I've been Q-agnostic all these years, and all that the media freakout is doing is making me more interested in the whole thing.
The sudden, concentrated focus on Q after three-plus years is too obviously coordinated. After 1/6 it seemed to switch on all at once, from all directions -- left and right alike.
From the major-media big-tech left, Q has become a convenient all-purpose pretext for them to indulge in the witch-hunting they were born to do. From the controlled-opposition right (which is virtually all conservative media) the mantra has been that we'd all have gotten out of our seats and Done Something (what exactly Something would have been, they can never articulate) if only it hadn't been for that meddling Q.
Very odd, very hysterical reactions over a "debunked and discredited" movement. The kind of reactions you often see from guilty people.
well I agree that it certainly is suspicious that there's another person in the United States named "Michael Smith", but
PLZ EXPLAIN TO THE N00B HOW THE ASTRONAUTS THAT WERE FILMED BOARDING THE SHUTTLE EITHER ESCAPED THROUGH A SECRET HATCHWAY PRE-LAUNCH OR SURVIVED BOTH THE EXPLOSION AND THE COMMAND MODULE'S 200 MPH IMPACT INTO THE OCEAN. PLZ ALSO EXPLAIN WHAT NASA'S PURPOSE IN A PLOT THAT SHUT DOWN THE SHUTTLE PROGRAM FOR TWO YEARS WOULD HAVE BEEN AND ALSO WHAT KIND OF STUPID COVERUP ALLOWED THE DEAD ASTRONAUTS TO GO BACK INTO SOCIETY IN THEIR SAME FIELDS USING THEIR REAL IDENTITIES.
AND IF IT'S NOT TOO MUCH TO ASK PLZ ALSO EXPLAIN HOW AN EXPLOSION THAT WAS BROADCAST LIVE TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN 1986 IS A "PHOTOSHOP".
THX IN ADVANCE GENIUS.
They are not alive.
Sheila Jackson Lee represents a 'hood district in Houston.
These days Houston is looking very much like the kind of town that would keep someone like her in office for over 25 years.
If he doesn't, there are ways of finding it.
If Amazon, Apple, Google and Microsoft are allowing them on their platforms then you can pretty much write them off as an outlet to be trusted.
I was a member and frequent donor to RSBN throughout the campaign but they seemed to switch into Cuck Mode in the days leading up to the inauguration. When one of their hosts was doing a walkthrough of militarized DC -- you know, the town that decided it needed to bring in 25,000 troops and wrap itself in barbed wire to hold a presidential inauguration -- and the live chat was blowing up with "stop the steal" sentiments, the host ominously said "if you're looking for conspiracy theories, it's not going to happen on this network." That left a bad taste with me and I haven't checked back with them since. They're clearly going to talk about what Big Tech allows them to talk about.
Apologies for the non-Q post -- however, Reagan's words from 35 years ago today may have a special resonance at this hour.
After Trump dragged his worthless ass over the finish line against Beto in 2018. PDJT knows exactly who and what Ted is and hates disloyalty more than anything.
Lyin' Ted had Neil Bush on his 2016 campaign team as an economic adviser.
He made Carly Fiorina his "running mate" as a Hail Mary play that year. (She bragged about voting for Biden this year and I wouldn't assume Ted didn't either.)
He pulled dirty tricks on Ben Carson in Iowa, and later in the primary attempted to engineer his own delegates into states that Trump had won.
He strangely seemed to lose almost all interest in the election theft after SCOTUS took a pass, after previously believing so strongly in the Texas case he'd offered to argue it before the court himself.
He's literally married to Goldman Sachs.
He EXPLODES on Dems all the time in ways that look and sound great for campaign ads, without ever actually having to accomplish anything.
Why anyone is still listening to anything he says is absolutely beyond me.
This would be the Ted Cruz who attended Biden's inauguration shortly after calling the Capitol protesters terrorists, right?
Twitter's actually doing us a favor. Soon, anyone they HAVEN'T banned will be easy to pick out as controlled opposition.
They're not people. It's easier when you remember that.
True enough, it's a psy-op. It actually makes perfect sense in a world where not a whole lot is real anymore.
Wouldn't surprise me if getting everyone on antidepressants was part of the plan. Now they can use that as an excuse to take people's guns away from them under red flag laws.
There isn't one, it doesn't exist and never did. Obama, narcissistic faggot that he was, "established" the non-existent office in Nov. 2008 just in order to give himself a fake seal to tide himself over until January. If Trump used it after the 2016 election, he meant it as a troll.
Been to Clinton, Reagan, GWB Museums, they all have fake Oval Offices. They're very cool. The Clinton one has a few extra stains on the walls.
SXM is Cumulus Media.... the same company that sent a memo to its hosts threatening to fire them if they discussed fraud. Haven't canceled my subscription yet, but certainly got rid of Patriot from my car's presets.
This is true. The timing/necessity of the oath to assume presidential powers has been a subject of debate for centuries.... for example, if LBJ had needed to make a crucial decision after JFK's moment of death but before they found someone to administer the oath to him would he have been able to, etc.
While there was nothing wrong with Biden taking the oath ten minutes early, it was yet another odd thing about a day filled with very odd things. Not illegal or improper, but it could be significant.
Any one of these points is odd on its own.... there COULD potentially be other explanations for them, though none that seem very likely. The more of these "oddities" that stack up the more impossible they become to write off, and Occam's Razor kicks into effect. Something's up.
Nothing to see here. Please disperse. </drebin>
The Constitution makes NO allowance for anyone other than the Chief Justice to preside over a presidential impeachment trial. No one. Not this necrotic motherfucker who's been warming his Senate seat for longer than I and probably the majority of people here have been alive, not anyone else.
But then the Constitution also makes no allowance for putting a private citizen on trial before the Senate to be convicted and removed from an office he does not hold.
Trump DOESN'T currently hold the office, right senators? RIGHT?
Sixth-gear, full-throttle banana republic stuff. Frightening.
You'd think they'd at least be bright enough that come up with usernames that didn't scream "HI I'M A SHILL DEPORT ME ON SIGHT" so that they might have at least a little time to hang around dropping demoralization bombs. But just look at the names they did pick. They really are that stupid.
If only anyone could have seen it all coming.
*"Reasoned debate"
"Echo chamber"
"I'm not trying to troll"
"Oh, I've been banned plenty of times"*
Heh.