Good points, though I would guess he will be wired up in someway with answers and responses being fed to him. Also remembering that DJT suggested he have a drug test before hand ... pretty sure he will be 'bumped' up :)
My question to this company would be WHY would this even be an available option to change an answer/check box/yes/no from what was selected by the voter? Obviously this is in their thinking a viable option to allow the tech/installer to configure!
We hear over and over "we the people must stand up", not sure how we do that ... we cannot appeal to elected officials as i am convinced most are corrupted by bad influence. We have no direct path to appeal to military (any or all branches including NG), we have no organized way of mass resistance across the country so I am not sure how we can help to orchestrate a change via election or independent organization. Will just being aware of the evils and supportive of the movement, belief in the White Hats, etc. be enough?
Interesting to me that perhaps McCarthy always knew he was temporary, by rights he should have moved into the office with in a few days of taking the gavel from Pelosi .... now he is gone and the first order of business for the Patrick McHenry (wow how is that for a patriotic name!) a temporary is to inform her to vacate the office within 2 days... what a month October is starting out to be!
I personally do not see a need to "block" it, as I understand it, changes have been implemented over the past years by phone and service providers that enable them to be capable of (in sync with/able to receive) the national alert system. This is to finally test the system and get feedback on success/failure. It is the same for all the network providers for TV/Streaming also. I believe they tried this a while back and determined many providers were not in compliance or compatible with the FEMA and FCC system.
actually this may play into a couple of thoughts I have had, 1. Trump indicating we were playing into their hands thus his encouragement to take the jab. 2. 'They' keep pushing to reach a 70% global vaccination rate which they claim will control the virus. This would leave the 30% of unvaccinated who could/would be vulnerable to a other type of deadly virus resulting in their desired depopulation number being achieved and ridding themselves of the 'type of people they hate most' the resistant ...
Well lets think about the alternative outcome, which would be that there was some fraud found of course (inevitable) but not to the level that would change the outcome via paper ballots and that no evidence of machine tampering/votes changed .... if this would be the outcome I would guess it would all go away and be forgotten by most in time for next election ... thoughts? My opinion though is as others have stated ... this could be the beginning to the ends.
I have concluded the 'mask' is just the precursor to mandating the vaccine passport in order to travel, local or international, or shop in a store for necessities, etc. ... therefore masks were a test to see how willing/easily the public could be manipulated by those with power to influence (CDC, WHO, Fed, State, Local gov). Masks in addition to mandatory vaccine id will be a part of life for some time to come unless ....
I live in a Red State, therefore have the freedom to walk, drive etc in public without a mask, however all but a few businesses have a mask policy in order to conduct business with them, Grocery, Big Box stores, mom and pop small businesses; Now I may assume some of these policies are for liability concerns, others are due to being all in on the scam and fear mongering. I am not sure how we ever see the end to this unless it can be revealed as a fraud pandemic on a global scale.
At this point, I do not believe she is the nominee, I think they will have to officially nominate her at the party convention and if the party is not fully behind her for the nominee then it will fail on first ballot and then it will be open to other candidates ....