1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's really not a difficult problem, since you would basically have to run a census of people right off the bat anyways.

Just a simple 1: Are you a Canadian Citizen? 2: Have you maintained residency in Alberta for more than 1 year? 3: Have you resided in Canada longer than 5 (or 10) years?

Numbers may have to be tweaked, however just 1 and 3 would be enough to filter out 80% for deportation, and 2 stops cross-province shenanigans.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, they could have bases in a "territory," but the argument that they are defending sovereign American territory is less compelling without these territories being actual parts of the United States

I do believe there is a bit of a misunderstanding here, I am referring to the Yukon, Nunavut, and Northwest Territories as Article IV territories. An attack on these territories would be no different than the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, given Hawaii wasn't granted statehood until 1959.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

If parts of Canada secedes and is annexed by the US, I'm thinking it's more likely that they would keep the northern provinces as territories instead of granting statehood due to the tiny, mostly Indian populations that north. If anything, it's more likely that Alberta and the like might be broken further down because of their existing size.

2
NanoKhuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wouldn't be suprised if Ontario and Quebec tried to stick it out by themselves because their identity is that of hardcore anti-Americanism and anti-Englishism for the 2 respectively.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Worst part is it technically still is, you just have to pony up for a pre-86 one. Only will cost ya the price of a new Toyota Camry and then some.

Just buy an FRT or Super Safety, 90% of the function without the NFA bullshit.

2
NanoKhuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it isn't. This is a Government slaughtering children. The reason for the second amendment is to ensure that Governments don't do shit like that.

As a slight aside, have you done any research into SSRIs or antipsychotics? Compelling evidence the Feds may be weaponizing it for the purposes of mass shootings.

3
NanoKhuma 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Think of the children" is the same logic used for gun control, and just like gun control you need to take a step back and understand that they are trying to manipulate emotions.

3
NanoKhuma 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just the logic behind it is pants-on-head retarded. Even if we assume fluoride was good for teeth, you are going to spend an arm and a leg for teeth that are going to fall out in 10 years anyways...

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lowest rates of brain cancer vs Highest ownership of smartphones.

Testicular cancer is a sly one because we know excessive estrogen is a massive causal link, which both water pollution of birth control hormones and the MtF trans crazy are at all time highs, AKA massive confounding factors vs EMF.

Do I really need to point out how cutting roots to put a pole in the ground can kill plants?

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have completely ignored the point I have made. Which frequency band is actually responsible for this supposed cancer incidents?

Is it the low band 600-900 MHz previously used for color television? Is it the mid-range 1.7-4.7 GHz band already used for decades for Wifi, Bluetooth, and the like? Or is it high-range 47+ GHz, rarely used outside of consumer satelite television because it gets blocked by the very atmosphere, and can't transmit beyond a few hundred feet at BEST.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Electric blankets

If resistive heaters, the most basic possible electrical load, produce enough EMFs and of the right type to be harmful, then the safe amount of electricity is 0.

It would make no difference whether you were sleeping or not, or if you could somehow escape the EMFs for 8 of the 24 hours a day (which most likely couldn't even if they tried), the only real solution would be to regress society to the 1800s.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Define "5G". Modern 5G technologies have very broad frequency bands that are carrier specific, and by claiming 5G bad, you are lumping together 3 completely disparate bands like 600MHz, 2-3GHz, and 47GHz.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Question, would not prosecuting this case be another chance to futher restrain governmental power via the courts?

The fundamental issue in the article is that the ATF can still concoct legal "theories" to prosecute items it previously rendered as illegal, despite the rules codifying it as such being invalidated by the courts.

Wouldn't you have to establish judicial precedent for some hypothetical next time, whether the ATF or some other alphabet agency, by prosecuting this case and attempting a judgement against the Govt? I understand it's kind of barbaric to seriously risk the fate of the defendant to the whims of black robed dictats, but it may very well be best to attempt this under a friendly administration, not a hostile one.

10
NanoKhuma 10 points ago +10 / -0

Oh I don't doubt it, not at all. Just merely commenting on the massive Mockingbird ops going on right now.

Please excuse my lack of archiving, I don't have a whole lot of time for commenting right now.

Yesterday's news I am pointing out.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can't really easily fix housing prices on the top level given so many of it's input costs like zoning and licensing for instance have been put in on the lowest levels.

1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing stops you from tariffing China to bring the jerbs back, while also tariffing Argentina to improve trade, which both happened. World isn't completely solid black or completely solid white.

4
NanoKhuma 4 points ago +4 / -0

Really think the Liberation Day tariffs are prime for massively cutting income taxes for the middle class, imagine the PR of trying to argue for rehiking the direct income taxes on people in leiu of indirect tariff income.

Might not be the best long term, what with bringing back industry, but sure beats what we have now.

3
NanoKhuma 3 points ago +3 / -0

The way bonds work is different than how loans typically work for you or I. A loan normally has you paying back the principal (the amount you borrowed) along with interest over the term of said loan.

A bond instead has the principal as a lump sum payment at the end (aka, the bond matures), with the monthly/quarterly/annually payments being interest only.

In the case of the US govt, they don't have trillions to pay back the principal of all the bonds, so instead they have to make a new bond to pay the old bond off (like balance transfering a credit card). High interest rates means the new bonds are more expensive to keep, which means govt becomes more expensive to keep running.

2
NanoKhuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

Long history of the powers that be destroying the family unit to destabilize society, just so happens that the black family unit was the first to fall apart.

Never really saw this stuff before the Great Society program.

2
NanoKhuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

At 410 billion, you could by the IRS's own numbers knock out the 10, 12, and possibly even the 22 percentile bracket and still potentially have spare change. Seriously, 410 billion is practically no federal income tax for under $100,000.

IRS excel spreadsheet if you want to see for yourself. It is going to mostly be column 6 and 7 to look at.

view more: Next ›