worked for the Bush family. She couldn't come away from there as clean as she wants to portray.
People are digging more and more into Telegram. Perhaps it's a good platform, but only if you know for sure which accounts are real and which are fact. By instinct, I ran away from the platform. Something just feels off about it.
Why is the same picture used for three different states? I live in Florida. I'm unaware of mass shootings.
I honestly don't give a fig about his return to social media. I want him returned to the White House. The Supreme Court completed its treasonous actions yesterday by dismissing all suits without even entertaining the thought of looking at evidence. Unless our military are doing covert activities at the border, children are beginning to be trafficked. If this is for the children, seems to me that the time is about right for showing the people exactly what is happening and why it is happening and shining light into the despicable darkness.
How convenient that the alleged Capitol officer who allegedly shot her is in hiding. She didn't die at the Capitol. The entire video of it shows so many inconsistencies, including the fact that people were allowed to carry a dead body away from the murder scene. Wouldn't CNN have followed a blood trail if there had been one. I mean that would be too good to pass up. There was no blood trail because she wasn't shot. There was a blood packet that was pressed by a man who placed his hand behind her head. And broke glass into the speaker's lobby? Does anyone believe that the real glass would be breakable? Has anyone researched whether that glass had been tamped with or replaced in the days before the riot. And the best evidence against this shooting is that an ex-military Trump supporter is not going to be waiting at the back of a hoard of insurgents, be ushered forward, and breach any government building. Not. Going. To. Happen.
If this woman died, she died because she was a useful idiot and her usefulness ended and her liability to them was too much for her to be able to live, much like Mr. Floyd.
I don't have strong feelings one way or the other about George News, but I do have a strong feeling that people are taking sides, and things are becoming divisive on the forum. No one had a problem with the receipts provided in the moderator's post, but when someone becomes dictator and tries to be the thought-police because others have a differing opinion, that creates an issue on a forum where free thought and speech should be lauded. I mean, we can go to Twitter or FB to be banned.
I asked pertinent questions yesterday about the meaning of outside comms. I never received an answer. For example, what makes George News an outside comm, but Pompeo, Scavino, et al, tweets are not considered outside comms? Legitimate question with no intent to doom. People are scouring the boards and sharing connections.
I do think the problem is not that the moderator has a problem with George News and that he laid out his reasons with receipts. The problem is that the moderator expects everyone to believe as he believes, to accept his receipts or be damned, but this is a forum in which those like the commentator of this thread have done equal research and come to a different conclusion. That is freedom of thought transformed into freedom of speech. It's opposition to the moderator but it is also open debate which by the act of banning has turned it into a free-for-all with people taking sides, which is not what this forum is meant to do.
The irony of being banned for giving an opinion that opposes a moderator's opinion should not be lost on anyone. The moderator opened a can of worms that may not be resolved until the moderator can tuck the pride inside and realize that freedom of thought and speech are not his to moderate.
Again, I don't hold an opinion on George News. I generally see it through the lens of others who are watching and provide analysis of certain topics. Are they comms or just good information? To me, that's a question worthy of Pompeo and Scavino tweets as well. But no one's going to get banned for announcing that Pompeo tweeted Scripture on Sunday and relating it to Q. But God forbid, someone try to do the same with George News.
Not a good call at all. People are tired of what is happening to them in reality. The general population on this board have had an election stolen from them, have seen injustices continue, are rightfully upset by the fact that a virus has been used to call many into submission, and they come here for answers only to find out that this board is no better than FB or Twitter.
Oh, okay. Whatever you might think. I mean, he only gave his all for the colonies. He refused to be called a king.
But you can go ahead and believe that if you want. Go ahead and believe a "true blue American with a name like Izraul Hidashi. I don't think he would in any way have an agenda.
Well, you know, in Utah, the only people who can have control over anyone is the Mormon church. But, hey, if it gets them maskless, they should go for it.
And the article on this Twitter post is truly disgusting. The transgenders are now moving women into second class or lower citizenship. They use a vile name for women. If a white, straight man said that name, the entire leftist community would come down upon them. But since these people are insane, and that seems to be of most importance to the left, they get away with it.
Thus the reason being tolerant any longer is intolerable. This type of thinking is going to upend society--and it has made a giant leap toward that because we have tolerated it for far too long (me included). My standard "Christian" statement was "I don't need to know your sexuality ..." as a way of dealing with this issue. They may not want to hear it, but they put it in our faces every day, and the more we allow it, the more demonic they become.
In my own family, I was ostracized because I am a Christian and a d-i-l has a gay brother. They feared I'd say something to him at family gatherings, so my husband and I have been shut out of our son's life. In trying to be neutral, I did the wrong thing. I now see that as dark not wanting to be in the present of light, and well, if I am to shine the light, I will be discussing why that lifestyle is abhorrent to God.
I have made up my mind. Calling this behavior out is not racist. It's sanity. the alphabet community is insane and demonic in every form and aspect. It's unnatural and thus it is against the law of nature and, therefore, and more importantly against the Law of God. Anything that contradicts God in its values and practices is ungodly. Anything that fights against God in its values and practices is insanely demonic.
I stopped shopping at Target the moment they bought into this crap, and my reason was that they were moving the chains of humanity down a dark road. Oh, and if I ever took my grandchild into a woman's bathroom of any business that allowed this insanity and I found a male inside, only my grandchildren and I would come out alive. And that's a promise.
Following up on my question about the comms: can you explain what a back channel would be? Would that be channels not publicized or are Pompeo, Scavino, et al considered back channels? When Kayleigh, Dan, et al post pictures that are clearly related to Q, how do these people factor into Q if only a handful of people know the inside information?
I know it seems like I'm a normie, but I'm not. I've been following, and when someone raises a question, I always apply it to other aspects. I call this critical thinking, and I'm actually asking for the critical thinking of others that can prove or deny the direction I'm going. I guess you could say I'm following the directions of Q post 4101
This appears, at least to me, to be a serious attempt to discredit Q. As many have stated, they've had gut feelings about George, but they haven't been able to say why. I believe the explanation here with the links is enough to say I'm not going to invest time in George.
But this brings up a question about "no outside comms," and this is a real question. I'm not dooming. I'm really trying to go with the information given and look further into other "outside comms" and if they are not considered outside comms and why. If there are no outside comms, why are the Twitter posts of Pompeo, Scavino, and Don, Jr., examined for their ties to Q posts? If there are no outside comms, maybe we should be looking only for events (which is a little difficult since we have such censorship)? Again, this is a question based on what seems logical thinking to me. Does anyone have information where it was said we should pay attention to these posts? I'm always a little critical of the jump on Pompeo's Sunday morning tweets. I think the man is a Christian and simply sharing his faith on Sunday with scripture, and everyone is trying to turn everything into a reason to search the Q posts.
Really hoping to find the answer to this one.
That was a strange and creepy walk through creepy town.
I gave that thought a gander, too. I don't like to think that Pence is exactly the opposite of who he seemed. However, the truth is, if he let his base desires get the best of them, Rosenstein and company would exploit them. The whistleblower says he was managed. I don't think Pence ever said to the whistleblower his reasons for his actions. I believe some of that is his take on it. Rosenstein and company thought the would be in line. If Pence's sexual deviancy was knowledge to them and if they thought he was going to be in the White House, you don't think that they used it for leverage.
These people are truly sick. There's a lot to take in with this transcript. Frightening stuff.
And hopefully he'll be in Maine as well. Those two BFFs have to go.
Now that's a comm!