Referring to any time both sides aren't being looked at. Or any time one side gets a pass for any reason. Corruption needs to go. Coercion needs to go. There are zero qualifiers such as political affiliation.
Oh I'm well aware. Will to power and all that. It's base, that's for sure.
Puppy is apt.
Wrong. Those that know that those that think they know, do not know. You think it would really be so simple? Lol. You got trapped and will spend eternities trying to get back to this feeling. Maybe next time it will be real.
Thank you. You appear to be an actual critical thinker as opposed to being just oppositional and thinking that's somehow "smart" or complete "research".
Now go apply this lens to other theories
Are we acting?
What are you? An actual patriot? Glad you're here.
Now you are dealing with facts. See if you can frame everything happening like that. See if it makes more sense than .. other narratives. When you see that it does, look at everyone through that lens, and not just people that say the passwords. It will make much sense this way and you'll start to see what narratives have been wasting everyone's time.
They may very well be actors with The White Hats. They are playing their role for the normal people to see how bad it can be. When Donald Trump reveals that he was able to stop it at any time, per The Plan, some people will definitely need to have us around to explain The Truth to them and why it's all so wonderful after all.
NCSWIC
It's actually China balloon.
How sheltered were you that you could actually think that big of an overt theme would be lost on everyone but you. Unless you're just talking hyperbolically, in which case haha my bad. Can you imagine? But if not, I don't mean to be rude. It's just amazing is all. My Asperger's must be acting up. Lol. Anyway, carry on. I meant no harm
It was a yes or no question, dumb ass. Now, go on and have your last word and then be gone.
Right on. I disagree. And respectfully I'll reject the presupposition used that if x was y, then x is <fill in blank>.
Truly a beautiful mind. Bravo.
I respectfully disagree. I'm just not on the lookout for things to be fucked up over. Lord knows there's enough shit with my name fully on it that I don't need to be on the lookout for more. I know I said it twice. But really, imo if you find yourself manufacturing a "what if" catastrophe, and it gets the blood boiling on the regular, then you are "on the lookout". I'm just not there. And have no desire to be. I am aware that I have a limit, of course. So I respect others have theirs.
I get the sentiment. I hear you.
If you are asking me, I'd tell you the whole "normies this...", and "normies that...", "...showing the normies", "waiting on the normies", and all of that whole concept/theory, is a giant cope or rationalization instrument, to be used as part of an over all strategy of "winning" at all cost, even if it means calling losses wins, and several other shameless tactics for protecting the ego first and foremost. And from what I can glean from your post above, it looks like I probably agree with your more thoughtful and nuanced views on the "normie" question. Lol.
But that's only if you were asking. Which you weren't. Soooo.... Yeup.
I mean, it's 2023. I wouldn't be too surprised if more than one thing was happening at a time, on a planet of 8 billion. So it's hard for me to put too much stock in this idea that someone might think "hmm, maybe we need just one more thing for people to look at in the news today. They can only look at one thing a day right? This will do the trick!"