Informants claim...
72-hour rule on that one.
“despite their origin, he said it is not necessarily indicative of Iranian involvement until proven otherwise.”
So, it could be a false flag operation, to start something with Iran. Gee, I wonder who has a vested interest in drawing the USA into the Middle East?
Russians retreated from Volchansk aggregate plant, only to lure Ukrainians in then thermobarically incinerated it. Only yesterday there was a video of Ukrainian victory (there was a Ukrainian flag hoisted, even). https://x.com/simpatico771/status/1839046689207820446
A end this war in a 'Just Way' = Russia is to withdraw completely to 1991 borders, and pay reparations for their damage. And Ukraine gets to join NATO fast, and receive more weapons so they can be stronk. Not going to happen.
For Russia it is not about land or resources, unlike Sen. Graham's position. What they sought was the right for Russian people to live unmolested in Donbas. Since the start of the SMO, those regions have voted to join Russia. So, the borders of those regions are not going anywhere - they are Russia by law. Putin even said that if Ukraine leaves those regions, then Russia will stop bombing. However, since then we see the Kursk insanity, full of mercenaries, BTW. So the Russians have adjusted their stance, and the West should justifiably worry about this. Problem is: who should Russians negotiate with, if there was to be a Peace deal? All these high-level meetings refuse to include Russia, so they are really war-councils, not peace-conferences. We do understand the difference, right? Furthermore, if USA is the main instigator of this NATO-offence council, Biden is Out to Lunch. We know the war on Russia is being prosecuted by a Medusa, not Biden.
Trump should not talk to this drug-addled puppet, who has lost all legitimacy as president. Ukraine must repeal the 'no negotiations with Putin' law that Z made, and they must hold elections. OR, there must be a military take-over of government, who should then negotiate in order to save Ukrainian lives.
THEN, Ukraine can plead for Peace. Otherwise, there is no-one to talk to.
I agree. Did anyone see the kerfuffle over Trump handing a hundred bucks to a mother of three children in a supermarket? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyvgBFsztkw
many have taken to social media to claim what Trump did was illegal because he is a presidential candidate. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13887307/social-media-Donald-Trump-money-groceries.html
People are claiming that Trump was buying their vote.
The reason I am bringing it up here, is because I thought of how Trump sets up these little boomerangs. If people are going to freak out over a hundred dollar grocery donation, which Trump does out of kindness and should be considered a charitable donation, then why are they not freaking out about the (((foreign))), "dual citizen" donors who 'lobby', i.e., buy votes in the Senate or House?
I think Trump had tweeted some evidences for all to see (Yeeeaow), so it's funny to see those very videos in the court-transcripts as proof of the badness of his tweeting, and the rambling lawyer goes on to say that the claims are un-substantiated because the mayor said so, that is:
The video of a woman dissecting a cat on the lawn is in the court documents (LOL), and the lawyer says, that the mayor says, there is nothing to see here, therefore Trump's claims are unsubstantiated, and a criminal.
It is definitely time to stock up on popcorns
That seems very easy to prove, but they might try to give them all sorts of cards and IDs to prove their supposed citizen status.
I believe there is free speach, which means one can say things, in public and on Twitter (X), and even political speach if "They're eating the pets" can be considered so, but one should be able can say anything. Political speach is even more protected than free speach, although I believe we are talking about the same thing.
They are trying to prove that the mean tweets caused chaos in the town, as if the peeps doing the chaos were magically Tweet-incited and not at fault, at all, for stopping the traffic (oh no, nothing to do with the Illegals rampaging)
Also, they seem butthurt over the large following Trump and Vance have. LOL
Soundtrack for this:
No need to apologize, but paragraphing makes it easier to speed-read or scan. Please try to edit the post, because it is very interesting, and most people will TL:DR.
To start a new paragraph, just press enter, twice. The first Enter command does not register as a new paragraph when you Save, for some reason - so we need to use Reddit spacing. LOL at the ignominy of that.
UN is basically USA on steroids - it was started by Eleanor Roosevelt after her husband died - but he often talked about it with her. But, USA is no longer the sole (post-WW2) hegemon.
BRICS is now a major challenge for UN, as it is gathering countries to join at lightning speed. Each conference has more deals between countries, and more countries are eager to join. The difference is that countries remain sovereign, and can use their own currency, unlike the UN, which want to dictate what countries should and should not do (e.g. universal vax), and impose a global (digital, tracked) currency - LOL, as some countries behave differently regarding currency, and have different needs - just look at the Euro - it impoverishes those who are otherwise careful with their dosh in favor of car-wreck economies - and it doesn't 'help' anyone but Ursula.
In any case, I believe the US should humbly join BRICS, and keep their dollar if they can.
I am not wasting my time looking at the man's crotch, frankly.