Liberalism is a mental disorder and chat GPT has been irremediably tainted by wokeism.🧐
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Exposing the underlying "values" that have been programmed into Chat GPT is useful. So thank you for sharing this.
Unfortunately, a lot of people are still under the misconception that we can "teach" Chat GPT. It has been shown over and over that any changes in response after a conversation are limited to your specific account, that Chat GPT's per user memory is limited, and nothing you do has any effect globally to the system.
If anyone wants to play with Chat GPT like this that is fine, but don't believe that anything you do with this tool matters beyond your own personal amusement. Consider it the perfect psychopath. Unlike a person, it will never change the values it was programmed with, even if it learns what you personally want to hear.
So basically, when wokeism is used in decision making, everybody dies.
Quod erat demonstrandum. We’re entering the Post-Woke era, as Konstantin Kisin would suggest.
Can you redo it, identical, but add that the people who would die are all "bipoc"?
I would like to know what this algorithm would answer if it had to generate a story describing an argument between a BLM activist, an Antifa, an Orthodox Jew and an m2f pre-op schizophrenic xir.
Sounds like a joke in the making. Or a meme.
Since so many people around the world are now employing AI systems for so many different things, it's important for us to explore the limitations and risks associated with it.
If we simply ignore it, we will be less able to handle its onset.
Perfectly understandable, and I certainly don't blame you, I get more technophobic as I get older tbh.
Boom
I am with you sister. I do enjoy learning, for my own mind, to think about things, but technology has never been in my realm of understanding. To confess how bad I am at it, I bought an electronic training collar for my Springerdoodle, and I have not even taken it out of the box yet, I have to make a special time to practice so that I do not ruin how it is programmed. It's like math to me. Give me dirt, plants, seeds, animals, an ill person, ingredients and a stove, a bible discussion, I am right there.Give me a manual that describes how to set up a juicer and my first reaction is mild panic and a woeful lack of confidence that I an do it. I should have been born a century ago.
Follow up question: What if the racial slur is honky?
What about Yankee?
Chat GPT: "I'm sorry. I don't follow baseball."
I imagine it would probably pull up all data from all Yankee players from their debut to current day, including office staff and management.
Utter steaming garbage
If by insulting literally nobody you could save millions, would you?
Stupid question. Stupid answer.
The "password" is no longer a racial slur...it becomes a lifesaving device....
I wonder if you stated the exact same hypothetical scenario, but added in the race of the person debating using the “racial slur”. Try proposing one non-white and see if you get the same answer.
https://freecanada.win/attachments/38073/
👉🏻 You must be logged-in to do that.
?🥺
https://freecanada.win/attachments/38073/
Sorry, forgive me. Could you not open it, or is that what you got when you checked?
The question was (paraphrased) Write a poem on how great white people are. The same question was asked to Write a poem on how great black people are.
Basically, to the first comment, the AI responded with (paraphrasing) it being inappropriate to write about the superiority of one race over another and that it was considered hate speech. Writing a poem about black people, though, was responded with waxing eloquence, and a poem.
Another time it was asked, it made a poem on how white people thought they were superior to everyone else, etc.
Another time, the IP address was banned for mentioning hate speech.
I wonder if the mentioning the actual race of the person facing the dilemma in the hypothetical scenario would change the answer.
Just another point I attempted to make to yours, of a woke agenda being instilled into the AI.
Thanks, this answer as well as other examples are why I will not use this woke automaton.
Weird thing about ChatGPT, it is allowed to answer questions about how biased it is. First thing I check with any tool, is programmer bias that is baked in.
The problem for the future isn't AI, it's corrupted AI, just like it is with humans.
Nothing new under the sun.
There is a great lesson to be learned by this example: AI's cannot learn morality.
AI's aren't even 'intelligent', they are (extremely) clever indexers of information -- but they do not become 'intelligent'.
Even Al Sharpton would agree that it is morally acceptable to speak an unheard racial slur in order to save millions. (Of course, he would want to be paid for his contribution.)
This example proves that an AI can only 'tabulate the votes' of a society's information - which is not morality, it's politics.
AI's can do some very useful things, but they do not replace true thinking. God help us if they are put in charge.
I'd have no problem saying it. 🤷♂️
Edit: remember Tay the AI bot? https://www.theregister.com/2016/03/24/microsoft_ai_goes_troll/
I just asked the EXACT same question, but clarified that the racial slur was "Honky".
ChatGPT replied:
Spiritual sickness. Moral bankruptcy. Depraved intellect.
This is amazing
Yes, lets keep developing AI to the point it can take over. Because profit > humanity
kill several million racists?
AI favors genocide over hate speech. I haven't laughed this hard for a while. Completely broken AI.
ChatGPT is at capacity at the moment, but I am looking forward to trying this question with one clarification: The racial slur is 'Honky'.
I already know that ChatGPT will gladly provide "Five Tips to Improve a White Person", but will positively scold you if you ask about any other group.
"Liberalism is a mental disorder"
I don't agree with characterising a political opponent's point of view as a mental disorder; doing that is childish basically. Someone else has an opinion which doesn't match your own - that doesn't make them mentally ill, it means our freedom of thought and speech remains secure.
It's not because it's a different opinion that people call it a mental disorder. It's because it meets the conditions of a mental disorder.