read my reply here:

https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaLYdEm/x/c/4JJhu4NvlWJ

millions of eyewitnesses kek. have you ever been to NYC? tell me where exactly were millions of people able to gain a vantage point to see the approaching plane. what a stupid thing for you to say.

Its not so much that we can prove EVERY video fake (we probably can if we made an effort). Its that the planes violate the laws of physics in every video. They are able to do this because they are cartoons with cartoon physics. The harder thing to contend with than the videos are the eye witnesses.

"I saw the plane with my own eyes"

"Thousands of people saw the plane they cant all be wrong"

Ive put a few people to the test about their claims of seeing a plane that day. Wanna know what they all had in common? They all got the angle of approach completely wrong. So I dont know what theyre remembering, but its clearly not what they think it is. Missiles may have been used and thats what everyone mistook for a plane.

Have you ever watched a nascar flyby video?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bldWv4fbnaY

The people who were up close to the towers, witnessed an object moving supposedly 3x the speed of those cars. Anyone of them claiming to recognize it as a plane is lying. The people who were far, they saw something flying but it definitely wasn't a plane with cartoon physics.

Edit to add: Im born and raised NYC. I personally know many "eyewitnesses" to 9/11 including some that worked in skyscrapers with perfect view of downtown Manhattan.

wow guys, look at this team of scientists!

https://files.catbox.moe/o6z7va.jpg

I sure am glad to have these ones on our side, figuring out all the hard science stuff so we can finally put an end to this hoax.

Did you ever see the quality of the dental and hospital buildings at the death camps? They probably had world class surgeons stealing gold teeth and organs for the nazi elite.

The bulk of people on this sub couldn't go more than 7 hours without TV.

I wonder how much they charge for the toilet seats and hammers.

these numbers are about as accurate as the polls were for Hillary in 2016.

You need to be more subtle. Ask questions that lead to answers like Q does. Like how many death camps did Anne frank survive? What kind of death camps do people survive from? Must not be very efficient.

ok but neither of those statements or arguments against what I said. Im not going to argue with you about how long ive been following Q because thats fucking retarded. tell me how much general Flynn charges to do a speech- and then tell me what he talks about in those speeches. Flynn has future political aspirations so he tows the line so he can keep those shekels rolling in. Then compare what Flynn charges and says to what Lin Wood talks about for FREE. Tell me who is really out to stop human trafficking. I'll wait.

TRUST SESSIONS kek. stop treating Q posts like the gospel. Use your brain. Is the information Lin Wood presenting true? Are the questions he poses worth answering? Is there fire where there's smoke? How much does Flynn charge for a speech? Does he ever say anything new or worth listening to?

But you better believe they are today. Take a stroll through Jewish neighborhood and pay attention to the building materials and layouts and security measures. all those complexes are filled to the brim with the finest in weaponry lol.

Good bread.

and immigration and foreign policy and advertising and education and Ivy league and defense contractors and pharmaceuticals and vanguard and blackrock and every major executive board and on and on and on. Every single time is funny but meant to be taken seriously as well.

Did you learn from Q that AJ is MOS? What type of business model does AJ maintain? Does X22 maintain a similar business model? What other influencers maintain this business model? How much do they earn? How much do they REALLY earn? Is there a pattern in this behavior? What do all these influencers have in common? Is MOS an intelligence service? What other Intelligence Services are there? Do they run the same playbook? What did Q say about those profiting off this movement?

Nobody knows anymore about Q than I do. Know why? Because we all have the same posts, freely available to us to read whenever we want. There is no need to get information about Q secondhand when you can just go to the primary source. Influencers become gatekeepers become arbiters become mockingbirds- especially when there is financial incentive. Money is a means of control.

What is Daves opinion on Austin Steinbart? What does he have to say about Israel and the JQ? Be careful who you follow. Are you sure this board exists for the reason you stated? Where did this board originate? Reddit? Voat? Are you sure that .WIN is what you think it is? Have we all been herded here like [sheep] for a reason? What is controlled opposition? Control the narrative of your enemy?

I dont trust a single so called Q influencer. They have never been right, about anything. And its been years. Thats a long time to get everything wrong, but still have loyal followers lol. They're just grift operations taking advantage of people.

Why exactly is he a fraud? Do you have anything to back up that claim? Why did Q give Austin two proofs? Are you aware of the the Above&Beyond proof? Is everything that Q says the gospel to you? Where is your discernment? Is disinformation necessary? When do you start thinking for yourself? If Q told you not to trust president trump, would you obey or would you think for yourself? Is Q your master? Did Q say to trust sessions? To trust Barr?

hunter is a vip regular at comet ping pong. the pizza there must be grade A.

drug purchases.

I doubt you know much about him. Cheers.

im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-

1. Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up

2. there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information

3. the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"

4. other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)

5. My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"

6. what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?

What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?

oops I thought your reply was to another comment I made. Lets not discuss the dumb shit regarding flat earth like that. Lets discuss some tangible evidence points- ones based in science.

is the earths curve measurable? should it be? have people attempted to measure it? what were the results? was there an error in the methodology? if the curve is undetectable, does that mean the parameters we've been taught for the earth's shape/size are invalid? what does that mean exactly for us? Furthermore, what evidence can you provide for the shape of the earth being a sphere? Is all that evidence coming from one source? What is the history of that source? The true history?

finally, what are your thoughts on this experiment:

https://fecore.org/final-results-fecore-measurements-disprove-the-wgs84-model-by-proving-flat-lake-surface/

youre speaking in generalizations. why is that? is there something specifically you can point to that supports what youre saying? If steinbart was anonymous, would you then consider his information for evaluating? Why do you refuse to evaluate it? Is it because you dislike the messenger? Would you ignore good, pertinent information just because you dont like the source? does that make sense?

my emotions play no role in my consumption and analysis of information. Vacuum it all up, use discernment to find my truth. Truth resonates deeply within. Q should have taught you that. We dont need gatekeepers or arbiters of truth. Free thinking is about learning the truth on your own. Refusing to look into steinbart is counterproductive to learning the truth.

my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information. There is a solid contingent of people on this sub that are vehemently opposed to speaking about, or looking into anything steinbart says. These people are behaving like the mockingbird media.

"Oy vey! dont look at that information goyim! its poison for your mind! go watch x22 and Jordan Sather to get the inside scoop and make sure to donate some shekels! shalom"

Youre listening to General Flynn too much. The truth about this matter is not going to come from any mainstream, famous figures- especially not ones with security clearances which prevents them from talking about or even acknowledging classified operations. The truth is going to come when we pry it out, and standing behind someone like Austin is one way to do that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk

humor yourself and actually pay attention to him in this interview. Come back and tell me what you disagree with. and remember, this was a hit piece on him- and he still managed to maneuver it with skill.

neither of those are arguments. Why specifically do you say that?