6
PilgrimFarAway 6 points ago +6 / -0

I remember when everyone was all excited to kill Iraqis, because they were throwing babies into furnaces.

12
PilgrimFarAway 12 points ago +12 / -0

It was not clear that this was your idiot "representative". It seemed to be your own sentiment. I had to read down to here to understand that it wasn't your view! I thought you were a fren gone astray!

2
PilgrimFarAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

hmmm...Pretty sure Kari Lake proves that there is no margin of fraud!

2
PilgrimFarAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is very CIS-centric of you. I'm an authority, as my daughter has blue hair.

8
PilgrimFarAway 8 points ago +8 / -0

Looks like first step in a process of ditching Biden and then an anointing ceremony of the replacement. A month from now, this same panel will be in an orgasmic state, gushing over Michael and how he can connect with people on both sides of the isle and how he feels their pain, blah blah.

1
PilgrimFarAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

They issue I have is that the interview is posted by Stew Peters. After he pushed the snake venom counter-narrative, I do not trust him.

6
PilgrimFarAway 6 points ago +6 / -0

I bet Solyndra could get a $50BB grant to sell some random disposable crap and call it a solar charging kit for your electric vehicle.

Of course, they'll need a wind kit for night-time charging.

1
PilgrimFarAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

That could just be a campaign commercial for Trump. I know I'm more motivated!

3
PilgrimFarAway 3 points ago +3 / -0

I so wish that I had done the same thing! I allowed my daughter to be destroyed to be an understanding Dad. Worst decision of my life. She's not yet non-binary, but believes every bit of the leftist freak show.

We haven't given up, but it is a long, hard road.

It's much, much better to defend your child from the Leftist Horde.

14
PilgrimFarAway 14 points ago +15 / -1

I like a lot about RFK, but his views on the 2A are way off. If he recants those positions, I'd be all for it.

3
PilgrimFarAway 3 points ago +3 / -0

got it - To guarantee the secrecy of grand jury hearings, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) prohibits most persons present during the proceedings from disclosing what transpired inside the grand jury room; however, the proscription does NOT apply to witnesses.

2
PilgrimFarAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have always assumed that the first indictment and the first arrest are the same person, but they can be two different people.

7
PilgrimFarAway 7 points ago +7 / -0

I love that this happened and came out to the public. I do not think it was happenstance. I would imagine it's simple move-counter-move.

At the same time, I am curious how it's legal. Is it legal for a witness before a grand jury to go on TV and talk about his testimony. Remember - his testimony was harmful to the false narrative, so the rules would actually apply to him.

9
PilgrimFarAway 9 points ago +9 / -0

Public schools are child abuse. People say, "Well, in my situation, I have no option." I can empathize, but that doesn't change the fact of the abuse. If little Johnny was coming home from school with pieces of his body cut off daily, the parents would likely decide that they just have to bite the bullet and find an alternative to public school. Since it's small chunks of little Johnny's soul being cut out, the parents decide it's a price they are willing to pay.

3
PilgrimFarAway 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't know who these QAnon believers are. Never heard of them. Is that a cult or something?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›