Should Twitter buy Substack? Musk: "I'm open to the idea." WELL!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
In a perfect world, I would say its a bad idea. Better two have two thriving ecosystems independant of each other.
However, we know that anything left alone will get subverted by the Cabal's magic money, so in this case it might be a better idea to bring substack under Elon's control.
You are touching on a major concern I have, but also make a great counter argument.
That being, substack is already a beacon for truth and we should not fix what is not broken. To your own counter point, Elon's wealth would put a moat around it.
That's assuming Elon's control is an upgrade from their current position. The Twitter purchase has been good for us, and for a select few people who had been kicked off and have now been brought back, but it's too soon to say whether we're benefitting in the long term from Elon's purchase.
Merging the bird and SubStack would likely benefit Twitter, but I still don't trust Elon yet. He remains a technoglobalist, just a rival to the WEF set of technoglobalists.
If there is talk of Elon taking over Substack, my guess is, the enemy is already making a move on Substack. This makes sense since before Elon, for the past 2 years, substack has been the primary mode of disseminating the truth.
Ultimately, I want to see Twitter buried in a graveyard, or the TS backyard. As for substack, I want it to be fully free, post-Awakening.
More consoldation is not what is needed. Multiple platforms not all owned together.
Even if Musk is doing good things today, maybe that will change. Maybe he gets assassinated like he said. Someone else will be in charge at some point and it can easily flip back to being a DS company all over again. It could bring a lot more attention and monetization to Substack...but we are where we are in part because a few companies own all the platforms.
If we don't consolidate, BlackRock will.
Rigg99's point is accurate, but your counter point is fair too. In times of war we must do uncommon things, so a consolidation now to counter the entrenched media could be necessary, once legacy media are weakened (or destroyed) then decentralization would be warranted.
The time to consolidate for the benefit of the people is now…. The consolidation @Riggs99 points out is completely valid; the Deep State had a massive head start in the consolidation of not just our Media, but while American Patriots slept for the last 75+ yrs the communist/left/Nazi ideology infiltrated all of our institutions: Media, Religion, family, Corporations, Entertainment, Hollywood, Professional Sports, Universities, grade schools, Medicine, Military….. etc., To fight the DS machine we need to team up like the ‘State Militias’ did to win the Civil War….
For the Normies: Is the picture starting to become more clear???
We need a counter blackrock
True. Guess it depends on the owners, but infinite resources can corrupt almost anything
Agree in theory, in practice when antitrust type laws are not used properly and fairly it will become an arms race of consolidation.
Right now, the deep state stooges are desperately grasping for a new foothold to prop up.
They cannot build something new in as short of a time as they need to; Twitter is too established.
By consolidating before they can scramble more power, it gives us -- and more specifically freedom -- more power.
Yes, that could bite us in the ass in the future.
But nothing will bite us harder than squandering the opportunities presented to us.
I'm wondering how much front end code the engineers for Truth got from twatter. It's the same, impossible to navigate garbage, having to click a ton of comments to drill down to see everything.
Wow. That would be HUGH
Hugh Jarce approves.
Hugh Jackman agrees🐸
Why do people trust this one man with so much power. We complain about the deep state while wanting this man to control everything. We want him to buy facebook and youtube, and oh yeah make new cellphones. Not to mention the neural links Isn't this guy also the founder of paypal? I don't even know what other businesses he owns.
I agree free speech is a good thing, and we are riding high on the release of the twitter files, but do your due diligence anons don't be fooled. Trust but verify, people.
We call other people sheep while standing in the middle of the flock baaing the loudest.
I get what you say, I really do. But look at who is going crazy. All the right people are going nuts over the purchase. From the media, to "blue checkmarks," to politicians. They're all ape shit about it being taken away from their control.
You're right, and it's a lot of fun to watch, but we still need to be the watchers on the wall, ever vigilant.
I guess I will hold my peace for now and let people have their fun
Musk open to building Twitter up to profitability. SEC or whatever will block any thing he tries to acquire.
With twatter actually being a private company, with no shares on the stock market, there shouldn't be anything the Securities Exchange Commission can do, especially if he looks to acquire another private company.
Yup, I know squat about Substack, but if it helps free speech being aquired then all to the good.
Easier to buy by the corrupt is the problem.
No. No more monopolizing. Fuuuuuck thaaaaat.
To whoever owns Substack, DO NOT SELL!!!!!