Your primis is false

You would need a two step virus like HIV. Imagine if HIV became airborne.

Just like laws can be made that prevent homosexual intercoarse or pedophilia.

Exactly

Sorry but this is misinformation.

• The CDC is not saying that. They are instead saying what the new varient is more easily spead. That's all. Exactly what we already know, the vax does nothing to prevent infection, and even if it did, new varients mean those with previous infections or vax, are once again ceceptable. Because corona viruses mutate. That's all.

What's the clear legal explanation for making incest illegal for gay siblings? I will do you a favor and tell you. Because all rights are based on moral law. Morality is a religious idea. Rights are only absolute when there is an absolute moral authority (god given), else they are given and taken by the ever changing moral ideas of the government. Many things are illegal due to morality including incest law, which has been around since before the idea of genetic abnormalities. As a society gets further from God, morality has no grounding and laws slowly allow for less and less moral actions to be tolerated. Eventually leading to a society like sodom and gomorrah. Where all morality it thrown out.

No need to be regular though. I poop once every other week and its like a rabit turd, never bloated and never constipated. I have no poop because my body processes everything I consume. There was a study done with people who had colostomy bags. Those that consumed only meat, had no poop, only a very small amount of fluid.

Yeah I agree, I think it was traditional arson

You seem to be under the erroneous idea that a law preventing two consenting adults from marrying or having sex would be unconstitutional, in yet you already know that no right is absolute. So explain how gay sex or gay marriage is unconstitutional but not incest or incest marriage? What about gay incest marriage/sex, since there is not birthing issue? Why is that not unconstitutional?

Does that include who you can marry or have sex with? :)

Now we are getting somewhere. So you mean to tell me, that the right is not absolute and that other laws can supercede that right?

It should be clear that the comparison is very similar.both cases deal with intercoarse, both cases deal with constitutional rights. Both cases are using the persons partner as justification. Both cases deal with morality. There is not a closer comparison, if there is I would love to hear it.

Im Back, so essentially the argument you are using could also be used to advocate for pedophilia since the government is discriminating against the age of their partner.

In the end this is not the way the law works, constitutional laws are based on actions not traits. The government of Uganda is not acting against the traits of the parter but the act of pedophilia as well as the act of homosexual intercoarse.

This is incorrect on a few levels. But i cant get deep into right now, We have a different constitution. In Ugandan law, Each individual is sovereign, meaning they are their own. The persons rights are their own. The point being, the government would have to discriminate on that individuals sex directly and Not in relation to the sex of another. I will make a comparative of your argument later. I am a little busy at the moment.

Either you are conflating "sex" with "intercoarse" or you are assuming gay is only guy on guy and not girl on girl. In either case you would be wrong.

The only thing I eat is red meat. I don't eat veggies, I don't eat fruits or grains. Good thing I also don't take vaccines

You can fight this very easily. This is a common practice. And it's easy to win especially if they when higher than a 10% increase

Attention (CNN SUCKS) BUT:

• Although CNN is most likely fine with pedos what you are reading is likely a misunderstanding -let me explain.
• The Ugandan Law that these pedos are breaking is called the Anti-Homosexuality Act. so in other words CNN is accurate to nick name it the anti-gay law because that's what the law is.
• They also call the law controversial, but then go on to explain that under this same law, all gay acts, result in life in prison which is technically against the Ugandan constitution. CNN IS WRONG on this:
• Chapter 4 section 21 of the Ugandan constitution states:

(2) Without prejudice to clause (1) of this article, a person shall not be discriminated against on the ground of sex, race, colour, ethnic origin, tribe, birth, creed or religion, or social or economic standing, political opinion or disability.

• Nowhere does it prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Forensic analysis is considered admissible. The Forensic facial wrinkle mapping data points is infact evidence that each of those images show the same person. If you want to counter this, feel free but you would need something on par. Like for example, Forensic audio analysis. Take old and new recordings, and see if the person is the same or not.

Eye color can change with age and lighting.

• Still image of the wrinkle mapping points: https://trello.com/1/cards/62852c6111f6f546436a2d35/attachments/62864ba415b35d58b1516f46/previews/62864ba515b35d58b1516fa8/download/Analysis.png
• gif of the face from similar angles through the years, focus on a single mapping point and watch as it moves (from age, angle and expression) but exists. https://i.ibb.co/yqQ2GJ6/ezgif-com-gif-maker.gif
• gif of his ears specifically. Showing the structure remains the same. https://trello.com/1/cards/62852c6111f6f546436a2d35/attachments/6328a4369937be01f99e8cfe/download/ezgif.com-gif-maker_(1).gif bidens ear, showing scar tissue around it, https://trello.com/1/cards/62852c6111f6f546436a2d35/attachments/62852e58a0f63a6e32e03937/previews/62852e59a0f63a6e32e03987/download/005.bmp
• an example of a face lift scarring resulting in pixie ear, strikingly similar to bidens scarring. https://trello.com/1/cards/62852c6111f6f546436a2d35/attachments/628680ca1bcbc554b95d01e9/previews/628680cb1bcbc554b95d0210/download/2797C2A900000578-3039599-image-a-52_1429103346700.jpg
• facial lift pixie ear before and after: https://trello.com/1/cards/62852c6111f6f546436a2d35/attachments/6286835c3930c423a2aa5159/previews/6286835d3930c423a2aa5181/download/faceliftBA5.jpg
• not many also seem to know that bidens right ear is a little deformed near the top web. There is a dip. This dip persists in all images
• only his right ear is attached

This is false.

There is proof and I've posted several times before.

I try my best to stay open minded to new data, that said, I have tested this theory against forensic science and the idea that he is an actor or clone or cgi or robot, falls apart against science. I don't mean science that some MSM talking head spouts I mean my own forensic science shows conclusively that every one of those biden images are of the same human.

You are correct. I've posted about this many many times. If we are on the side of truth, we need to accept data even when it goes against our collective bias. My comment against the fake biden narrative always gets ratioed but i would rather tell the unpopular truth than a popular lie.